TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Has anyone tried that method successfully on flats?
Has anyone tried that method successfully on flats?
I did a test of your method on a Dunlop flatwwound .105 that was already short scale off my Mikro. I started where the silk started ( i'd removed the silk itself even though you wouldn't encounter silk with the beginning of it being past the Mikro tuners with long scale strings, just for an exercise in doing it). Anyhow I ended up snipping some wrapping and I got a flat winding seperation. So I abandoned it. I like the look of peg end silks anyhow. I'd already started down the path of shortening strings via the ball end. In this case, I wasn't shortening them per se, because they were already shorties. I just used as a platform for a modified technique that I got the idea from here The Official Short Scale Bass Club -- Part 2I tried it once, and it quickly came apart. I've considered trying it again with physically crimping the string instead of glue and heatsink, or possibly spot welding. When I tried Jim Dunlop Flatwound Short Scale strings, they worked perfectly for me, so I just went with those instead.
My cutters work on both long and short scale. Pro tip, you can always cut shorter but you can’t make it longer.
My bass below. And I 100% admit to it, I grabbed the wrong set of strings out of my bin and cut one before I realized these were long scale on my short scale bass. These are TI flats. And they have been perfect for going on 3 years of heavy use. I know better. I still have the short scale set I bought and meant to use lol. But they are fine.Have you tried Ray's method? Do you see it as superfluous? If so, do you just cut long scale flatwounds to length on a short scale and wind on irrespective of fat wrap around post? If so have you had any hassles with flat overwrap coming apart
Yes, they have two sets in short scale out in the U.S at least. The heavier of the two being 50-110. 110 is still too small a gauge for a Mikro in tunings below standard E. Hence string shortening and reducing diameter of wrap around post and certainly taking flatwound outer wrap out of the equation. No way you want to wrap a gargantuan flat non tapered section of string around the small diameter post on a Mikro in particular. Some get away with a TI doing it but I doubt the gauge is more than 100. Doubt anyone is game enough to blow a 136 doing itI think Ernie ball has cobalt flats in short scale now. Need to go try those.
Yes, they have two sets in short scale out in the U.S at least. The heavier of the two being 50-110. 110 is still too small a gauge for a Mikro in tunings below standard E. Hence string shortening and reducing diameter of wrap around post and certainly taking flatwound outer wrap out of the equation. No way you want to wrap a gargantuan flat non tapered section of string around the small diameter post on a Mikro in particular. Some get away with a TI doing it but I doubt the gauge is more than 100. Doubt anyone is game enough to blow a 136 doing it
This string shortening thing opens up more options for using a gauge over 110, without having to buy a whole set of 5ivers to get. Eg. If you like Chromes, the 132 in long scale is out of bounds on short scale basses. Like wise if you like rotosound 77 flats the 125 single is only in long scale. Who wants to buy a whole set to just get one or maybe two strings
p.s make sure not to make collar with heat shrink so large in diameter that it won't pass thru bridge holes. If glue collar turns out a bit too large you can carefully sand it to reduce diameter or alternatively make bridge holes a little bigger
Credit where credit due. The method was originally posted by the OP ray_castro. I take no credit for. He may have tried this on flatwounds by now. Now that I have a good handle on this technique I will likely ditch the original approach I had of shortening the string at the other end, even though I think it is less rigmarole as far as retaining the original silks if any and not having to unwind much or find you can't fit a glue and heat shrink collar thru a bridge hole. Those are the pros. The cons are that in the back of your mind you think the string will pull out of its glue blob at the end of the string. With ray's approach you can relax. Maybe I just do both . Neither approach seems to affect the string via tuning stability or killing the string sound wise as far as I can tell. Weird as it sounds, it is quite satisfying unwinding string wrap layers.Yeah I guess there isn’t market for low-B short scale. Definitely need a heavy gauge. Your method may be the only way to go.
I do have regular long scale EB flats on two 30” scale bases and the E and A wraps the full thickness on the tuning peg. Good for several months now but I don’t need a .135 either.


One more thought: instead of locking down the ball end, I held the string with vice grips over tape near where I put the super glue- just enough pressure to hold the string without doing any damage. It worked well, allowed me to use needle nose pliers to pull the wrap wire. I did most of the unwrapping by hand, just uncoiling it- slow but effective.Ah, I really like the shrink wrap. I recently did this process with a Bass VI conversion and Fender Super 250 strings, but left the exposed wire just beyond the super glue. So far it's worked beautifully but it's not as clean looking. I also kept the middle wind on the 0.100 E string. So far so good, but I'll update this thread if I ever run into a problem.
I have a different and, I believe, much easier solution to this problem. I went to my nearest home improvement store and bought a couple of electrical copper lugs for 14 ga wire (about $1.50 each). I put them in a vise and ground off the flat lug part so that it was just the cylinder. I put my long scale string on the bass so the silk is in the correct position on the headstock above the nut. The ball end is now sticking out from the back of the bridge since the string is too long. I cut the ball end off the string and slide the copper lug on the cut end of the string up to where it meets the bridge and tighten it down holding onto the lug with some large pliers and using a flat screwdriver to tighten the screw. I snip off the excess string from the back and I’m done. The lugs are reusable when you change strings and I have never had one slip off. It’s fast and easy and has allowed me to use Cobalt Flats on my Hofner Ignition Club Bass and they have made it into a beast. Before I came up with this workaround, I broke an E string and an A string trying to get them to work on this bass since the unwound portion of many strings will not bend sharply enough around these tiny tuners without breaking. I suppose you could also add some super glue to the new “ball end” for added security but I’ve used this method for three years without a failure.View attachment 5144716View attachment 5144717