• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Do you prefer smaller or larger radius?

smaller or larger radius?

  • Smaller

    Votes: 68 26.9%
  • Larger

    Votes: 113 44.7%
  • indifferent

    Votes: 52 20.6%
  • depends on style.

    Votes: 20 7.9%

  • Total voters
    253
Hello mates!

Tell everybody WHAT, WHY and also HOW MUCH RADIUS?
I'm pretty well stuck on a 7.25" radius. I bought a 1965 Jazz in 1966 and played it through high school and some college before going on the road with a nightclub touring group for 3 years. We played 5-nights a week, 50-weeks a year. So in 3 years that's about 750 performances. I got real use to that 60's Slim C-shape neck with 7.25" radius.

And then in 1976 our house was burglarized and they took all of my touring gear except for one of my two Atlas mic stands. Meanwhile Fender really screwed up the necks on the Jazz Bass. They were still the same size at the nut, but they were a lot thicker. And some had a fatter C-shape, some had a fat D-shape, and the fattest neck of all was the U-shape neck. They all felt terrible in my hands. Then finally in 1985 I found the bass I play now, which is a 1982 Jazz with a white bound maple neck. Took me almost 10-years, but I found one!

Was working part-time at a music store while I was going back to college and a guy traded it in. By this time I'd tried all 100 to 150 Fender Basses the store had and they were all thicker and uncomfortable. Then I pull this white Jazz off the wall, played a few runs with it and it just felt like home...so I bought it. So I'm really stuck on the 7.25" radius, at least on a 4-string. Even the Jazz Basses with the 9.5" radius that Fender went to in the mid-80's feel off to me.

I do have a 5-string that has a neck with a 12" radius - wider to accommodate the 5-strings but thankfully it is a slim neck and not fat! I'd prefer a more curved radius though. it's a LOT flatter than my Jazz neck is but I put up with it because of the extra string.

You know the whole reason they started putting flatter necks on guitars was so you didn't choke out the string when you were bending notes. I don't really do a lot of bending of bass notes. I remember the neck on the guitar Eddie Van Halen was using for his tapping and bending of notes and it was super flat like a classical acoustic guitar neck, certainly not made for playing chords on it. The higher arch of a smaller radius relieves a lot of tension across the back of the hand when playing barre chords on a 7.25" radius. Of course, bassist don't usually go around playing barre chords, but they also don't do a lot of bending notes either, so the 12" and flatter radius necks make no sense to me for a bass. YMMV...probably will!
 
  • Like
Reactions: bucephylus
I'm pretty well stuck on a 7.25" radius. I bought a 1965 Jazz in 1966 and played it through high school and some college before going on the road with a nightclub touring group for 3 years. We played 5-nights a week, 50-weeks a year. So in 3 years that's about 750 performances. I got real use to that 60's Slim C-shape neck with 7.25" radius.

And then in 1976 our house was burglarized and they took all of my touring gear except for one of my two Atlas mic stands. Meanwhile Fender really screwed up the necks on the Jazz Bass. They were still the same size at the nut, but they were a lot thicker. And some had a fatter C-shape, some had a fat D-shape, and the fattest neck of all was the U-shape neck. They all felt terrible in my hands. Then finally in 1985 I found the bass I play now, which is a 1982 Jazz with a white bound maple neck. Took me almost 10-years, but I found one!

Was working part-time at a music store while I was going back to college and a guy traded it in. By this time I'd tried all 100 to 150 Fender Basses the store had and they were all thicker and uncomfortable. Then I pull this white Jazz off the wall, played a few runs with it and it just felt like home...so I bought it. So I'm really stuck on the 7.25" radius, at least on a 4-string. Even the Jazz Basses with the 9.5" radius that Fender went to in the mid-80's feel off to me.

I do have a 5-string that has a neck with a 12" radius - wider to accommodate the 5-strings but thankfully it is a slim neck and not fat! I'd prefer a more curved radius though. it's a LOT flatter than my Jazz neck is but I put up with it because of the extra string.

You know the whole reason they started putting flatter necks on guitars was so you didn't choke out the string when you were bending notes. I don't really do a lot of bending of bass notes. I remember the neck on the guitar Eddie Van Halen was using for his tapping and bending of notes and it was super flat like a classical acoustic guitar neck, certainly not made for playing chords on it. The higher arch of a smaller radius relieves a lot of tension across the back of the hand when playing barre chords on a 7.25" radius. Of course, bassist don't usually go around playing barre chords, but they also don't do a lot of bending notes either, so the 12" and flatter radius necks make no sense to me for a bass. YMMV...probably will!
Nice reply ! I get your point . And I also like lower radius , narrow board , low string tension . I mean, all that means comfort to me .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rip Van Dan
giphy-gif.3866329
 
I would add to this that guitarists who now play bass probably like the smaller tighter radius and also play with their fretting hand more curved and finger joints more vertical than someone who started on bass or dbl bass and has their fretting hand more flat.

Of course there are always exceptions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Quills
Although I personally can't tell much difference from 7.25 to 12 when I actually play........ I like the flatter radius because the A and D string are not as far away from the pickups (the pickups have flat tops). Better balanced sound.
 
Although I personally can't tell much difference from 7.25 to 12 when I actually play........ I like the flatter radius because the A and D string are not as far away from the pickups (the pickups have flat tops). Better balanced sound.
If you use a P(roper) bass, you can angle the pickups to match the radius...:)

I wonder why Leo designed the Jazz pickups to be flat when the fretboard wasn't. Did the early Jazz basses have raised poles to match the radius?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bassdude51