Absolutely nothing could go wrong with the most wealthy running the education system
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Musk himself admits that Twitter/X has struggled since he took over. I don't think of him as having a ton of expertise in the sciences, he's more of an opportunist who's had a few good design ideas. And seeing how childishly he behaves on Twitter these days and who he associates with, my reaction to this school is...
Absolutely nothing could go wrong with the most wealthy running the education system
He has degrees in physics and engineering. I've listened to numerous interviews with him talking about his designs with Tesla, SpaceX, and his other ventures and he really does have a rare ability to understand how to develop and create new technology in a practical and efficient manner.
He's more than just an idea man who surrounds himself with people who do the actual work. He's very much hands on in just about every part of the development process.
I think that's a valuable set of skills to learn, and if his school can teach kids how to become productive and innovative engineers, then I believe society will benefit from it.
I will add that I wasn't very impressed with the unimaginative and uninspired engineering and science education that I received at a state university back in the 90s, and I'm pretty sure that it hasn't improved since then. Certainly, high school students aren't being adequately prepared for the type of thinking required for doing high quality science as a career.
Unless you go to an elite college that specializes in science and technology, I think there's room for an alternative, and perhaps Elon Musk has the right idea.
Scary and weird.
I'm absolutely no fan of Musk. What's in question here, though, is not him running the education system, but him endowing a private school/university. That's a venerable tradition; a great many US private schools, colleges and universities bear the names of their tycoon donors, people who often are forgotten except in the names of the schools they launched. Not many people today know much about Leland Stanford, Elihu Yale, or John and Moses Brown, though Andrew Carnegie and John and Andrew Mellon may be slightly better known. If anything, I'd take it - cautiously - as a positive sign, that one of our contemporary tycoons might actually launch a project for the common good like that.
"Cautiously," though, because I don't have a whole lot of confidence in Musk to carry this off well. He may be good at tech and entrepreneurship; that doesn't make him good at everything, and he doesn't seem the type to really grasp what's needed for a great educational institution. The same attitude that makes a tech innovator successful, the conviction that their doodad is the "wave of the future" and breaking the mold of existing ways of doing things, can also lead to a very narrow-minded focus on their own preoccupations, and difficulty taking into account the rich diversity of views, experiences, methodologies and disciplines that make for a thriving learning community. The whole concept of the term "university" is precisely that universality - that it brings together in one institution so many different pursuits and approaches.
I cringe a little at the prospect of STEM-focused schools like the primary/secondary school that's reportedly supposed to grow into a university here. Two reasons for the cringe; one is that I'm an historian and narrow-minded obsession with STEM education can undercut valuable humanities education, that IMO are absolutely essential to cultivating a lifelong learning attitude and general humane understanding of life.
The other is that, when I was in grad school, I taught Latin in a charter school (this was early 2000s). I believed in the vision of that school and in the potential of the charter school movement to improve education with greater flexibility and variety. However, when I learned more about how the movement was actually playing out, I became more skeptical. An overwhelming proportion of the schools were sponsored by tech companies, and - surprise surprise - dedicated to the premise that what students needed was MORE TECH! in their learning. These tech charter schools (which I think were something like 80-90% of the institutions founded) hired fewer teachers and bought more computers and software than conventional schools, with NO actual evidence that this was a formula that led to better-educated students. The whole thing began to smell to me like a scheme to funnel taxpayer dollars into captive markets for the tech companies' products.
All in all, there's too little information to be able to tell what the prospects are for this new project of Musk's. It could be a useless vanity institution, it could be a for-profit scam passing itself off as a school, it could be a high- but narrow-minded vision that won't deliver what Musk imagines it will, it could be an odd little niche of the American education world that does its niche thing just fine, or it could actually become a meaningful and viable institution of learning. Wait and see.
Setting up to shape future minds?
Those of you with Teslas, don't forget to take it in for the recall!
A charlatan that started with daddy's money and has done a good job convincing people he is some kind of visionary and not just a narcissist infantile a-hole. And yeah, this was my opinion way before the twitter/etc debacle. The guy's a charlatan, but a hefty percentage of our population seems attracted to these types, with their agendas and overly simplistic world view/solution for everything. I view him more as a symptom than the actual disease.
No. What's really scary and weird is so many people wanting to see an education project fail. Especially one that could help underprivileged but bright students.
I don’t think anyone would wish for a school to fail. But it’s safe to assume a self-imagineered school disconnected from normalcy will have its hurdles.
It’s not as if he’s going to trust his teaching staff to do their jobs any more than he trusts his engineers.
I'm no fan boy of Musk, but it's pretty obvious that he's angered a lot of people for having the audacity to alter the way Twitter operates and therefore he must be professionally and personally destroyed.
Musk himself admits that Twitter/X has struggled since he took over. I don't think of him as having a ton of expertise in the sciences, he's more of an opportunist who's had a few good design ideas. And seeing how childishly he behaves on Twitter these days and who he associates with, my reaction to this school is...
I guess you haven’t seen the Tesla truck yet, but given it’s stealth design cues, maybe it’s just flying under the radar.Agreed.
I was hoping he would just be a great idea guy, a guy who would put the bulk of his time and energy into designing and developing the latest tech innovations. But in these days of omnipresent media, it seems that more and more people are unsatisfied with being known for actual worthwhile accomplishments. They have to constantly be SEEN AND HEARD no matter how trivial or ill-conceived their words and actions may be.
I guess you haven’t seen the Tesla truck yet, but given it’s stealth design cues, maybe it’s just flying under the radar.
Invalid Link Removed
I’ve little doubt it will be a great EV, but when was the last time you heard a pickup fanatic say they didn’t care how their truck looked.It's going to date really quickly, like a brutalist DeLorean, but it's supposedly pretty good.