• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass duh... 3-string restoration photos

I knew that issue would come up. I'm having lunch with him next week and will report back in. I think he had some issues with the neck itself being warped (maybe not the right word), so I'll fill everyone in after we meet. Thanks

Louis

AFTER MEETING WITH NICK: That seems to have been "my bad"on the neck blocks - they were just "holders" while he worked on the top bouts (lining cracks, getting them more or less even etc). He plans to do a traditional block (curved/counter to the now even - more or less - curve of the shoulders) and then set the (straightened) neck (which seems to be made out of oak of all things) into it in the usual manner.

Sorry for the confusion. Shoot the messenger.

Also we figured (roughly) that the bass dates probably from @ 1830 (originally a three stringer) and that the wood for the sides and top would have been from @ the turn of the century (probably not much older; maybe a decade younger). Still, it's looking to be a 180 year new bass when we're done. Nick rejected one piece of wood for the back and will probably pick up a piece at the NAMM show in January.

We even, optimistically, started to talk about varnishes!

Louis
 
The project got put on hold while I went off to be a college president for a year. Now we're "back" at it... No pun intended (well, maybe a little)

Louis
 

Attachments

  • Back begins.JPG
    Back begins.JPG
    46.6 KB · Views: 265
  • back continues.jpg
    back continues.jpg
    49.5 KB · Views: 333
I can't complain. Nick's done it between making violins for serious money. I have a couple of very good basses, and this was totally a part-time project... which probably would have cost me two or three times more if we had done it "on the clock".

Louis