• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

EBMM Music Man Basses...why so much $?

What I found "rediculous" was that a used Stingray from the 1990s is selling for more than what I spent for the exact same bass when it was new. I agree that, considering economics and time passage, that the same new bass is going to cost more today...I did say I wouldn't pay it, but that's just me. I repeat, if they can get people to pay it, more power to them. I won't. But that's not my point. My major complaint is in the price of the used bass. What I don't understand is how a 20 year old Music Man still fetches more than what I paid new in 1993. What is so "rediculous" about that?

It's inflation coupled with a product known to retain its value better than much of the competition. Simple economics.
 
Read his comments, they are sarcastic and rude and it sounds to me like he has his forum muscles on. I love that people think they can say things in a forum they would never say to your face and not get called out on it. That I find inappropriate. Or maybe I'm just in a bad mood today. Perhaps I'm a little thin skinned, but I would never tell someone their question is stupid. That is exactly questioning their intelligence. It was a jerky thing to say, that is my opinion. If he thinks my question is stupid then he should keep it to himself. Saying the thread is stupid is what a 10 year old would do.
 
The bottom line is that a used Stingray (or any other bass, or item) is worth whatever someone is willing to pay. If you're unwilling to afford that, then that's your problem - not the seller's, and not the rest of those who can afford it and thus set the price.

And besides, from the seller's point of view, why wouldn't you want the value of your item to increase over time?
 
Read his comments, they are sarcastic and rude and it sounds to me like he has his forum muscles on. I love that people think they can say things in a forum they would never say to your face and not get called out on it. That I find inappropriate. Or maybe I'm just in a bad mood today. Perhaps I'm a little thin skinned, but I would never tell someone their question is stupid. That is exactly questioning their intelligence. It was a jerky thing to say, that is my opinion. If he thinks my question is stupid then he should keep it to himself. Saying the thread is stupid is what a 10 year old would do.

Well Mike I have to agree with you that there was no need for George to post saying "this thread is stupid" as that post did not, IMO, add any value to the discussion, and certainly was not a very friendly thing to say.

Of course, as we know, two wrongs don't make a right, and replying with "you're a jerk" is also a 10-year old form of response. It would have been better, IMO, to either 1) ignore his post, or 2) respond by saying "thank you for your opinion".

Okay, now back to the subject of this thread. And btw, IMO, this thread has value. It is allowing a good discussion of bass values and pricing.
 
......l
Last question. If 20+ year old Stingrays are going used for north of a grand, why wouldn't a buyer just spend the extra few hundred and buy a new one with a warranty? Go ahead, the righteous among you are free to cast your stones.

In 1979 I bought a 1979 Music Man Sabre. Cost around $700

In 1999 I sold that same MM Sabre for........$700

In 2009 I really really wished I still had that 1979 Sabre. Or even a new one, (except Ernie Ball was saying then that Sabre was gone, never to return) so I had to shop used. Used were going $1,800 - 2,100 then. Remember I paid $700 for new 30 years prior.

In 2010 I found a 1980 for @ $1,300 and a '79 for about $1,100. The '79 needed serious rehab. So my all in cost on that one was around $1,700.

In 2013 EBMM changed their tune and brought back the Sabre. GC prices for a new one are $1,750 - 1,950. Used pre-EBMM are still going in the $1,200 - 1,800 range (depending on condition). Availability of the new has had some affect on the pricing of the used, even though they are from different eras. Even so, the used price is waaaaay more than the new price was way back when. That's the inflation part of it. A $700 purchase in 1990 is the equivalent of $1,251 in 2013 dollars. And my $700 purchase in 1979 would be $2,252 today, so by that measure, today's price for a new Sabre is a bargain. And I effectively paid a lot less than new ($1,100 - 1,700 vs $2,200 in today's dollars) for my used ones.

Feel free to check....Invalid Link Removed

Peace,

James
 
i love this site for the gems of knowledge, but it is extremely passive-aggressive and...smug. a lot of you people own far too many bass guitars for your own good. :D

the other day i saw a tryst between two TB'ers where at least 15 posts were exchanged yet nobody moved an inch from their original position, both parties adopted the "i think this so i'm going to just keep posting it ever more pointedly" mindset...painfully polite yet so scathing in tone. and alas, once both men's egos were sufficiently re-padded, it was off to the next jousting match.
 
No hating or trolling, but I have to say that EBMM basses are way too overpriced.Yes I know it's my opion and that they are all ''boutique'' and such.. But seriously, they sound horrible and for what you get I wouldn't spend more than 1300 bucks for any kind of model. The Music Man Bongo is my favorite design but it sound terrible.. Plus the price waaaaay too high. - 50 % would be acceptable.
 
the other day i saw a tryst between two TB'ers where at least 15 posts were exchanged yet nobody moved an inch from their original position, both parties adopted the "i think this so i'm going to just keep posting it ever more pointedly" mindset...painfully polite yet so scathing in tone. and alas, once both men's egos were sufficiently re-padded, it was off to the next jousting match.

Human nature at its finest!

Sheesh, I sure hope so! We humans have certainly had enough practice over the millenia. It's one of the things we humans do best! Aren't we a wonderful species? :hmm:
 
But seriously, IMO they sound horrible

Fixed it for ya. ;)

Based on sales, there seems to be a plethora of folks who have an opinion quite different than yours as to how EBMMs sound. For example, the late Bob Birch in Elton's band. He could have chosen any bass on the planet, and he chose an EBMM. Same with the late Benjamin Orr of the Cars. There are plenty of others who prefer EBMM basses.

There is no right or wrong. It's all a matter of personal preference.
 
Ahh, the trusted 'that does not mean what you think it means' joke at my expense. That was hilarious...back in 1987 when the Princess Bride did it.

But that being said, you're right. My bad.

It's a 'plain, new' Jazz bass for $2400. Didn't mean to imply that it was an old, used bass.

Oh. And by the way. NEVER get involved in a land war in Asia.

Maybe I can explain it so you can understand - there is nothing "plain" about a "Deluxe" or "Re-Issue" - either will typicaly command a higher price... If you really wanted to post a "plain old Jazz bass", you would've posted some sort of standard MIA - instead, you picked extreme examples to exagerrate whatever point it was you were trying to make...


- georgestrings
 
George, with all due respect, you're a jerk. As for the rest of this discussion, I thank you for your responses, snarky and rude though some of them may have been. I just wanted to see if anyone else thought the price of used Music Man basses was too high like I do. I guess I'm in the minority, but I'm still not going to shell out over $1000 for a used 20 + year old bass. Just one man's opinion.

Last question. If 20+ year old Stingrays are going used for north of a grand, why wouldn't a buyer just spend the extra few hundred and buy a new one with a warranty? Go ahead, the righteous among you are free to cast your stones.

Maybe so, but I understand a couple of simple concepts like inflation, and *some* things holding or even gaining in value - and apparantly, you don't understand such things...

It's really simple - if you think something is "over-priced", don't buy it... Lastly - I assure you that anything I type, I would also say to your face...


- georgestrings
 
Maybe I can explain it so you can understand - there is nothing "plain" about a "Deluxe" or "Re-Issue" - either will typicaly command a higher price... If you really wanted to post a "plain old Jazz bass", you would've posted some sort of standard MIA - instead, you picked extreme examples to exagerrate whatever point it was you were trying to make...


- georgestrings

He was trying to compare a Fender with a pre-amp to level the playing field. Really what does it matter.
 
I also have wondered why new EBMM basses cost so much. I've had a few of them over the years, both four and five string models, and I never paid more than $750 for one. Used ones used to be available for under $500. It's not like EBMM has done a bunch of R&D lately or changed their materials. I love a good sounding Stingray, but at $1,500 and over, it just doesn't seem appropriate. I wonder if the introduction of the SBMM line caused EBMM to raise their prices?

Like John I've been buying MM's since '07 and haven't seen any price increases. As for R&D they have bought out new models that are Active/Passive and Series/ Parallel in multiple pickup configurations. SBMM models have gone up a little since their introduction but they also released a
new Sub line for a lot less. I find there build quality and
consistency above their competition in both MM and SBMM.
 
No hating or trolling, but I have to say that EBMM basses are way too overpriced.Yes I know it's my opion and that they are all ''boutique'' and such.. But seriously, they sound horrible and for what you get I wouldn't spend more than 1300 bucks for any kind of model. The Music Man Bongo is my favorite design but it sound terrible.. Plus the price waaaaay too high. - 50 % would be acceptable.

Please don't take this wrong, I just saw the irony of this post in a thread about overpriced used basses.

"They (EBMM basses) sound horrible" "I wouldn't spend more that $1300 for any kind of model (again EBMM)"

Really, most all of us wouldn't spend a penny on a bass we thought sounded "horrible".

No offence or cut intended, just ironic. :)
 
Last question. If 20+ year old Stingrays are going used for north of a grand, why wouldn't a buyer just spend the extra few hundred and buy a new one with a warranty? Go ahead, the righteous among you are free to cast your stones.

If '63 Precisions are going for $12,000, why wouldn't a buyer just purchase a 2013 AVRI Precision for $1,999?



Seriously?? :rollno:













No hating or trolling, but I have to say that EBMM basses are way too overpriced.Yes I know it's my opion and that they are all ''boutique'' and such.. But seriously, they sound horrible and for what you get I wouldn't spend more than 1300 bucks for any kind of model. The Music Man Bongo is my favorite design but it sound terrible.. Plus the price waaaaay too high. - 50 % would be acceptable.

No offense, but no one cares what a 22 year old, who plays a starter bass kit, thinks an EBMM is worth. There are thousands of you guys out there buying Squiers and Gio's and Deans. More power to you. I'm sure it sounds great in mom's basement. Fact is, EBMM's are worth what the market decides. And considering they sell tons of gear, the current pricing seems just right.