Like I said - and please believe I'm not being patronising here - I think that will change.![]()
You're probably right
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Like I said - and please believe I'm not being patronising here - I think that will change.![]()
Yeah, and a judge IMHO should be impartial and represent the law. If you represent the law, you dont give personal opinions period. That's what it means to be impartial.
My assumptions do not apply to everyone, fair enough. They apply to me, I'm giving a bit too much credit to people there![]()
IMHO, it is. Judges, as representatives of the law in the courtroom, should never give their personal opinion like that, ESPECIALLY when its on national TV.
So you're saying they should read the whole thing before responding, eh?It's her own fault, if it says photo only, that's what you're gonna get!
Peoples stupidity and the fact that they don't pay attention, should not be taken out on the seller.
I remember a lot of people were selling "link to an x-box for $40" and getting £200+ for them. Not the sellers fault.
Probably.Is that really her myspace page?
It doesn't appear that she's logged in since 2005 though.
- Dave
So you're saying they should read the whole thing before responding, eh?![]()

Quite the publicity stunt wasn't it?
So, er.... have you read the whole of this thing in which you're on record as saying people are stupid if they don't read the whole thing?Thanks Dr. Watson.
Yeah thats exactly my thought actually![]()
So, er.... have you read the whole of this thing in which you're on record as saying people are stupid if they don't read the whole thing?![]()