I don't have any issues with the pricing if the Bass itself has no QC issues. I own a Classic which is around the same price as a Special and a Bongo 5 which cost a couple of hundred pounds more than the Special, and I was happy with the price of both. Oh and please don't revert to name calling it is so infantile and does nothing to advance the debate in a sensible grown up discussion.
Just so I have a feeling of to whom I am talking, have you ever played a Special? Even touched one?
You sound as though you've never even held one. They are different from the regular EBMM Stingrays. I ordered one of those a couple of years ago and took it back the next day; too heavy, and frankly sounded rather like a bass with just a hot neck pickup and a hot preamp.
The 2017 Stingray Classic I had was nothing like the original Stingray I had in the 70's that was much better, pretty much all around.
The 2019 Special I now have is better than both the 70's Stingray and the 2017 Classic, by far and in all ways, particularly weight and sound. QC is better than most basses in this price class.
You seem stuck on QC for the money, so I'll say that the QC on my Special is better than any production bass I've ever owned. Better actually than some custom boutique basses I've had (see above concerning fret sprouts on one of them).
The thing about fully custom basses is that, because it's a one-off for the luthier, you have to accept some weirdness because it's rather like a prototype. Not so with a production bass. The Special is fine in this regard. It is a well-developed and thought-out evolution of the Stingray, true to the Stingray moniker, with nothing weird about it. But it
is different from prior Stingrays.
Look, no one here is trying to talk you into one. We're all happy as clams with our Specials. You seem to think there's a problem with the quality/price ratio. Fine. Don't buy one. Don't even look at one. Fair enough?