• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

DR "Fat Beams"

Fat Beams are my #1 String. I like them because they are very versatile. They can get thumpy and low, or they can cut through with the highs. Im a thumper too, and they just have a great thump sound thats not to high but crisp enough.

I'm not too crazy about the sound of the 5th string of my DR Fatbeams (.125). I ordered a .130 to see if that is better. The fifth string didn't have the tension/response/tone that my Sadowsky Nickel Blues had. But, I grew to dislike those a lot due to overall tone.
 
How do the Lo-Riders sound compared to Fat Beams?

I like the sound of the fatbeams but the tension isn't stiff enough...

they are pretty similar sounding in my experience, with the lo-riders having maybe a bit fuller upper midrange--close enough that the biggest difference i noticed when i switched was the stiffness...feel of the wrap is very similar as well

the nickel lo-riders, on the other hand, seem to have a stronger fundamental and a lower midrange emphasis (i've only compared these to fat beams on a fretless J) much smoother wrap feel compared to ss, as would be expected
 
I just switched back to MM45 Fats from TI Jazz Flats. I hate to say this, but the Jazz Flats just didn't cut the Fats, and I gave them a good six months to steal my heart away. The first time I played with the DRs after a long hiatus, I thought aha, my bass and my hands are back.

My Fat Beams have about six months of oh, 10-15 hours a week of challenging play on them. How long has everyone else found them to last? I was surprised to hear Dhomer say they didn't last him six months, but I'm playing blues and jazz with fingers. I can see where picking metal could thrash the strings a lot sooner.

Thanks in advance for your replies.

Jeff
 
  • Like
Reactions: trothwell