seen a ton go up in the last few days, does the new head really interest people that much?
grab one if you don thave one (wd 800) what a great amp
grab one if you don thave one (wd 800) what a great amp
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I wish that was the case but it isn’t. I’m warning you not to try one out or you’ll end up with “the shiny new toy”. They’re just that good.Gotta jump on the new shiny toy.
The voicing, the tube output stage emulation, the damping factor tracking.@agedhorse what are the main differences between the wd and the new head? besides the parametric eq of course?
Different feel mostly, and there's a little more compression in the MOSFET models.how will that affect it soundwise the output stage is one more harsh or warmer than the otheR?
Were you as deep in the weeds with this design as with the previous SW models? Also, would you consider the WD800 more versatile in the mid frequencies with this new design or, is it just a different approach to shaping with just as much range/versatility?The voicing, the tube output stage emulation, the damping factor tracking.
The WD was modeled after the Walkabout, which used a MOSFET output stage, the BD-800 was modeled after the Bass 400+ which used a tube output stage.
Always happens when the new amp is released. Then in six months or so, some will realize the new one isn’t their thing and the 800Ds will start showing up in the classifieds. The circle of life.seen a ton go up in the last few days, does the new head really interest people that much?
grab one if you don thave one (wd 800) what a great amp
Good question. This amp goes more after the rock and metal tones, BUT that's a much wider palette than you might think. I started with the Bass 400+ as a baseline and then adjusted per the requests and comments that players here wanted to see added (or subtracted) from the Bass 400+, which resulted in the new amp. It's actually MUCH more versatile than you (and I) would think, but from a slightly different perspective than the WD and TT which are both more versatile but in practice just more "different than different"Were you as deep in the weeds with this design as with the previous SW models? Also, would you consider the WD800 more versatile in the mid frequencies with this new design or, is it just a different approach to shaping with just as much range/versatility?