Yuck! I just watched that video and I want that 1:10 of my life back. HC has a much better video online shot from the Warwick booth at Summer NAMM last year, also gloriously devoid of "rockstar" poses.
Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
eBay genius!
- Thread starter eedre
- Start date
Oh it growls all right.
Nice thing is that it's swamp ash with a poplar top and a maple neck with ebony fingerboard - no neck dive to speak of and mine's well under 8 pounds.Its nice to see they have the bass player from Korn showing off how good a Warwick sounds 
Also for those questioning the actual playing: 1.) Why would you overdub yourself playing something so awful? 2.) Videos on the internet dont always sync up with the audio, these things happen. 3.) My ears were flooded with blood after a good 5 seconds so I couldn't really tell if they were in sync or not
Also for those questioning the actual playing: 1.) Why would you overdub yourself playing something so awful? 2.) Videos on the internet dont always sync up with the audio, these things happen. 3.) My ears were flooded with blood after a good 5 seconds so I couldn't really tell if they were in sync or not
I just got a response back from the guy that listed it:
Cool, I hope you like it. I've sold 4, this was the last one at the warehouse, I don't know how they get out of order. Thanks. Mike
Apparently he totally missed the point, so I sent this response:
I was actually pointed to your listing via an online bass players' forum - you had the bass listed as #251 out of 250 - it's actually #251 out of 299. Hope this helps.
Cool, I hope you like it. I've sold 4, this was the last one at the warehouse, I don't know how they get out of order. Thanks. Mike
Apparently he totally missed the point, so I sent this response:
I was actually pointed to your listing via an online bass players' forum - you had the bass listed as #251 out of 250 - it's actually #251 out of 299. Hope this helps.
Nooooo....
1, 2, 3, 4, 5
How many numbers did I just list? Five. If they made 250 basses and started out at 1, the last one would be #250.
eedre said:
Hehe, yeah, but what moron would start counting at 0? "Hey, I just got my first car, now I have zero cars."
Nooooo....
1, 2, 3, 4, 5
How many numbers did I just list? Five. If they made 250 basses and started out at 1, the last one would be #250.
Hehe, yeah, but what moron would start counting at 0? "Hey, I just got my first car, now I have zero cars."
LAWL!!!!!
What a stroke. ROFLMAONooooo....
1, 2, 3, 4, 5
How many numbers did I just list? Five. If they made 250 basses and started out at 1, the last one would be #250.
Hehe, yeah, but what moron would start counting at 0? "Hey, I just got my first car, now I have zero cars."
That made my night!
maybe warwick started their serial numbers at 0001?
i mean, 0251-0001=250
that would make that warwick the final bass in the run...
just giving him the benifit of the doubt
Ummm.....if you're being funny....good one! If not.....check your math.
Why would you SUBTRACT #1??
OK, I guess maybe I bit.
Maybe if the first one was numbered 0. Then the last one would be 250 - BUT technically it's the 251st one made.
NO!!! Because 0 could not have been made! If it had been, then the run would have been for 251 instead.
Now, now....
There's pics, so it must exist!
I wonder though, it is #251...like Spinal TAps amps go to 11. So when everyone else does a limited edition, they only go to 250.
But not the folks at warwick, theres is better they go to 251....
so why not make 249 the most limit quantity and then make 250 one better?
so why not make 249 the most limit quantity and then make 250 one better?
<hmmmm> This one goes to 251! <sheesh>
Nooooo....
1, 2, 3, 4, 5
How many numbers did I just list? Five. If they made 250 basses and started out at 1, the last one would be #250.
Hehe, yeah, but what moron would start counting at 0? "Hey, I just got my first car, now I have zero cars."
Actually, we start counting at 0 fairly often when designing digital systems
But you're right, it w.ould be silly to start from 0 with a product
Maybe if the first one was numbered 0. Then the last one would be 250 - BUT technically it's the 251st one made.
Oh yea.
woops.
Maybe they start at 2. *shrug*
this would actually work
but at the same time completly pointless
