As do yours. Thanks for the repliesThat is the difference between a hobbyist and a professional. As I stated before your comments make statements about your professionalism.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
As do yours. Thanks for the repliesThat is the difference between a hobbyist and a professional. As I stated before your comments make statements about your professionalism.
Don't forget bands like tool, my bloody valentine, dinosaur jr, bardo pond, minus the bear, mars volta or mogwai if we're talking big big boards and making it work beautifully.
Then again, sometimes i find myself rehearsing plugging straight into the amp. Just to have a reality check once in a while.
And it all depends on what the music calls for, and that's how i see what Kramer is talking about.
That documentary "it might get loud" shows it excellently. How some songs need a big rack and another only a guitar and amp or whatever.
No right or wrong with either way.
Well carry on...
This thread reminds me of what Pink Floyd said in their Pompeii movie.
They would've sounded so much better with out all dem FX.What does Pink FLoyd know about making music that people care about? *sarcasm*![]()
It's a kind of grudging acceptance though; that "still" indicates he thinks the music is cool despite the pedalboards, not because of them, so the bias against effects is there.I think what's been lost in all this is this comment from Eddie:
"There’s a bunch of guys who do the pedal board so bloody well and their music is still cool, so you can’t really make that accusation."
Dude worked with Hendrix...I don't think there's much of an anti-effects bias there. Just the usual "time and place" comments IMHO.It's a kind of grudging acceptance though; that "still" indicates he thinks the music is cool despite the pedalboards, not because of them, so the bias against effects is there.