• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Do you prefer rear ported, front ported cabs or sealed bass cabs?

Do you prefer Rear Ported, Front Ported or Sealed cabs??

  • Rear Ported

    Votes: 15 6.7%
  • Front Ported

    Votes: 101 44.9%
  • Sealed

    Votes: 58 25.8%
  • Don't care...

    Votes: 51 22.7%

  • Total voters
    225
Unless your cab is up against a wall (blocking the rear port), you can get anything from punchy, articulate bass to pillowy, muddy bass from any of these. The alignment (driver TS parameters/cab volume/cab tuning) has much more impact on bass tone than front or rear ports (vented), or sealed. Choose a tone, not a design. Who cares how you get it (except cab designers and nerdy types). :-)
 
Always played front ported til 11 years ago when I bought Markbass rear ported. Both can sound good, but I've had more trouble placing the Markbass cabs, or so it "seems." Hell, I don't know.

Rear ported couples more efficiently to the room boundaries than front ported. This can be designed for by using an overdamped alignment, but that can sound a little thin when the cab is placed well away from room boundaries.
 
Rear ported couples more efficiently to the room boundaries than front ported. This can be designed for by using an overdamped alignment, but that can sound a little thin when the cab is placed well away from room boundaries.
This kind of contradicts you earlier statement, I agree you can generally tune things to your liking. However, as you just stated rear ports can be a bit less consistent room to room due to barrier effect. It's nice to not have to mess with eq as much to achieve consistent results (especially when using amps with very limited features like the Alembic preamps).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zbysek
I have used sealed SVT cabs for years and like them, I also use front ported B-15 cabs here and like them and am using a Laney rear ported 410 cab here in Lima and like that also although it would be the third choice out of the three. I think it also depends of the kind of music I'm playing and if I want a lot of nice bottom or not. sealed cabs are tighter sounding and ported cabs have a freer easier bottom end. I chose I don't care.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pedulla-Player
Thanks to those of you that actually gave an answer to my question.

As far as the others go, lets just say that I was raised to be respectful and that if you don't have something decent to say - don't say it.

I've seen other threads were a TB member asked a simple honest question and was bombarded by trolls. I felt bad for the person, didn't make a comment and exited the thread. Now that I am one of those being attacked by sarcastic and mean-spirited responses to my question, I definitely know how they feel. <--- Not very good.

If you want to be funny with a response go to the 'Bass Humor & Gig Stories' section of the TB site.

If what you have to say that doesn't add value to the thread. Don't say it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jscriv and D.A.R.K.
This kind of contradicts you earlier statement, I agree you can generally tune things to your liking. However, as you just stated rear ports can be a bit less consistent room to room due to barrier effect. It's nice to not have to mess with eq as much to achieve consistent results (especially when using amps with very limited features like the Alembic preamps).

There is a little difference, but it doesn't really matter, at least to me. When used well away from room boundaries front ported, rear ported and sealed will all have less boundary coupling. Just adjust to taste with a tweak of the bass control.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pedulla-Player