Ritual is their 3rd record. And I'd argue for Nothing's Shocking as a better record too, if I were into arguing about what records are better.
All of those are epic, masterful records though.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Ritual is their 3rd record. And I'd argue for Nothing's Shocking as a better record too, if I were into arguing about what records are better.
————————————————I'm in this thread about Rick Beato's Seal analysis and it got me thinking about really good second albums. What are some good ones and theories about why it happens?
First albums are often better than the rest from a given band. That make sense because at that point the band has a large body of work and can pick the best of it for that first record. All the other albums are whatever they do next.
But why sometimes is a band's second record the best one they ever do?
One theory is that the band gets record label funding and gets a great producer thrown at it. If I recall right, Trevor Horn produced that absolutely fantastic second Seal record (though he might have done the first one too).
Some examples of outstanding sophomore records that the bands never again equaled (setting aside I guess any pre-signing indie records the bands might have floating around):
- Seal 2, the inspiration for the thread.
- Train - "Drops of Jupiter". Man what a great record.
- Smashing Pumpkins - "Siamese Dream." Not sure Corgan agrees, but this to me is by far their best work.
What do you guys think?
——————Nirvana's Nevermind was arguably the biggest rock album of the 90's. I prefer the rougher quality of Bleach myself but the songwriting chops on Nevermind are very impressive and sold millions of albums (not to mention got a whole lot of bands signed). The producer, Butch Vig, also handled Siamese Dream so I'm thinking he was big part of the magic.
————-I'm in this thread about Rick Beato's Seal analysis and it got me thinking about really good second albums. What are some good ones and theories about why it happens?
First albums are often better than the rest from a given band. That make sense because at that point the band has a large body of work and can pick the best of it for that first record. All the other albums are whatever they do next.
But why sometimes is a band's second record the best one they ever do?
One theory is that the band gets record label funding and gets a great producer thrown at it. If I recall right, Trevor Horn produced that absolutely fantastic second Seal record (though he might have done the first one too).
Some examples of outstanding sophomore records that the bands never again equaled (setting aside I guess any pre-signing indie records the bands might have floating around):
- Seal 2, the inspiration for the thread.
- Train - "Drops of Jupiter". Man what a great record.
- Smashing Pumpkins - "Siamese Dream." Not sure Corgan agrees, but this to me is by far their best work.
What do you guys think?
—————————@Altitude "First albums are often better than the rest from a given band."
I often used to think, back in the '70s, that it was actually the 4th album of many bands that were their best. As examples, Black Sabbath and Led Zeppelin and there are many others. That said, there are certainly many bands who were at their best with their first album.
Can't say I agree with Alice in Chains, they made a very strong first record with Facelift.Alice in Chans DirtView attachment 4299558