• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

CuteCube² Guitar - Play-in System for String Instruments

It is endorsed by this guy here ...

467px-Brian_Williams_Tribeca_2009.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spectrum
UPDATE!

Just got back from gig and played a couple of notes on the JB, it already woke up after 3 days of treatment.

Much more balanced, stable bottom, sweet sound and way better response. I could take it to a gig now!

Here the two files for comparison.

BEFORE TREATMENT MARCH 5th 2015



AFTER 3 DAYS OF TREATMENT MARCH 8th 2015



I'll post the next recording on coming thursday :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smurf_Byte
This is classic. Although I don't enjoy the mythology of these types of threads as much as the PURELY facetious ones (like the Tortloaf and Mothman threads.) At least nobody's getting fleeced in those, just entertained.
 
I did the "you have got to be joking" head-shake when I read your post. Thanks for clarifying.
I spotted it immediately but I've had training. Although in this case it was subtle, the lack of exclamation points suggests sarcasm. Ex: 'Really. That's amazing.' In this example you can almost hear the pitch dropping as the words are spoken. Now, sometimes over - punctuating can convey the same message but with a somewhat malicious bent : 'Really?! That's amazing!!!' It's a delicate balance to get it right and one can be forgiven for missing it.
 
I hear a difference, or at least I think I do. And (or but) I'm half deaf, the half above the mids. But I cannot say the difference I hear is dramatic, not purely subjective, or even statistically significant (might be within the "natural variability of the workload" as we geeks might say). So at the moment, I still kind of want to believe, but still kind of can't and don't. Waiting for the next set.
 
I hear a difference. But the second track is a bit louder and brighter, leading me to believe it was played a bit harder, with a bit more gusto. Of course I can't say for sure, but that's my impression. As was noted earlier, it's not going to be possible to tell whether the difference is in the player, the bass, or the listener.

I seem to remember that some company had a robot player that could be programmed to play the notes with a repeatable phrasing and force. That would certainly help.
 
I hear a difference. But the second track is a bit louder and brighter, leading me to believe it was played a bit harder, with a bit more gusto. Of course I can't say for sure, but that's my impression. As was noted earlier, it's not going to be possible to tell whether the difference is in the player, the bass, or the listener.
My money is on the player. What's amazing to me is the PSMJ (pseudoscientific mumbo-jumbo) that manages to pass for science these days. Can I interest anyone in a $485 wooden volume knob for their power amplifier? :D
 
Last edited:
You can hear such a major difference. You should probably do this on various woods so we can see what tonewood opens up the most after vibrating.

/sarcasm
Actually, well, yes, non-sarcastically - if one was approaching this scientifically (which I wish someone would to prove or utterly debunk), that's exactly what one would proceed to do, under controlled conditions. But we all know that's not likely to happen, not while there's money to be made.

popcorn.gif