TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I, being female, have smaller hands than a lot of bass players with their mighty paws. Counterintuitively, I find a five string to be much more forgiving for smaller hands, because you have a lot of key root notes on smaller frets closer to your body (C, D, G, E, etc). That way I can hold one position on the neck no matter what key I'm in and get around a lot more easily.I am "old school" and have never considered having more that 4 strings on a bass. I am, however, curious and open to opinions.
Why would you want and/or need more? What, if anything, am I missing? Is there a reason it wasn't common back in the day and if so, what changed?
Thoughts?
The title should have been, Why did you play a 5/6 vs a 4, not "Do you really need more than...."
The way this legitimate question is being asked suggests. that no one needs more than 4....
People on this website don't like being questioned.... maybe that is true for anything involving the human being....
...you get a call for a gig that requires a five string. that's basically why.27572808[/URL], member: 317196"]I am "old school" and have never considered having more that 4 strings on a bass. I am, however, curious and open to opinions.
Why would you want and/or need more? What, if anything, am I missing? Is there a reason it wasn't common back in the day and if so, what changed?
Thoughts?
I, being female, have smaller hands than a lot of bass players with their mighty paws. Counterintuitively, I find a five string to be much more forgiving for smaller hands, because you have a lot of key root notes on smaller frets closer to your body (C, D, G, E, etc). That way I can hold one position on the neck no matter what key I'm in and get around a lot more easily.
Also, I've always found D to be a weak point on a 4-string. I've got satifying low notes for just about every other key I find myself in, but D leaves me stranded with a root note that is higher than the patterns I play in that key for the 4, 5, etc. I like having that really low D to work off. I don't really use the lowest B or C much.
I never considered buying a 6-string until I started getting a bit better at playing leads. It is nice to have lots of accessible options including highs I never need playing bass lines, and they sound so pretty, like the equivalent of a mezzo-soprano.
I recently bought a four string again just because I wanted to get back to fundamentals, and also to reduce hand strain on certain songs that require a lot of my right hand. It was a Sadowsky 4-string, and I love the thing so much I'm selling it to get a Sadowsky 5-string. Once you play 5-string, it can be pretty hard to go back, because you have to rethink all your patterns. I guess I'm pretty much a 5-string player.
First, there are many threads on this.
My experience is this: I started on 4's. Then, after a couple years, I felt like I wanted to hit lower notes, so I bought a 5. That led to a couple of decades of playing primarily 5-ers, though I always kept a 4-string in the arsenal. Then, I discovered I could mute better and move around better on a 4, and now I play 4's with Hipshot Xtenders primarily, but I still keep a 5-string in the arsenal. Bottom line is, I rarely play exact bass lines--I always play lines that are either original (in the case of original tunes) or informed by the original (in the case of cover tunes). Depending on what/how I want to play, I'll select the instrument that sounds/feels/plays right for what I want to play.
I came to bass guitar from piano. You know, all the notes in a straight line.
So, bass guitar. Notes not in a straight line, and they overlap. I can play G Here, Here, Here, you get the idea.
Took a while to wrap my head around that.
When I did, I got tired of starting a figure HERE, and then part way through it, I had to slide up THERE to finish it.
Great points...
When fives came out, the little light came on. I could play a two octave scale ACROSS the fingerboard. Bingo! I started playing only fives in the late 80's and have never looked back, they just suit me best.
OK, the several extra low notes are fun IN THE RIGHT SPOT, but a bad reason to go from four to five.
The real advantage is playing across the fingerboard and the more choices in fingering one more string offers, and transposing is far more simple.
I see no reason why 4 is better than 5, 5 is better than 4, I GOT to have a six, etc. The important thing is to use whatever helps you make your best music, and only your opinion counts for you. I never understand how some cats think that how many strings your bass has is some sort of implied gage of your musical manhood.
Play what suits you.
I am "old school" and have never considered having more that 4 strings on a bass. I am, however, curious and open to opinions.
Why would you want and/or need more? What, if anything, am I missing? Is there a reason it wasn't common back in the day and if so, what changed?
Thoughts?