• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Does 'Avatar' perpetuate stereotypes?

Is there some racism involved, even if unintentional?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34805869/ns/entertainment-movies/

We had a previous thread discussing the idea, but it was deleted. Then this story pops up on MSNBC front page today--so it certainly seems worth discussing, imo.

I haven't seen the movie, but I recall from the opinion piece I read in the previous thread that the plot seems similar to other films in which a white man helps to save a group of non-white people from danger, harm, or destruction.

Hopefully things can remain civil. I can't really comment myself without having seen the film, and honestly, it doesn't appeal to me in the slightest, so I probably won't see it.
 
Or maybe it was deleted for a reason the past two times it's been posted. Topical or not, the conversation will only stir up trouble.

it's unfortunate that people can't discuss the matter with maturity...i was looking forward to reading through one of the previous threads one evening (i only saw and posted in one), and was disappointed it had been deleted

i don't see any harm in discussing different viewpoints, that's historically how progress happens
 
Invalid Link Removed

Corps official: Avatar ‘sophomoric’

Staff report
Posted : Friday Jan 8, 2010 14:03:42 EST

Avatar, the highly anticipated 3-D movie by director James Cameron, was met with enthusiasm by audiences across the globe and has grossed more than $1 billion worldwide as of Jan. 6. Talks of a sequel are already underway.

But despite commercial success, Avatar has been the target of anger and backlash from some who see it as an affront to the Marine Corps and a negative allegory for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In the movie, a paraplegic Marine veteran named Jake agrees to travel to the distant, resource-rich planet Pandora where he works with the military and private mercenaries to displace a humanoid race called the Na’vi so that their land can be mined for precious minerals. In return for his service, Jake is to receive a surgery that will allow him to walk again, but after infiltrating the Na-vi with an avatar identity, he falls in love with one of the locals and decides to take a stand against the money-hungry corporation that seeks to eradicate them.

Chief among critics of the movie is the Marine Corps’ own director of public affairs, Col. Bryan Salas. In a recent letter to the Marine Corps Times (see below) he said the film, “takes sophomoric shots at our military culture.”

———

Have you seen Avatar? Do you think it portrays the Marine Corps or military at large in a negative light?

Speak your mind on our message board

Col. Bryan Salas’ letter:

Lost amid the staggering commercial success of “Avatar” and obscured by the punditry of the left and right as they debate James Cameron’s social and historical commentary are the real warriors whose heroism, valor and selfless service has allowed the U.S. to leave a war in Iraq that many in 2006 thought was unwinnable and indeed salvage success from the jaws of calamity.

“Avatar” takes sophomoric shots at our military culture and uses the lore of the Marine Corps and over-the-top stereotyping of Marine warriors to set the context for the screenplay. This does a disservice to our Corps of Marines and the publics’ understanding of their Corps.

The Marine Corps embraces a warrior-scholar mentality and prides itself on understanding host country narratives and sensitivities in complex climes and places. Gen. James Mattis, whose catch-phrase is “no better friend, no worse enemy,” better captures the essence of Marines who helped usher in the Sunni Awakening in Anbar province than the cinemagraphically convenient colonel-turned-mercenary antagonist in “Avatar.”

Let’s view “Avatar” for what it is, a leap in the wizardry of cinema, a digital fantasy and a vehicle for a film-maker to make a statement, but not emblematic of the Marines who honorably fight and fall to win our nation’s real battles today.

Col. Bryan Salas director of public affairs

Headquarters Marine Corps
 
yes, orginality seems lost in many recent hollywood endeavors, i agree

i like to try to understand these kinds of issues relating to worldviews from different perspectives...i understand that others find it petty or inflammatory to discuss these things, but that's not how i see it...

i think an orginal take of the simple inverse of the setting would go a long way, ie a non-white person (maybe a woman?) swooping in to save a white culture with her wisdom
 
this is an interesting observation--thanks for posting

That's not interesting, that's PR at work, trying to maintain the "heroic" image of the armed forces. Wouldn't have many recruits if they portrayed themselves as nothing more than the big stick of our foreign policy, after all.


Soldiers can be heroes. So can teachers, so can doctors, so can janitors. There is nothing implicit in an occupation that infers that status.
 
Stereotypes are always common in story-telling.

I also hear people complaining that Avatar is not original and borrows from many other stories.

Well, what story does not? What story is truly original?

The same people who would trash Avatar for being not original Sci Fi will say great things about Gattaca, while the latter borrows from a bunch of myth and stories and clearly identifies them.

Great movies with biblical, shakespearian, historical references abound.

As for stereotypes, it's always more obvious when it's your community that's targeted. Being French, I can tell you that Hollywood can be somewhat heavy handed sometimes.
 
I haven't seen this film and probably won't. I also watch so little TV these days that I hadn't even seen a commercial for it. The first time I'd even heard of it was in a thread here in TB OT and from the title I thought maybe it was about TB user avatars.

All that being said I will state that yes, this movie is hella racist.
 
As for stereotypes, it's always more obvious when it's your community that's targeted. Being French, I can tell you that Hollywood can be somewhat heavy handed sometimes.

this might be the most compelling aspect of the situation to me, personally...learning to recognize it when it's not my particular 'community' is an important part of life, imo

the story in the link i posted contains a poll in which people can vote--the numbers were far in favor of 'no racism' when i last checked it...i wonder how the final percentages will compare to demographics