KingOfAmps said:What exactly do the specs need to say for the cab to sound good?
Well for some people all the specs need to say is a brand name and a high price tag to sound good.

TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
KingOfAmps said:What exactly do the specs need to say for the cab to sound good?

KingOfAmps said:What exactly do the specs need to say for the cab to sound good?
jpark said:I know, that's why it is hard for me to justify this. But like others have said, looking at the specs it doesn't seem like it. I found a used avatar from a fellow tb'er. I may buy it and see how it sounds. If i like it may order another cab.
Masher88 said:Boy, I guess I'm the only person who really was disappointed in the Avatar cabs. I bought a 2x10 Delta and a 4x10 Delta Avatar (both 4 ohm) to take off some of the strain of lifting an Ampeg 8x10. I used that setup 2 times at gigs and now it sits in the garage. It was very weak sounding with no bottom end. They also have a very low sensitivity which made them not use all the power I have availabe. At the time I had a Mesa 400+ as amplification (it can handle the 2 ohm load of the 2 Avatars together). I replaced the Avatars with a Schroeder 310212. What a difference!!!! I'm not trying to bash the Avatars because they are a very good "bang for the buck". They are constructed very well. They are great entry level cabs. But getting rid of your Ampegs? That's crazy talk! Just my opinion, though.
Fretless5verfan said:you might want to check out the new PS series from Epifani, they're not super light, but they're definately not as heavy as ampeg stuff, plus they're not crazy expensive like the UL series.
Exactly the reason I began searching for replacements. The BXT cabs were already a step down in weight from the PR410HLF I had before, but they're still a little heavy. The Avatars provide nice tone, at a nice price, and I can carry the 2x10 in one hand. The 2x12, I probably could to, but it would be a little awkward.JordanDrinksTea said:personally i would go for the avatars (neo) I'm pretty sure i'd give up my ampegs so i don't get 3346347 years of back problems.
jpark said:I checked their website and didn't see anything on them. You have anymore info on them?
Masher88 said:Boy, I guess I'm the only person who really was disappointed in the Avatar cabs...I replaced the Avatars with a Schroeder 310212. What a difference!!!!
I was hoping YOU would see this thread!teedub said:I hate to disagree with the Bassman, but I just finished doing what you are thinking of doing, and I regret NOTHING. Other than the fact that I can't seem to move my old cabs......(see my sig).
I've lightened up my entire rig, and I couldn't be happier. The tone is still awesome, and I can lift everything in 2 trips or less rather than 4. I take the 2x10 to rehearsals and super small gigs, the 2x12 to smallish gigs, and both whenever possible. I honestly don't think you can go wrong with that setup. A 4x10 would SMOKE, but the 2x10+2x12 is all I'd ever need now.
Avatar cabs are FAR from "econo cabs". Inexpensive doesn't necessarily mean "cheap". BUT, if you can, TRY BEFORE YOU BUY. What's great for me, may not work for you.
LOL!jeff_bass28 said:I was hoping YOU would see this thread!![]()

Bond...James Bond.teedub said:LOL!You bet! I couldn't wait to see who was going to put this all together and bust me! LOL! You are Columbo.
And FTR, I CAN carry the 212 with one hand. These cabs are perfect for me. Barely break a sweat moving my gear around now.
