• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Why you shouldn't pay in full upfront for a custom build

J.Wolf

Supporting Member
Commercial User
Apr 29, 2003
9,074
9,790
Asheville, NC
www.facebook.com
Disclosures
Contributor- Bass Musician Magazine | Marketing Manager- Trickfish Amplification
Im gonna put this here, in hopes that it is helpful to someone along the way, ordering a custom bass. There's been a theme I've seen more and more recently about problems with delivery of custom orders, and they seem to follow a trend.

Essentially: Pay the deposit, no more, (and of course) no less. Typically this will be between 1/3 and 1/2 of the total price, due at the time of order to get your order solidified. The remainder due upon completion and imminent shipment of the bass. This total cost should hold, barring any changes in your order along the way. If the builder raises their prices sometime between your order and its delivery date, you should be able to expect that the cost at the time of your order is the cost you will pay. Price increases should only apply to orders placed after the time of the price increase.

Paying more than the deposit, either as an act of generosity/pseudophilanthropy, or an assumption that the builder will fast track, or put more effort into your bass out of appreciation is misplaced. You have an agreement: you pay the agreed upon amount at the set intervals, they make your bass to the specs you agreed on, in roughly the time they quoted it would be done.

Why do I say this? I have noticed about a half dozen cases of basses (from certain builders) that just dont ever seem to get done, for years and years beyond the quoted times. These builders seem to be delivering other basses during this time that were ordered after the orders in question, and the orders in question, by and large, are not super custom or requiring specialty parts that delay the build. In almost all of these situations Im referencing, the orders were paid in full upfront.

So what is happening? I would posit - and not to throw any builders under bus (notice im not naming names, and I think this should stay this way in this thread as its more a conceptual thing than an invitation to flame someone): the standard structure allows for builders to accept a non refundable deposit which protects them in case you ghost or cant pay when it comes time to deliver. the balance due upon completion ensures they get it done and prioritize fulfilling the agreement so they can be made whole on the project.

I do NOT mean to say that any of the builders in question are bad actors, or acting in bad faith in intention. What I think, is that life happens, money gets spent on overhead almost before it lands in their hands, and builders in survival mode force themselves or are forced into situations where they may be chasing "new money" as opposed to money they already have received. It's sucks, and I try to find ways to be empathetic, but I also feel for generous customers who feel like theyve gone above and beyond to support their builders, only to be strung along for years.

So yeah, I'm sure this raises big feelings from all sides. Maybe the info I've been getting is anecdotal and not reflective of the larger picture. Maybe you paid in full and got the bass of your dreams in record time. Thats fantastic. Im just trying to paint the picture that these systems and standards for these processes exist for a reason, and contain the correct checks and balances to make sure everyone is accountable to their agreements, when dozens of hours and thousands of dollars are on the line.

hope someone finds this helpful.
 
Last edited:
Good post. I know who you’re referring to. ;)

More than one, I’m referring to a handful of small builders who do really amazing work but struggle with the delivery aspect
 
Last edited:
This is good advice - pay when you're supposed to pay, not more or less. I teach privately, and for me the timing is different; all students pay in advance. This does an amazing job of filtering out the time wasters, and no more situations where somebody is in my house counting out coins on the table.
 
Im gonna put this here, in hopes that it is helpful to someone along the way, ordering a custom bass. There's been a theme I've seen more and more recently about problems with delivery of custom orders, and they seem to follow a trend.

Essentially: Pay the deposit, no more, (and of course) no less. Typically this will be between 1/3 and 1/2 of the total price, due at the time of order to get your order solidified. The remainder due upon completion and imminent shipment of the bass. This total cost should hold, barring any changes in your order along the way. If the builder raises their prices sometime between your order and its delivery date, you should be able to expect that the cost at the time of your order is the cost you will pay. Price increases should only apply to orders placed after the time of the price increase.

Paying more than the deposit, either as an act of generosity/pseudophilanthropy, or an assumption that the builder will fast track, or put more effort into your bass out of appreciation is misplaced. You have an agreement: you pay the agreed upon amount at the set intervals, they make your bass to the specs you agreed on, in roughly the time they quoted it would be done.

Why do I say this? I have noticed about a half dozen cases of basses (from certain builders) that just dont ever seem to get done, for years and years beyond the quoted times. These builders seem to be delivering other basses during this time that were ordered after the orders in question, and the orders in question, by and large, are not super custom or requiring specialty parts that delay the build. In almost all of these situations Im referencing, the orders were paid in full upfront.

So what is happening? I would posit - and not to throw any builders under bus (notice im not naming names, and I think this should stay this way in this thread as its more a conceptual thing than an invitation to flame someone): the standard structure allows for builders to accept a non refundable deposit which protects them in case you ghost or cant pay when it comes time to deliver. the balance due upon completion ensures they get it done and prioritize fulfilling the agreement so they can be made whole on the project.

I do NOT mean to say that any of the builders in question are bad actors, or acting in bad faith in intention. What I think, is that life happens, money gets spent on overhead almost before it lands in their hands, and builders in survival mode force themselves or are forced into situations where they may be chasing "new money" as opposed to money they already have received. It's sucks, and I try to find ways to be empathetic, but I also feel for generous customers who feel like theyve gone above and beyond to support their builders, only to be strung along for years.

So yeah, I'm sure this raises big feelings from all sides. Maybe the info I've been getting is anecdotal and not reflective of the larger picture. Maybe you paid in full and got the bass of your dreams in record time. Thats fantastic. Im just trying to paint the picture that these systems and standards for these processes exist for a reason, and contain the correct checks and balances to make sure everyone is accountable to their agreements, when dozens of hours and thousands of dollars are on the line.

hope someone finds this helpful.

So, you're saying don't give the builder all the carrots to start with - save a few as incentive to actually finish?
 
So, you're saying don't give the builder all the carrots to start with - save a few as incentive to actually finish?

More like, just do the deal as it was designed to be done through decades of trial and error. There's a reason this is the model that 90% of custom instrument builders have settled on.

Otherwise, it reminds me a little of the thing where someone stops in oncoming traffic to let you turn left in front of them, causing potential issues/danger for the people around them, out of a desire to be nice or polite. Just do the thing we're all supposed to do, and it'll be fine, there's a reason there are some rules of the road. Bad analogy but it makes me think of that thing, which is a pet peeve for me. lol. Dont be polite and cause a crash, just do the normal thing and it will all work out better, almost always.
 
I really don't know why people are afraid to name names. Maybe they have a build and the thinking is that if I name names, then my order will delayed even longer out of spite?

It's not my dirty laundry to air. If I were the customer in this scenario, that would be a different deal
 
It's not my dirty laundry to air. If I were the customer in this scenario, that would be a different deal

Apologies, wasn't meaning you specifically. Just in general when a thread like this comes up, or something with bad service, etc, people usually don't want to name names. But yeah, this is a typical story arc of the struggling luthier. Become popular, take in lots of orders, eventually spending new order money to complete older orders, economic downswing, orders slow leaving the older orders in limbo. I guess that's the dilemma of someone posting about an issue. If you name names, fewer people are going to place orders and that leaves your order in limbo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop
I really don't know why people are afraid to name names. Maybe they have a build and the thinking is that if I name names, then my order will delayed even longer out of spite?

I made the mistake of paying up front for a build with Stoneman guitars in 2006. I based it on knowing the guy for years.

I think a thread like this is helpful to remind people to stick to the script when dealing.
 
Apologies, wasn't meaning you specifically. Just in general when a thread like this comes up, or something with bad service, etc, people usually don't want to name names. But yeah, this is a typical story arc of the struggling luthier. Become popular, take in lots of orders, eventually spending new order money to complete older orders, economic downswing, orders slow leaving the older orders in limbo. I guess that's the dilemma of someone posting about an issue. If you name names, fewer people are going to place orders and that leaves your order in limbo.

there are a decent number of warning threads about particular Luthiers. If you search their name on talk bass it usually comes up pretty quick. On the one hand, I think it’s a nice feedback mechanism to make sure that people have a heads up about what they might be getting into, on the other hand, all of those “online user review“ type formats are ripe for misunderstandings and misinformation. Sometimes if you drill down into the situation, it’s because somebody change the specs of their order or something similar. Unreasonable expectations are always problematic. But so is being shifty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop
It's not my dirty laundry to air. If I were the customer in this scenario, that would be a different deal

There's a big difference between "I ordered a bass from Z and A, B, and C happened," and "I heard someone ordered a bass from Z and A, B, and C happened." And I believe you are, rightly and correctly, addressing that difference.

And this thread is a good reminder - once you've paid in full there is no financial incentive for the work to be finished. Not just ordering a bass, but in a lot of situations in life. If circumstances remove other incentives to finish from the equation you can be left with an empty wallet and empty hands - sometimes with no path forward.