TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
What kind of bass is that? So beautiful!
I agree with this. I think natural finish looks best when there is no pickguard and minimal plastic. Pickguards, especially tort or pearloid, can be a great accent to translucent finishes.Great, as long as there's no plastic and especially no pickguard.
It's great for furniture, not basses.
Why not?
I like a nice natural finish. OTOH black bass?... meh, too many out there.I have a squier 70s jazz bass with a natural finish and I think it looks kind of unappealing. What do you guys think of natural wood color? (I'm going to sand my bass down and repaint it, maybe black)
It's just my opinion, but they look incomplete. I own 7 basses, all with beautiful finishes. None are natural. The term"coffee table bass" exists for a reason. A lot of folks like their instruments to look like furniture. More power to them. I'll never own one.
(Eastwood Flying V Bass), with a shiny clear finish. Although the Basswood body does have some halfway decent grain pattern - not always the case with that stuff - the fact that it's made of about 5 different pieces is... not the "U" word, exactly; it just doesn't look as good as it might have, otherwise. If you're right handed, it also comes in black; very nice. If you're a lefty like me? What you see is what you get...
Matt finish over nice-but-not-busy-looking Walnut and Maple. And, this '78 Kramer
, also walnut and maple. If all my other basses were something like these two in appearance? Yeah, I'd be pretty happy... What I do find unappealing, OTOH, are ridiculously busy looking pieces of wood. And, IMO, they're particularly unsightly if they're finished in some outre' translucent color. As is any other piece of wood, AFAIC. But, that's just me; like they say, differences of opinion...