• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

EBMM no longer makes "The StingRay"?

Viva la stingray

In early 2005, after having played a '78 jazz for 20 years - and being thoroughly sick of the sight of it - I decided it was time to buy a new bass, so I went to the best music store in my capital city and traded it in on a 'natural' 3 band H stingray with black pickguard, a la Bernard Edwards { one of my bona fide bass heroes }.

The 'ray was infinitely superior to the jazz in all aspects, and despite being ignorant of the difference between the three and two band at the time, I bought it and was king of the hill from then on { or so I thought }.

However, as time went by, I began to wonder why I could NEVER get mine to sound quite like the stingrays I'd heard on recordings - i.e. not as much low end; a more brittle-sounding and clanky top end, and so on. Then I found out. LOL.

Well, nearly twenty years later and I still think my 'ray is a great instrument, so much so that I'll never sell it { mostly for sentimental reasons } but it doesn't get much playing time these days as I've acquired much better basses since, and those get the gigs{ '82 BB2000, '84 BB3000 & CS '59 Precision }.

However, on the odd occasion that I do pull her out of the case to get my 'Bernard Edwards' on, I fall in love all over again - only to be quickly reminded why I don't play it much any more - and back in the case it goes.
 
Hahahahaha

No, no, I can't actually. That's a good one.

I apologize for criticizing slab body basses everyone. I stand corrected.

Everyone here can just add any belly and forarm cuts pretty quickly at home.

We all have the skills, tools, experience, and the ability to refinish those parts to match the areas we "cut".

Sorry for the sarcasm 58kites..... but you have to understand... the majority of people don't have the ability, skill, tools, and experience to do that.
It's really not that hard, or asking a friend who is handy with a grinder/sander, we all know a carpenter, yes?
The price for a pro to do a forearm cut is cheap in the world of what people regularly dish out for USA made StingRays.
No need to refinish, the raw wood is fine, or a rattle can of clear coat paint is also very cheap and very easy.
Rather than have a bass you love but won't use, fixing one so you can makes good sense.
No need to be sorry, believing it can be easily done is key.
Tele 01-01-16.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I suspect those of you who read my posts, know I am a huge Bernard Edwards fan. He deserves a signature bass for his memory. For Louis Johnson, Music Man could make a signature Stingray or Sabre.
I’ve said this here many times. Especially when they introduced the Joe Dart and Cliff Williams.

I think Louis Johnson , Bernard Edwards , Paul S Denman, Pino ( fret less ) and Flea should have all had signature models.
These players along with Tony Levin influenced many others to play MusicMan basses.
 
I have a love hate relationship with Stingrays. I especially love the way the 2 band Rays with flats sound when other people play them. Same thing for the Specials. I’ve owned both . I just stand them when I play them. That annoying metallic ping when slapped just bothers my ear. The Specials were more comfortable to play but still not quite warm enough for my ear. If it had the bridge mutes I might like it better.

I like the Sabre a little more. But The Caprice is where I finally found a MusicMan that I really like.
 
I’ve said this here many times. Especially when they introduced the Joe Dart and Cliff Williams.

I think Louis Johnson , Bernard Edwards , Paul S Denman, Pino ( fret less ) and Flea should have all had signature models.
These players along with Tony Levin influenced many others to play MusicMan basses.

+100
 
I love Ray's of all years. I like the Specials pretty well. Without a doubt they are a little different sounding. At some point I will get around to having the John East pre that I bought for mine installed. Im feeling like that could be the best of all possible worlds.
 
I don't split hairs too much with Rays......do old Rays sound different than newer Specials?.....well, yeah.......do they all sound like Stingrays? .....well, yeah.........

And just to be clear I have no interest in vintage purism. I like modern stuff and I like progress. The 2-band/alnico configuration was still being produced up until a year or so ago and that's all you need to get the Bernard sound. That and flats possibly. Nothing else really matters. You don't need pre-Ernie Ball or any other vintage feature. You could put a 2 band pre and alnico pickup in a Stingray Special and you'd have the Bernard sound. So it's not some vintage mysticism I'm peddling here, it's something very recent and clear cut.
 
It's really not that hard, or asking a friend who is handy with a grinder/sander, we all know a carpenter, yes?
The price for a pro to do a forearm cut is cheap in the world of what people regularly dish out for USA made StingRays.
No need to refinish, the raw wood is fine, or a rattle can of clear coat paint is also very cheap and very easy.
Rather than have a bass you love but won't use, fixing one so you can makes good sense.
No need to be sorry, believing it can be easily done is key.
View attachment 4307007
So you buy a $2000 bass, Heck, even a $1000 bass. You're going to start hacking it up if you discover you don't like the lack of body contours, and you know they make a version that has the body contours you want?

No, you sell it.
 
I suspect those of you who read my posts, know I am a huge Bernard Edwards fan. He deserves a signature bass for his memory. For Louis Johnson, Music Man could make a signature Stingray or Sabre.

Agreed. Bernard was in a lot of ways the pinnacle of the craft of electric bass playing. Perfect elegance, perfect use of space, perfect blend between pitch and rhythm, an absolute fulfillment of the role of a bass player in a way that could only be done on electric bass. And he had style. He was a paragon of awesomeness and should be held up as such.

It is regrettable that there's never been a signature model for him. I don't immediately blame EBMM for it though. It's not their fault that Bernard is not the kind of household name that's going to drive sales. And we don't know if they've tried to do a sig model and weren't able to work it out with his estate or something like that. The main thing is that we can hear that sound on his records and get it for ourselves. That's the real tribute. I don't always go for his sound when I'm playing. My basic style is very different from his, but there are parts in our songs where I do play something that's inspired by him and I have to use his plucking technique. Having a 2 band Ray which responds so perfectly to that type of playing is so fun, with the preamp almost sort of overdriving from being hit hard. It's a playing experience that I don't think you get from any other bass. And it's nice to carry that little subtle tribute to one of the true masters too.
 
Agreed. Bernard was in a lot of ways the pinnacle of the craft of electric bass playing. Perfect elegance, perfect use of space, perfect blend between pitch and rhythm, an absolute fulfillment of the role of a bass player in a way that could only be done on electric bass. And he had style. He was a paragon of awesomeness and should be held up as such.

It is regrettable that there's never been a signature model for him. I don't immediately blame EBMM for it though. It's not their fault that Bernard is not the kind of household name that's going to drive sales. And we don't know if they've tried to do a sig model and weren't able to work it out with his estate or something like that. The main thing is that we can hear that sound on his records and get it for ourselves. That's the real tribute. I don't always go for his sound when I'm playing. My basic style is very different from his, but there are parts in our songs where I do play something that's inspired by him and I have to use his plucking technique. Having a 2 band Ray which responds so perfectly to that type of playing is so fun, with the preamp almost sort of overdriving from being hit hard. It's a playing experience that I don't think you get from any other bass. And it's nice to carry that little subtle tribute to one of the true masters too.

Let the church say amen!:thumbsup:
 
I'm not sure if this is something that has flown under the radar or happened gradually so that we haven't quite noticed it as such. Obviously we all knew that the Stingray Special was different from the traditional one and there was plenty of discussion about that. But at the time it was released the StingRay Classic was still being produced. So if you wanted the "real" StingRay tone - the tone that probably got you into StingRays in the first place, as heard on records by The Brothers Johnson, Sister Sledge, Chic, Sade, etc - then there was a StingRay for you being produced. But it seems that's no longer the case and I find it kind of weird and sad that EBMM no longer makes "The StingRay Bass".

I'm looking at the Ray-type basses currently on their website and I see the StingRay Special, the Cliff Williams, the Joe Dart, the short scale, and the Mike Herrera. The Cliff Williams is a real StingRay for sure, but there were only 26 made lol. So that one's irrelevant. None of the others listed constitute a real StingRay spec by any stretch. The Special is a great, great bass. Better in a lot of ways objectively than a "real" StingRay. But quite different sounding and different looking. The shape is subtly different for the worse imo. The bridge lacks the reassuring studs to keep the saddles from moving. And it has a different pickup and preamp so it just isn't the same bass sound that you hear on classic StingRay records.

Now, my opinion when the StingRay Special was released was that it should have just been called the StingRay, and taken up that mantle. As much as I love the traditional StingRay and that's what I prefer, I know that it wasn't perfect, and that moreover companies need to change and grow and not stagnate. When a company makes a change I like it to be bold and confident, so rolling out the new Special spec as the StingRay would have been right up my alley. But the way they've gone about it they've ended up not making anything called the StingRay bass. Their ultimate flagship product that put them on the map, got them to where they are today, and is considered one of the big three electric basses of all time. Their main bass product has the qualifier of "Special". I just find that odd. In a sense it could all be solved by simply dropping the "Special" moniker. But then there's the fact that they don't make anything with the spec that allows you to get the classic StingRay sound. So if you love the Bernard Edwards sound you're going to have to look for something used, and really you'll need a 2 bander which they produced less and less of as the years went on. So that really magical tone from so many great records is at risk of becoming unobtainable.

In my opinion EBMM could do something similar to Gibson's Modern and Original collections. The StingRay Special would become the "StingRay Modern", and there would be a StingRay Original with the old style body shape, 21 frets instead of 22, studded bridge, 2 band preamp and Alnico pickup. The body contours, lighter weight tuning machines, and compensated nut could be common to both lines since they're basically objective improvements. But both would simply say "StingRay" on the headstock so that everyone feels they are getting the genuine article.

Idk, there's just something really special about the OG StingRay sound that I feel is being lost here. Anyone else feel this way?

OK ... I went to the musicians friend web site and they have over 50 different types of sting ray basses for sale ... that is about 49 more than I need
 

Latest posts