Yeah, I get that would be the ideal scenario for direct, granular control of any parameter. And if you can do that, you can obviously control a wider range of things on the Anagram. I'm pointing out that while the approach you're describing gives more user-customization options, it's not necessarily more efficient in terms of setup - especially if most people are using it for more basic functions like toggling blocks on/off, boosting/cutting drive, etc. In the scenario you're describing, I still have to hook my MC6 Pro up to my computer, assign Channels/CC commands to any given parameter or function, then assign that to a footswitch/action in the MIDI controller for each preset. With the current setup, I can just assign the quick knobs and switches to corresponding footswitches/commands in the MIDI controller and do most of my tweaking, setup, and binding directly on the anagram. I also see this being beneficial if you're at a rehearsal, gig, session, etc. and you want to tweak things without having your laptop present.
