just got mine yesterday. love the thing for long sustain notes. altho I find it glitchy at tracking (a bit faster play)
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Update to my previous post...
I moved the Mono Synth ahead of my compressor to where it's the first box in the signal chain following the tuner and amazing things happened. It now tracks like a champ. The tracking is phenomenal using fingers or pick. It even tracks through the double-stop (octaves) slide from the bass line in Runaway by Jamiroquai, picking up the lowest note in the double stop and switching to the higher octave at the end of the slide as that note takes dominance.
I didn't think having a compressor ahead of it would make such a difference, but in my case it did. So, if you're complaining about how it tracks then place it ahead of the train before tossing it out.
In a mix I'm finding that a lot of the patches get buried, other than the zingy ones running through overdrive. That's not really unexpected as a keyboard synth would have the same issue. It just doesn't "punch" due to the brief delay required to latch the note. I find that playing slightly ahead of the beat can help but it's different with each patch. One exception I've found, and one of my favorite patches in a mix for me now, is the Acid setting using an expression pedal backed off. That patch acts as a very thick octave pedal.
I'm digging it!
No, it tracks best when first in the chain.so after a compressor works the best for you?
---------------------------------------------------------------
in another note
I happen to have a b3n. using this before an step sequencer , octaver or pitch shifter works awesomely.
I have both... they are really quite different animals.So no opinions on mono vs. micro?
The Micro Synth does indeed allow for many variations but they all share a quite similar basic quality. You can change the sweep, speed and direction of the filter and ad or subtract the octaves or fuzz... and adjust the attack but any of the really useful settings tend to fall in a similar spectrum. IMHO as of today of course. Perhaps I need to spend more time exploring.Nice comparison, very useful. But I would like to add that I found the Micro Synth to be very versatile. By only changing the frequencies of the filter sweep, you could get tons of different synth sounds, from short with a lot of bite to long ambient ones. Add the four sources you feed in the filter, and the possibilities seem endless. I only got rid of it because it couldn't track properly below the A on the E string and the lack of saving presets (and the future impact came along...). Both these pedals have their merits and I fully agree that the most expensive pedal don't always suit your needs.
Can’t help on that one. I’ve never even seen the Markbass unit in person.What about mono synth vs. markbass super synth?
I have to ask my usual famous question - Which, if either, will do this?:I have both... they are really quite different animals.
The Micro Synth behaves more like an envelope filter that then uses fuzz-like clipped sound-waves to emulate the synth sounds along with the octaves. The Micro Synth does not really provide a huge variety of synth sounds. It does what it does very well and predictably.
The Mono Synth takes the input pitch and produces a separate, very specific synth waveform, including a few settings that contain some subdivided harmonics and a couple of tweakable parameters to fine tune the result. It actually has a much wider variety of available sounds than the Micro. It also does what it does very well, but less predictably since it relies on a consistent input signal and very clean, consistent technique, moreso than the Micro Synth.
Just because the Micro Synth costs more does not mean it is "better". Also, just because they both have "Synth" in the name does not mean that they are just different versions of the same thing or are mutually exclusive... again, they are quite different. I am not running them together on the same board but, who knows, maybe I will!
The Micro Synth won't get that clean slippery tone. The Mono Synth has a patch that might work in combo with an envelope filter but it won't track well enough to play some of those runs unless you play quite flawlessly.I have to ask my usual famous question - Which, if either, will do this?:
I can approximate these with my SYB-3, but it's not completely doing it for me....maybe I just need a MIDI pickup and a Moog....
The Micro Synth does indeed allow for many variations but they all share a quite similar basic quality. You can change the sweep, speed and direction of the filter and ad or subtract the octaves or fuzz... and adjust the attack but any of the really useful settings tend to fall in a similar spectrum. IMHO as of today of course. Perhaps I need to spend more time exploring.
Yep, me too.Yep, this was my experience as well. Cool pedal, especially for the price, but ended up not being that useful to me so I flipped it.