The idea is to eliminate those pro guys who are not interested in the musical or social aspects of a regular rehearsal.
I see... Well then count ME out.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
The idea is to eliminate those pro guys who are not interested in the musical or social aspects of a regular rehearsal.
It usually means "we want you to play with our band exclusively". Which is, of course, pure nonsense. When a band can keep me gigging and making as much money as I think I could/should be making at it, I can commit. In the meantime, I'll play with whomever, wherever, and as often as I please. That "commitment" crap wore thin with me ... 30 years in the corporate jungle, and all it got me was a forced retirement about five years before I wanted to retire. I now do what's right for ME ... it may include you, but maybe not.
I agree with everything said so far, but a band's desire for commitment from a new member may also stem from having had too many "climbers" pass through the outfit. Climbers are players who use the new band in a premeditated fashion to get practice, get exposure, meet other players, meet agents, steal song lists, and so on -- solely to advance their careers.
I always wondered who these people were that posted angry messages to CL, like it was a chat board........![]()

Seems to be a chat board for lots of people.![]()
It usually means "we want you to play with our band exclusively". Which is, of course, pure nonsense. When a band can keep me gigging and making as much money as I think I could/should be making at it, I can commit. In the meantime, I'll play with whomever, wherever, and as often as I please.
Well, where I posted that was the "musicians" section under "community." There are separate sections for "For Sale," "Jobs," "Services," and even "Gigs." There is even a section for "Discussion forums." Given that "community" is apparently distinct from the strictly classifieds sections for jobs, services, and gigs, I don't see any reason why people shouldn't post news and opinions there that are relevant to the musical community. I can't find any language in the CL terms of use that my post would have violated. So what's wrong with it?
Do I care enough to plunge into some labyrinth of appeals and review to get my post deflagged? Not really, no. But I don't see anything wrong with posting as I did.
It usually means "we want you to play with our band exclusively". Which is, of course, pure nonsense. When a band can keep me gigging and making as much money as I think I could/should be making at it, I can commit. In the meantime, I'll play with whomever, wherever, and as often as I please. That "commitment" crap wore thin with me ... 30 years in the corporate jungle, and all it got me was a forced retirement about five years before I wanted to retire. I now do what's right for ME ... it may include you, but maybe not.
And what's wrong with that? That's the way it's done in the real, grown-up world.I agree with everything said so far, but a band's desire for commitment from a new member may also stem from having had too many "climbers" pass through the outfit. Climbers are players who use the new band in a premeditated fashion to get practice, get exposure, meet other players, meet agents, steal song lists, and so on -- solely to advance their careers.
And what's wrong with that? That's the way it's done in the real, grown-up world.
But I think the actual motivation for the flaggers is that you are making entirely too much sense. People don't like it when you do that. Especially clueless people. It takes them out of their comfort zone.
"stealing song lists"? If you are a cover band, the material is not your property. Anyone can go to your gig and write down what songs you play. The only way to "own" the songs is to play them better than everyone else.
exactly. i think people who are possessive of song lists are mainly jealous and possibly suffer from inferiority complex.
I agree with everything said so far, but a band's desire for commitment from a new member may also stem from having had too many "climbers" pass through the outfit. Climbers are players who use the new band in a premeditated fashion to get practice, get exposure, meet other players, meet agents, steal song lists, and so on -- solely to advance their careers.
I'd much rather have someone that errs on the side of ambition than on complacency. If you have motivated folks, they will want to advance whether it's through your band or another. And if things are cool, you may advance along with them, or reap a benefit in the future.
Personally, I am annoyed by bands who try to keep everything to themselves because they are afraid someone is going to steal something. Me, I take the opposite approach. You want to know what songs work for a certain bar? I'll tell you and teach you the chords. You want to meet an agent? Sure I'll introduce you to him/her. You want to sit in to get exposure? No problem.
As if the music industry isn't reeling from various factors, but when musicians get all proprietary, it lessens the scene. A stronger scene is better for everyone, and it takes a communal effort to make it happen. If every musician took a 'MINE' attitude, we're literally up s*** creek without a paddle. If we help each other out, we at least have a paddle.
Did it come off angry? A little frustrated maybe. Mea culpa. They call it the "community" section, I thought a little input into the community would be called for. Actually, as it happens, it's now been flagged and removed... oh well...
I was prompted this particular time by a band posting that they didn't want "mercenaries" who wanted to come in, play, and collect the gig money. That set me thinking a bit; the implication is that they want someone who's going to hang around rehearsing for some length of time before the band starts to gig and make money. And THAT implies to me that the people posting are going to need lots of rehearsing before they'll be gig-ready, and that they resent a musician who might show up already knowing their parts and ready to go... which, from the perspective of a seasoned, serious musician (in whose ranks I do not count myself), is to say they want to waste a lot of their time. Am I off base here?