• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Dingwall Combustion Nashville Edition

From Brian at the Low End

IMG_7683.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaxSpinrun
Interesting that they've gone back to a blend.
When I added a neck pickup to my Z2, I added a blend pot - eventually replacing the pickup selector switch with a second blend pot.
For me, two blend pots are intuitive, but I can see how the switch + blend would make more sense for most users.

I will say, my experience with blend pots was improved enormously by the threads about using ungrounded blend pots.
(Running them ungrounded avoids the loading that Dingwall used a switch to avoid.)
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I don’t get what they’re doing with the blend / switch.
I have no experience with the Nashville basses, but what I got from Sheldon's comment on the video is that the blend enables you to solo or combine any of the three pickups.

My dual-blend setup allows the same flexibility, and it gives some really useful combinations you just can't get with selector switches.
 
Wouldn't just using a 6 way rotary allow for that any way? The blend and switch seems convoluted.

1. Bridge
2. Bridge/mid
3. Bridge/neck
4. Mid
5. Mid/neck
6. Neck

Only thing you can't do is all 3 at once I guess.

I also never find the in-between area on my blend pot basses to be substantially different.
 
I have no experience with the Nashville basses, but what I got from Sheldon's comment on the video is that the blend enables you to solo or combine any of the three pickups.

My dual-blend setup allows the same flexibility, and it gives some really useful combinations you just can't get with selector switches.
He says that the blend is between bridge and neck, flip the switch and you can get all 3 pickups. So, I would guess that tuns the middle pickup on? But then one of the switch positions is for P tone. Not sure how that would differ from the blend rolled forward. Maybe it's a quicker way to go from P to a J setting? Dunno.
 
I also never find the in-between area on my blend pot basses to be substantially different
Interesting! I'm the opposite & almost ALL of my favorite blends are 60/40.
Due to phase cancellation, a blend at 50/50 will usually have some mid-scoop.

My bass just has a 2-band (bass and treble) EQ.
So along with setting the overall tonality, I find that the blend pots also play a huge part in shaping the midrange.
 
Interesting! I'm the opposite & almost ALL of my favorite blends are 60/40.
Due to phase cancellation, a blend at 50/50 will usually have some mid-scoop.

My bass just has a 2-band (bass and treble) EQ.
So along with setting the overall tonality, I find that the blend pots also play a huge part in shaping the midrange.
I agree about the mid scoop in the center, but I find favoring one pickup even slightly doesn't sound THAT different from the favored pickup full on. My basses with the active EMG blends are a bit better.

I thought a rotary + blend would be cool, wiring it so that the blend is on only in the circuit in the switch positions that have 2 pickups. That's above my pay grade though. Seems like a best of both worlds approach.