TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
A great discussion!!! However...
I used to be a professional photographer and there are many similarities between these two universes.
Amateur photographers (those who enjoy the trade w/o getting paid on a consistent basis) would come up and ask me what camera I was using, what lens I was using, what flash I had in my bag. Generally, I'd use a fixed lens and amateurs would ask me about the zoom lenses I had or the pixel count. I used flashes outdoors (which struck some as odd), I'd have a bag of batteries rather than a bag of lenses, I didn't have the latest model camera body.
Professionals (those who supported themselves with the trade) would ask where I was when I took photos, what it felt like. When talking gear, professionals usually only asked what kind of tripod I preferred (if I captured something on a monopod or a tripod, etc.). Professionals knew that the magic happened in the eyepiece, not in the equipment, and that a 50mm lens could create masterpieces in the right hands.
I liken the same to bass "playing". I don't think everyone is a bass "player". Perhaps there are different roles in the bass community: collectors, spenders, traders, amateurs, and professionals (likely even crossovers or ones I've not considered or mentioned). Many people enjoy collecting bass stuff - and that's good! Collectors may not play something as much as an amateur or professional, but owning it is part of the magic. (I imagine the cars in Jay Leno's garage, the ones with less than 1000 miles on them). Spenders turn things around fast, finding the newest and best iteration as necessary to their setup. Both of these roles are great for amateurs and professionals! Collectors with big bucks help keep the industry solvent and provide reason for manufacturers to create really exciting things. Spenders reward innovation! And amateurs and professionals reap the benefits by seeing botique pickups at a reasonable price and knockoffs that allow for 75-90% of the benefit of the real thing.
But beyond a certain point, the sound comes from the player, not the equipment. Give a $100 bass to a professional, let her/him rock it, and others will want that $100 bass. I have a friend who brags about his 8x10 cab all day long, explaining how heavy each magnet (in ounces) and how it'll shake the panties off of his next prey. But in reality, he doesn't play the bass that much, in fact he picks up my bass plugged into a 1x12 and has very little to say as he enjoys it. He is a collector. And being a collector makes him happy. He has something to talk about with his bass buddies, can use the first 5 frets, and waxes poetic about how deep he can sink his B string into this or that.
He and I are different. I practice an hour a day. I practice reading charts, tabs, notes, classical, country, hymns, contemporary, ear playing, boring riffs, hand strength and stamina exercises, finger twisters, reducing buzz, cleaning up my technique, and enjoy drinking 5 beers with a buddy and working over his ABG with round-wounds on his porch while he plays guitar and makes up lyrics. Its the doing, the playing, the mastry of a difficult skill that drives me.
However --> I'm happy that there are spenders, collectors, and players in the bass community. Without all of these roles, we wouldn't have a 1x12 that'll fill a 300 person theater. We would't know about the minute benefits and drawbacks of bolt-on vs neck-thru. I wouldn't have heard about cobalt flats or nickel half-rounds. Or how dead spots move around and can be shifted by a bit of weight on the neck. It takes spenders to sift through the hundreds of bass strings available. It takes collectors willing to look at a wall of +$5000 instruments. It takes amateurs who want to learn. It takes professionals who make me dream.
I will always only own one bass. If I can't do it on that bass, likely it isn't the bass that's the problem. I like the work, the effort, the mastry. But as Newton noted: "If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants." The professionals, amateurs, collectors and spenders have gotten us this far, and we need all of us to keep it going.
Kevin
P.S. to answer the OP - I've not downgraded in search of "better" or "more," I've adapted my playing style to find the sound I need.
I even had our floors done with wenge and bulbinga because I had a major thing for warwicks back in the days
I know a guy who has $65K and $80K DBs and he gigs with them all the time. I didn't ask him how much he spent on his bow, but I have played a $15K bow and it was sweet.
After playing a number of basses over the last few years, i recently decided I am sticking with stuff Leo had a hand in designing, Fender, Musician or G&L. That's pretty much what I'm going with. I no longer feel the need for anything real hi buck.
But that's me!
Not in the context of the thread. The thread is not whether low end or high end basses sound better or worse.
It's really tough to go wrong with a Yamaha. They make great instruments.I went through a Zon, Modulus, & Pedulla phase - very beautiful basses, but never felt comfortable on any of them.
Ended up with a relatively inexpensive Yamaha TRB1005 and have over 500 gigs on it so far.
Just pulled the trigger on a newer USA Fender P - looking forward to putting some serious miles on this one as well.
I bought a new Ken Smith 2016 elite 5 string this year, and it was very,very nice...But I just couldn't get used to the tapered strings & wasn't totally happy with how it sat in the house mix. However, I ended up trading a few basses & eventually settled on my Bossa ob-5. The Bossa was used & several thousand dollars cheaper than the Smith, but the Bossa feels, plays, & even sounds better than the Smith (to me) (& I'm not knocking Smith at all, they are amazing in many aspects)... so I can totally see where you are coming from. More $ for a bass doesn't always equate to being "better"
Congrats on finding what u like!
What about the sheer joy I feel playing and hearing the instruments of my choosing, whether in a live mix or in a recorded one? I don't see that in your equation anywhere. And yes, to me that is REAL value.
It would probably be hard to totally get rid of the joy part, even if you are pursuing music for income, but I get your meaning. I guess when you turn anything into a job, there is certainly a risk that the joy will get sucked out of it.Oh I agree, which is why my gear has not paid for itself.
If I were seriously pursuing music as a source of income, my approach would be different.
Its not insane at all. It's tough for me to justify paying 6k for a bass, even as a session player. Let's add to the fact that artists endorsing these instruments rarely pay that price either. They can't afford too honestly. Most of the guys buying super expensive basses at cost are hobbyists with big budgets.
My AVRI is close to as well made as my more boutique Jazz. More importantly, it has the tone I want.
In my 30 year pursuit for the perfect bass I went all the way up to the point of buying a 60's Fender and a brand new custom Fodera.
I am done with my pursuit, you can't hunt for something that is just not there.
There is just no such a thing as the perfect bass. There is always something wrong with each and every single one of them.
I could not stand the Fodera and the 60's Fender for being not perfect (for me I should add), and I sold them, they had to go.
Currently happy with my '79 Sabre, '85 BB1000S and 2016 EuroLX.
Long story short, no, it is not insanity. It is asymmetric or nonlinear customer satisfaction. Think of the following two options:
Which of the two emotions that the above described situations brought up feels "stronger" or "bigger" to you?
- you find a bill of $100 on the parking lot, or
- you lose a $100 bill you had on your pocket
So, as the monetary values are the same in both instances, should not the emotion feel about the same in "size" also? It does not, and hence what we now understand is that the sense of "value" has little to do with "price". One guy who likes watches can like his cheap divers Seiko as much - or more - than he does his megadollar Rolex.
The psychology of appreciation does not follow pricing.
I love my mid-level Ibanez basses. Sometimes I get an itch to try something newer and "better", and I've played much higher end basses in stores, but they just don't do it for me. Maybe they sound slightly better, but I like dirt, and any tiny detail would be lost from the dirt I use. And the tiny improvement I tone is not worth quadrupling the price of my bass! And those were only $2K, I couldn't justify some of the higher priced ones.