• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

everyones selling their wd800?

Gotta jump on the new shiny toy.
I wish that was the case but it isn’t. I’m warning you not to try one out or you’ll end up with “the shiny new toy”. They’re just that good.
The WD800us a great amp and one of my favorites, but I can’t see keeping something I’m not going to play.

PS: You are correct about it being a great time to pickup a WD800! I know if I was looking for a Mesa that’s what I’d do.
 
Last edited:
@agedhorse what are the main differences between the wd and the new head? besides the parametric eq of course?
The voicing, the tube output stage emulation, the damping factor tracking.

The WD was modeled after the Walkabout, which used a MOSFET output stage, the BD-800 was modeled after the Bass 400+ which used a tube output stage.
 
how will that affect it soundwise the output stage is one more harsh or warmer than the otheR?
Different feel mostly, and there's a little more compression in the MOSFET models.
 
al due respect to Mesa and the old horse himself, but I am not going to be selling my WD800. I continue to love my Walkabout and, by extension, my WD800. These amps are exactly the sound I want from a bass amp. I was never a major fan of the Bass 400/400+ amps, but I am definitely a fan of the Walkabout/WD800.

Having said that, I continue to be impressed by Mesa's bass amp development and their commitment to great products that fit different needs for a wide range of bass needs. Plus AH's commitment to TB and our input into making amps that work so well for so many ... very cool!

Rock on Mesa!
 
The voicing, the tube output stage emulation, the damping factor tracking.

The WD was modeled after the Walkabout, which used a MOSFET output stage, the BD-800 was modeled after the Bass 400+ which used a tube output stage.
Were you as deep in the weeds with this design as with the previous SW models? Also, would you consider the WD800 more versatile in the mid frequencies with this new design or, is it just a different approach to shaping with just as much range/versatility?
 
seen a ton go up in the last few days, does the new head really interest people that much?

grab one if you don thave one (wd 800) what a great amp
Always happens when the new amp is released. Then in six months or so, some will realize the new one isn’t their thing and the 800Ds will start showing up in the classifieds. The circle of life.
 
Were you as deep in the weeds with this design as with the previous SW models? Also, would you consider the WD800 more versatile in the mid frequencies with this new design or, is it just a different approach to shaping with just as much range/versatility?
Good question. This amp goes more after the rock and metal tones, BUT that's a much wider palette than you might think. I started with the Bass 400+ as a baseline and then adjusted per the requests and comments that players here wanted to see added (or subtracted) from the Bass 400+, which resulted in the new amp. It's actually MUCH more versatile than you (and I) would think, but from a slightly different perspective than the WD and TT which are both more versatile but in practice just more "different than different" ;)

They can all get into each other's neighborhoods, but they get you there in different ways.