• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Does this exist?

Yes, less clutter and clean workflow is a good thing. I'm with you. I would love to have one of those boxes. The Mesa, too.
Shiftline Olympic also has a loop and a direct out, but it’s 1/4inch to go to a second di box.

But you’ve got the benefit of an aux in and headphone amp which I currently use a Darkglass Element as a live IEM mixer.

One day I’ll have the perfect solution on a PT Nano sized board 😅
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrensBand
From what I understand "good" DIs have large transformer made of high quality materials. This allows the direct signal to be distortion free and have a frequency that extends very low - important for bass.

Nothing wrong with the JHS punchline. Not at all. I would like to have one. But it is a different thing than a dedicated DI. For recording purposes I would want to blend the clean DI signal and the signal coming out of the Punchline. Some people use the clean DI for , say, 200 hz and below and the preamp / amp signal for grit up top.

I also have a punchline and it’s about as perfect as you can get in a studio chain in a pedal. But given the opening requirement, you need to run a clean DI before it and it has no effects loop between any part of it’s chain.

That’s one of the reasons that I got the capo, so I could easily patch additional fx in when needed. If I know I don’t need it I take a Tuner, Boost (just because it’s my favourite tone in a box pedal) and the Punchline and want for nothing else.

Even the element I mention above, when I’m using that I have an IR of my favourite punchline settings so it’s mimicking that sound.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrensBand
All digital amp sims are basically "software solutions". The difference being that the software isn't in your computer, but in a separate box (which means the correct term would strictly speaking be "firmware" rather than "software" I guess, but still....). My point is, a standalone digital amp sim isn't any better per se than a software/plugin amp sim.

Physical knobs on a standalone box/pedal might be more convenient/fun, but that's really the main difference between a software/plugin amp sim and a digital pedal amp sim. Well, for recording anyway. For gigging you would obviously need a standalone pedal/preamp amp sim.

If you specifically want analog amp sims... that narrows down your choices significantly.

I recently realized that it’s basically the same argument as console gamers vs PC.
 
Shiftline Olympic also has a loop and a direct out, but it's 1/4inch to go to a second di box.

But you've got the benefit of an aux in and headphone amp which I currently use a Darkglass Element as a live IEM mixer.

One day I'll have the perfect solution on a PT Nano sized board 😅
Hadn't heard of the Shiftline Olympic. Looks really interesting. Doesn’t seem to be too many of those floating around for sale.
 
Last edited:
What if the Bassrig had a clean balanced line out? Then you could blend your perfectly clean DI with the Bassrig analog amp sim in the box however you wanted. And what if the clean and amp sim line out were in phase and time aligned coming out of the pedal straight into the DAW. I don't know if that's possible, but that's what I'd like.
I would still rather have an external, high-end DI box for the clean signal, for the reasons I explained above. Another reason is that I wouldn't want a DI box to be "bass only". A separate DI box can be used for other instruments in my studio too.

Amp sims will only ever be an emergency backup solution for me though. Unless the situation prevents it I always prefer using real tube amps. And no, I don't want my amps to have a balanced output either, and when they do I generally don't use them. I much prefer using an external DI box.
I recently realized that it's basically the same argument as console gamers vs PC.

Sort of, yes. And just like with the console vs PC comparison, the specs of the PC will definitely matter.

The key word here is latency.

If you're using a plugin amp sim and monitor your playing through the DAW/amp sim (rather than direct monitoring your dry signal and adding the amp sim later) there WILL be latency. If you have a reasonably powerful PC/Mac it shouldn't be a problem, but you don't need much latency before it affects the "feel" of you playing.

The lowest latency your system can handle will of course also be affected by how many plugins you are running. If you record the bass early in the process, with few or no plugins involved, you can get away with much lower latency settings that if you record onto a nearly finished mix with tons of tracks with lots of plugins/soft synths.

The quality of the audio interface will also matter. A couple of years ago I got one of those dirt cheap Behringer U-Phoria interfaces for my home studio. I thought it would be sufficient for mixing/editing and doing overdubs on stuff I had recorded at my proper studio. It wasn't. With a "work-in-progress", that already had a large number of tracks/plugins, the Behringer interface couldn't deliver the low latency I needed to be able to do overdubs with soft synths. I replace the Behringer with an RME interface (using the same laptop). Problem solved. You get what you pay for I guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: meisi
Hadn't heard of the Shiftline Olympic. Looks really interesting. Doesn’t seem to be too many of those floating around for sale.
theres a few floating in the classified right now.

not sure if its exactly what you are looking for though but it does have thru out, master out and di out. iirc the master out doesn't have cab emulation but the aux + di does. so its great for live use.

definitely recommend it. its quite colourless compared to other tube preamps that I've heard. also noting that stock IR is quite average but the HD ir pack is quite cheap.