• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Do some basses just need 20+ years before their good?

totally depends on the instrument, builder, wood, etc. I was shopping for a Gibson L5 many years ago and looked at several old ones, trying to avoid the $12000 price tag of a new, custom order. I was surprised that none of them seemed to be what I expected a vintage guitar to be as far as tonal character, wood resonance, etc...nothing like a vintage acoustic for example. And a couple of the vintage L5's were pretty much the equivalent of dead firewood. I passed on all of them, even the one that had an asking price of only $1500, which was the deadest wood of all. With another comparison, though, my NYC Sadowsky P was stellar from birth and set the standard for all others to follow...new or used, worn or vintage. But like said, nostalgia comes at a price.

I feel the same way about a lot of the vintage Martin guitars I have played. I got so excited that they were 60s and Brazilian rosewood and all that. Honestly, most of them sounded pretty average. Same goes for many 60s strats I have played. It is cool that they are old, I'll admit that. However, old does not equal good in many cases.

Anyone in SoCal have a 70s fender bass? I would love to play one... Can't recall ever playing one

I got a Sadowsky for the same reason bigbass did. It is stellar from the get-go.
 
Most US guitar-makers that existed in the '50s and '60s slumped a bit in the '70s (arguably, Rickenbacker was the only major exception) for various reasons, a major one being that demand for guitars was off the charts then. Fender and Gibson changed hands to clueless corporations. Martin was passed down to a playboy. And they were grinding out units like crazy, without the benefit of the kind of manufacturing technology that allows for greater consistency between instruments. I have owned/still own numerous '60s and '70s Fender basses, and find them to be unique individuals, much moreso than today's American Standards, say. I have some excellent '70s basses and got rid of a few dogs. Some were fairly pristine, some beat to hell. I doubt any of them got noticeably better-sounding with age, though.
 
I leave this thread for just a few days... LOL.

I do have to say that nostalgia is powerful and mind games play a big part in some thing's appeal, but I think I see a trend here that depending on the era QC across the industry really makes a big difference just generally. "Coolness factor" however is in the eyes, ears and hands of the beholder.

So nothing new under the sun eh? ;)
 
Nostalgia helps, the rise in cost of older instruments, etc.

I have some 70's made instruments I got used--but for decent prices (& many years ago)

I also agree that time has weeded out many of the dogs
 

Latest posts