• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Do you prefer smaller or larger radius?

smaller or larger radius?

  • Smaller

    Votes: 68 26.9%
  • Larger

    Votes: 113 44.7%
  • indifferent

    Votes: 52 20.6%
  • depends on style.

    Votes: 20 7.9%

  • Total voters
    253
If larger radius translates to a thinner neck front-to-back then I'm a happy camper. Nothing worse (for me) than trying to wrap my left hand around a baseball bat.
 
Everyone has different hands.

I have small hands. Maybe having small hands thus being forced to learn how to adapt is why I play narrow and thin necks (Jazz), wide and thick necks ('50s style P necks), necks between, and whatever fretboard radius.

This was my first unwieldy beast (one just like it) I started to learn on the '80s.

Link Removed
 
  • Like
Reactions: Killing Floor
I have small hands. Maybe having small hands thus being forced to learn how to adapt is why I play narrow and thin necks (Jazz), wide and thick necks ('50s style P necks), necks between, and whatever fretboard radius.

This was my first unwieldy beast (one just like it) I started to learn on the '80s.

Link Removed
Yes, we are all made differently. I can palm a basketball easily. I am more comfortable on chunky classic C type necks. I do find a larger radius (flatter) more natural for chords (bass and guitar) but this is all related to feel. I suppose one could adapt to play anything. I never looked at neck or board shape on specs for many years yet most of what I own are similar. Play what works for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grinderman
Yes, we are all made differently. I can palm a basketball easily. I am more comfortable on chunky classic C type necks. I do find a larger radius (flatter) more natural for chords (bass and guitar) but this is all related to feel. I suppose one could adapt to play anything. I never looked at neck or board shape on specs for many years yet most of what I own are similar. Play what works for you.

I've landed on 9-1/"R with 6230 or 6105 frets as my go-to satisfactory zone.
 
Hello mates!

Tell everybody WHAT, WHY and also HOW MUCH RADIUS?
To be honest... I've really never paid much attention to a bass neck's radius. It would have to be really small for me to even notice - and no bass I've ever played - much less the 25 I own now - had a neck radius that small. But, if I have to pick one that I prefer? Let's go with "whatever a Rick 4001's neck radius is", and leave it at that. It's the one I play the most, anyway...:whistle:
 
Hello mates!

Tell everybody WHAT, WHY and also HOW MUCH RADIUS?
A flatter radius equals easier and faster playing for me, but isn't needed so much on a J style neck. For me, a P or J style with a 12" radius plays faster than a typical 7-1/4. Alembic uses a 12" radius, and I believe some Sadowsky have a 12" radius, too. My Tyler is 16 or 18".
 
I had no I idea I cared about fretboard radius until I ordered a 5 string G&L JB-5 that comes default with a 9.5" radius. I had owed many, many 5 string basses before this but they must have all had flatter radii because it really threw me off. It made it more difficult to play notes on the B and E string without inadvertently muting the higher strings.
I had this same experience with my JB5. My 12” radius L-2500 had the same spacing at the bridge but the JB5 felt like I had to reach around the fingerboard to reach the B string. I’ve since sold both as I’m playing all fours, two of which have 14” and one is 10”. I find them all comfortable but prefer the 12-14 range. I don’t think I’d buy a 5 string with under 12” radius though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chewy_B_i_T_s