• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Does anyone else here dislike PJ basses?

I may turn my P into a sort of PJ.

I have an SX P and a spare J pickup laying about. I may have the J installed at some point, probably as close to the pickguard as I can get (about MM coil 1 location).

For starters I'd put a switch on the volume so that it selects one pickup or the other, rather than a blend.

I already have plenty of tone controls with treble and mid cut tone controls on the P so I'm more interested in having the bridge tone to work with rather than creating tone via blend. YMMV.

Otto
 
The Squier Jag is SS. Also the new MIM Mustangs are P/J. On both of these the J pickup seems to be a bit anemic for many people's taste.

Yes, I am not even considering the Squier or Fendor. If I ever get the patience to wait for the build time, I might actually reach out to Birdsong to see if they have any interest in a custom build that would be P/J. I don't think I've ever seen them do that.
 
I own two PJ basses. To be honest, the standard PJ configuration is pretty boring. Too many manufacturers reach for that pickup setup in a bid to add versatility, at the cost of originality and tonal character. It seems like a lazy way of upping the spec of a bass.

This is especially the case if you use generic P and J pickups. You get a bit of noise in the PJ setting, a lot of noise in the J setting, and no noise in the P setting. I find this annoying. One of my PJ basses has a Model P and J set, and the other has Seymour Duncan pickups (SPB-2 and STK-J2B). Both pickup sets are a compromise in some regards, because the stack and dual-coil J pickups don't have the 'true' J pickup tone. However I consider this a price worth paying for 100% noiseless operation on all settings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zoobiedood
Love the P/J configuration!
If I were going to list my least favorite combo it would be humbucker in bridge with a jazz in the middle.
A la....
d3yma0eymynbtk0b0wmpxhxpzc.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: retslock and Axstar
I’m starting to learn that I generally like basses with relatively simple controls and classic pickup settings. (ie: my Fender Jazz and Fender Precision).
I owned a PJ bass for awhile, but I was always just setting it to the isolated P pup, and using it as just a secondary P Bass. It sounded way to harsh with both pickups on.

I had a 2000 or 2001 Fender hot rod PJ for a few years. I tried but ultimately I did not like both pickups blended together. There was something in the upper mids that I found obnoxious. I suspect that might be what you are referring to as harsh. Maybe.

As mentioned already, there are so many different configs that PJs can have a wide variety of sounds. I did not like the sound of the one I had but I'm not going to dismiss others in the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BillMason
Yes, I am not even considering the Squier or Fendor. If I ever get the patience to wait for the build time, I might actually reach out to Birdsong to see if they have any interest in a custom build that would be P/J. I don't think I've ever seen them do that.

I like my CIJ Mustang well enough, but when I decided to get something special, I ordered a Maruszczyk SS Jake (P style body) with the P/MM config. Maruszczyk does several body styles in SS with a bunch of options at a reasonable price.

Invalid Link Removed
 
My first REAL bass was a Frankenstein Precision with a J on the bridge, and a P style baseball bat neck. I enjoyed it, but I didn't know enough back then anyway. I just ordered an Ibanez Talman 310 with a similar configuration. Hope it sticks. :yawn:

That being said, good for you for speaking out. I assumed after I read the title that you'd get some backlash, but I was pleasantly surprised by the mostly neutral feedback. Good job TB'ers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mbelue
I’m starting to learn that I generally like basses with relatively simple controls and classic pickup settings. (ie: my Fender Jazz and Fender Precision).
I owned a PJ bass for awhile, but I was always just setting it to the isolated P pup, and using it as just a secondary P Bass. It sounded way to harsh with both pickups on.

I guess you just don't like that particular PJ... or something about that PJ's set up, perhaps.

I didn't like the sound of Schecter Model T much at first (active PJ EMG pickups with 2-band EQ - it felt great and has one of the nicest necks ever... but it sounded a little harsh to me on the mids)... then I found adjusting the pickup heights I got a much better sound... and when I dumped the Ernie Ball strings it had originally and put a set of DR Sunbeams on, it became a favourite and still is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EdBo
I had a Tony Franklin Fretless. Great bass overall, but the J pickup introduced some single coil hum (some when both pickups were on, a lot when soloed). I think I would have liked it better if the J was hum cancelling. Still, there was good overall balance between the pickups, which is also a tricky thing to achieve. I guess I'd be fine with a P/J as long as both pickups are pretty even in output and don't hum, but these are elusive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fretlessguy
I went with a PJ Aerodyne primarily for comfort reasons and don't use the J much for originals but for covers it gets a close enough version of that awful 311 bass sound if you turn up the J and turn the P down a bit.

And for the originals I can do this weird thing where I just ignore the J volume knob after I turn it down.
 
I am borderline indifferent to PJs if we're talking about a Fender Precision that has a Jazz pickup added.
However, if we're talking about other basses that happen to have that pickup combination -- e.g., a Pedulla MVP/Buzz, or a Spector NS-2 -- then I love PJs!
 

Latest posts