• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Darkglass Just Unveiled Speaker Cabs!

Wouldn't it be redundant to have a Microtubes 900/500 if you already have a B3K and a VMT pedal? I'm just saying, that's half of the amp head.

Possibly but not totally. Depends on if you want to run the clean tone as your clean tone. I just bought a 900 and I use a low gain blend of the Microtubes engine as part of my clean tone, and other pedals for my distortion. I don't care for the higher gain of the B3K nor VMT, so I wouldn't use the pristine clean channel then kick the Microtubes on for higher gain. I could see someone wanting to have a slightly warm/dirty tone from the head, then pushing it with a B3K or VMT pedal, if that's the sound they want.
 
Possibly but not totally. Depends on if you want to run the clean tone as your clean tone. I just bought a 900 and I use a low gain blend of the Microtubes engine as part of my clean tone, and other pedals for my distortion. I don't care for the higher gain of the B3K nor VMT, so I wouldn't use the pristine clean channel then kick the Microtubes on for higher gain. I could see someone wanting to have a slightly warm/dirty tone from the head, then pushing it with a B3K or VMT pedal, if that's the sound they want.

Kudos, Monster-- that was well-thought-out!
 
  • Like
Reactions: monsterthompson
Kudos, Monster-- that was well-thought-out!
@monsterthompson is quite good at that.... :D

Those cabs must sound pretty magnificent, or geared towards hardcore Darkglass users. The price and weight of either cab puts them out of consideration for me. I'm sure they're gorgeous sounding, but I'm sure liking other lower priced, lighter, high powered cabs coming out nowadays...
 
@monsterthompson is quite good at that.... :D

Those cabs must sound pretty magnificent, or geared towards hardcore Darkglass users. The price and weight of either cab puts them out of consideration for me. I'm sure they're gorgeous sounding, but I'm sure liking other lower priced, lighter, high powered cabs coming out nowadays...

Aw, shucks ;)
 
Now that I got your attention LOL... do you have any idea what would make these cabs so exceptional? Not trying to be a smart aleck. There are so many great cabs out there and I don't know anything about Darkglass....

The Darkglass logo on them. LOL!

Not to be a jerk, but so far that's the bulk of what we know. DG gear is premium priced, and generally finished accordingly, so I suspect these cabs will look spectacular.

I have to assume that there's a DG sound they are trying to achieve, because they aren't seemingly pushing the limits of light-weight design like a Barefaced or Greenboy. Until I hear them, I can't say much more. I know that certain educated folks around these parts can make better educated guesses about the porting and cab volume, or what drivers are being used than I can.

It does seem that the idea could be to offer a "modular" rig option by having the 4 Ohm 410 and 8 Ohm 210, for a 2.67 Ohm 610 stack, seeing as the heads are 2 Ohm stable (well, the 900 is, and I'm assuming the new one is, but I just glanced over the specs briefly and I might've missed that - EDIT - I see it is 4 Ohm min.).

Just gonna sit back and watch the story unfold.
 
Last edited:
Not to be a jerk, but so far that's the bulk of what we know. DG gear is premium priced, and generally finished accordingly, so I suspect these cabs will look spectacular.

I have to assume that there's a DG sound they are trying to achieve, because they aren't seemingly pushing the limits of light-weight design like a Barefaced or Greenboy. Until I hear them, I can't say much more. I know that certain educated folks around these parts can make better educated guesses about the porting and cab volume, or what drivers are being used than I can.

It does seem that the idea could be to offer a "modular" rig option by having the 4 Ohm 410 and 8 Ohm 210, for a 2.67 Ohm 610 stack, seeing as the heads are 2 Ohm stable (well, the 900 is, and I'm assuming the new one is, but I just glanced over the specs briefly and I might've missed that).

Just gonna sit back and watch the story unfold.
As will I my friend. Maybe @Passinwind or @agedhorse might know more than I do...
 
  • Like
Reactions: monsterthompson
@monsterthompson makes good points, for example if you get a Barefaced 210 it’s $799 shipped to the US so $200 cheaper, will handle 500w and above for a clean sound, lighter, and if you run very little distortion like our man here would potentially be a great match for either DG heads or other heads. For the 900 flip the switch and it will attenuate the power.
You could look at Form Factor cabs for example, same config and power handling in ceramic or Neo depending on what weight you want, made in California.
The interesting thing is that I think thenCans are made in the UK, is it Barefaced doing it for them?!
It’s a bit of a weird one and definitely for the die hard distortion DG crowd to my mind, as there are a load of credible alternatives in this speaker format for anything else.
 
It does seem that the idea could be to offer a "modular" rig option by having the 4 Ohm 410 and 8 Ohm 210, for a 2.67 Ohm 610 stack, seeing as the heads are 2 Ohm stable (well, the 900 is, and I'm assuming the new one is, but I just glanced over the specs briefly and I might've missed that).

Looks like it is 4 Ohms min. for the new head. Still looks pretty sweet.
 
Not to be a jerk, but so far that's the bulk of what we know. DG gear is premium priced, and generally finished accordingly, so I suspect these cabs will look spectacular.

I have to assume that there's a DG sound they are trying to achieve, because they aren't seemingly pushing the limits of light-weight design like a Barefaced or Greenboy. Until I hear them, I can't say much more. I know that certain educated folks around these parts can make better educated guesses about the porting and cab volume, or what drivers are being used than I can.

It does seem that the idea could be to offer a "modular" rig option by having the 4 Ohm 410 and 8 Ohm 210, for a 2.67 Ohm 610 stack, seeing as the heads are 2 Ohm stable (well, the 900 is, and I'm assuming the new one is, but I just glanced over the specs briefly and I might've missed that).

Just gonna sit back and watch the story unfold.

Thanks for your input! I have had my eyes on the M900 for a bit, but never actually ordered one to test it. What is that new amp you were speaking of? Have they announced that yesterday together with the cab series?
 
Thanks for your input! I have had my eyes on the M900 for a bit, but never actually ordered one to test it. What is that new amp you were speaking of? Have they announced that yesterday together with the cab series?

Hit their main page. There's a 500w version of the head. 4 Ohm. Reduced EQ options (only 2 options for the hi & lo instead of three). I'm assuming smaller and lighter, but I need to sleep, so I'll check specifics tomorrow :)

I just got a used 900 and have been pretty happy with it. I'm assuming the 500 would sound equally good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DavetheDude
Hit their main page. There's a 500w version of the head. 4 Ohm. Reduced EQ options (only 2 options for the hi & lo instead of three). I'm assuming smaller and lighter, but I need to sleep, so I'll check specifics tomorrow :)

I just got a used 900 and have been pretty happy with it. I'm assuming the 500 would sound equally good.

Looks like it's equal to the M900, save the arrangement of knobs.

FrontM500.jpg