I'm looking at a bass (best offer), and the pics look beautiful, until... I lost interest. I figure if the Luthier can't line up string holes in a straight line, who knows what else lurks under the facade. Plus it triggers my OCD. Next! Or am I being hypercritical?
No reason why anyone would deliberately do that - functionally it wouldn't make a difference but aesthetically...
Looks too big to be sloppiness, maybe the string through holes in the bridge are also unaligned? Perhaps there's a reason, you could ask.
No reason to ask: my OCD won't let me own a bass like that. I can't own a bass where the string bends to the side at the nut to reach the pegs, either.
That might be intentional. It might be done to mimic some string through guitars. (See pic in link) Google Image Result for http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c1/Bridge_string_thru_body.jpg/800px-Bridge_string_thru_body.jpg
That I could live with, it has order. The holes on the OP, which may or may not serve a purpose, look higgedly piggedly.
Depends on the price of the bass. For under $200 or so, I'm possibly willing to tolerate such things...
if it otherwise checks out, I'll go with IT ADDS CHARACTER, and easy to ID in case of some need to ID
As long as the length of the string from nut to saddle witness point remain unchanged, I don't think it'll be a problem (except for tapered strings?). But don't quote me on this.
I don't understand this. It's not any harder to make things line up even by hand. For those that make things without jigs and fixtures or automated equipment, locating a hole this far off is like telling the buyer FU. What brand? It would make sense if all the ones made on a single shift were like this.
It doesn't bother me but not much does. I can see why it would bother some. Is this someone's DIY or did the factory do that?