• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Club Sandberg (part 2)

What strings are fellow owners of the VM4 California players using? The stock strings are .40-100. I was considering using 45-105 as these basses are quite bright.
I use Nickel 045-065-080-100 on my VS4 (not the same bass, but you get the idea). It turned out to be the best balance in conjunction with the Hipshot D-Tuner I made Sandberg install – less change in action when detuning, and it keeps the aggressive brightness on the D and G strings in check, compared to what was delivered. YMMV, but it has worked very well for me, for both Hard Rock and Metal.
 
What strings are fellow owners of the VM4 California players using? The stock strings are .40-100. I was considering using 45-105 as these basses are quite bright.
I've really enjoyed the GHS Balanced Nickels (light, 40-101) and good old D'Addario XL Nickels, 40-100. I prefer a little mellower nickel on what can be a bright bass. But virtually everything I've tried on it sounds good. Might do some flats next. In that realm I'm partial to the Ernie Ball Slinky Flatwounds. Have those on a P bass and they are remarkably bright and feel great. I'm sure they would sound good on my TM4.
 
I use Nickel 045-065-080-100 on my VS4 (not the same bass, but you get the idea). It turned out to be the best balance in conjunction with the Hipshot D-Tuner I made Sandberg install – less change in action when detuning, and it keeps the aggressive brightness on the D and G strings in check, compared to what was delivered. YMMV, but it has worked very well for me, for both Hard Rock and Metal.

Any particular brand? Or are you mixing and matching sets?
 
I've been all over the place with string selections for my basses. I've finally settled on 2 or 3 different strings that work for me. If I need round wounds I typically go with Elixir SS Nano Coated. For Flats I use EBMM Cobalts. If Elixirs are not available I use round wound Cobalts. What made up my mind was an allergy to Ni that literally ate up my plucking fingers. These strings seem to not cause allergic reactions and sound good for what I do. 50-105, 45-100, & 45-130 on the fivers.
 
I'll admit, I almost did something really rash yesterday. I may have even done it, but it sold at one option and then the second place never called me back. The third place seemed priced high and I sorta backed off.


Yeah! I was really hot on that one. Then my gas backed down. It's hard to spend $2700usd and not know what it really sounds like. I wish Sandberg would release the specs with a proper demo when they do things like this to us.

They still have one of these available and they will be doing more in 2021.
 
Yeah! I was really hot on that one. Then my gas backed down. It's hard to spend $2700usd and not know what it really sounds like. I wish Sandberg would release the specs with a proper demo when they do things like this to us.

They still have one of these available and they will be doing more in 2021.

Yeah, a demo video of it would be so helpful.
 
ugh! I want one based on looks alone.

I had one of those Mike Lull T-birds. I sold it because the ergonomics and long reach to the first fret were a little uncomfortable for me (I'm 5'8" and the reach to the first fret was far). That being said, it sounded amazing, so I've thought of one of the Lull P or J bodies with their Third pickups in it. I was looking at the Sandberg California series after playing them at NAMM last year. I just loved the bass in the picture below. I played it every day at NAMM. So when I saw this Lollar equipped with the aging, it took everything to not hit buy now at $2699.

20200116_103731.jpg
 
I had one of those Mike Lull T-birds. I sold it because the ergonomics and long reach to the first fret were a little uncomfortable for me (I'm 5'8" and the reach to the first fret was far). That being said, it sounded amazing, so I've thought of one of the Lull P or J bodies with their Third pickups in it. I was looking at the Sandberg California series after playing them at NAMM last year. I just loved the bass in the picture below. I played it every day at NAMM. So when I saw this Lollar equipped with the aging, it took everything to not hit buy now at $2699.

View attachment 4148467
That’s an amazing looking bass.
 
I had one of those Mike Lull T-birds. I sold it because the ergonomics and long reach to the first fret were a little uncomfortable for me (I'm 5'8" and the reach to the first fret was far). That being said, it sounded amazing, so I've thought of one of the Lull P or J bodies with their Third pickups in it. I was looking at the Sandberg California series after playing them at NAMM last year. I just loved the bass in the picture below. I played it every day at NAMM. So when I saw this Lollar equipped with the aging, it took everything to not hit buy now at $2699.

View attachment 4148467

You mentioned the reach to the first fret. Yeah, that's consequential to me, too; both my shoulders became arthritic and needed replacement parts.

I've got one of those multi-guitar racks in my music room, and instruments rest on the bottom edge of the body. I've had my trusty Cali TM-5 side-by-side with a Sadowsky Will Lee and a Fodera Monarch. On the rack, the nut on the Sandberg is about an inch lower than those two. It does make a difference in comfort to me.