Long story semi-short...was always ambivalent about compression, did use it from time to time, but abruptly stopped in 2008. Recently joined a working blues/jazz band, a very entertaining and fun one, but they're serious players who demand A games out of each other and themselves. My game is a solid B+, but while I can totally lay down the fat, nobody will ever confuse my jazz chops with Victor Wooten's, especially when the speed is required. I'll never be lightning fast, but I can sort of hang though my dynamics get a little wild at my top speeds. Yet this is a band where I really need dynamics, and I'm working a lot at close to my top speed. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't thinking about using a comp again, but wasn't into anything I owned.
Coincidentally, an Ampeg Opto Comp showed up a week ago as a little holiday bonus. Liked it enough at home to give it a shot with the band last night, seemed to give me lots of dynamic range while subtly affecting upper and lower tangents, all without sounding like it was being compressed to my ears. Don't know for sure if it'll stay yet, but on light settings, it was doing what I wanted. I'm an endorser but my pedal collection is Cutthroat Island, and I would rather do without a comp than use one I don't like, even if I have a clear use for one. And not even Ampeg pedals are safe from being axed. Besides, it was created before Yamaha bought Ampeg, and it's not like it'll hurt their feelings if I drop it. So please don't construe this as a "plug thread." I have a legit question.
Now I certainly haven't tried every comp out there, including a lot of the high end pedal comps available these days, but other than occasional high end tube compressors, my favorite compressor for recording has been a Waves RCL plugin set to optical mode. Sure, it's a digital recreation of an optical comp, but it's really good, and the Opto Comp reminded me a lot of it. But I don't know that I ever owned an optical comp before, and the RCL is to my knowledge the closest I've gotten to one in the past.
So is my liking the Opto Comp and RCL set to opto a result of liking optical comps in general, or have I simply found two comps I like with the method of compression being unrelated to why I like them? Stop me before I spring for an LA-2A!
Coincidentally, an Ampeg Opto Comp showed up a week ago as a little holiday bonus. Liked it enough at home to give it a shot with the band last night, seemed to give me lots of dynamic range while subtly affecting upper and lower tangents, all without sounding like it was being compressed to my ears. Don't know for sure if it'll stay yet, but on light settings, it was doing what I wanted. I'm an endorser but my pedal collection is Cutthroat Island, and I would rather do without a comp than use one I don't like, even if I have a clear use for one. And not even Ampeg pedals are safe from being axed. Besides, it was created before Yamaha bought Ampeg, and it's not like it'll hurt their feelings if I drop it. So please don't construe this as a "plug thread." I have a legit question.
Now I certainly haven't tried every comp out there, including a lot of the high end pedal comps available these days, but other than occasional high end tube compressors, my favorite compressor for recording has been a Waves RCL plugin set to optical mode. Sure, it's a digital recreation of an optical comp, but it's really good, and the Opto Comp reminded me a lot of it. But I don't know that I ever owned an optical comp before, and the RCL is to my knowledge the closest I've gotten to one in the past.
So is my liking the Opto Comp and RCL set to opto a result of liking optical comps in general, or have I simply found two comps I like with the method of compression being unrelated to why I like them? Stop me before I spring for an LA-2A!
