You know, I’ve always had mixed feelings about clones and copies. On one hand, yeah, they’re riding the coattails of someone else’s design. On the other hand, they often reinforce the status of the original brand—like unpaid marketing.
Case in point: I started out on a Fender Jazz copy—an old Ibanez Silver Series bass. Loved it. Eventually, I saved up and dropped a whole month’s pay on the “real” Fender, thinking I’d finally made it.
Well… after a month of playing and two pro setups, I had to admit—the Ibanez was just a better instrument. That was a tough pill to swallow, but it also made me appreciate that sometimes the copy isn’t just a stand-in—it’s the better tool.
So did the clone hurt Fender in that case? Or did it lead me to Fender, only for me to learn something deeper about quality vs branding?
It’s not black and white. I think clones do play a role, and sometimes they even teach you what matters most.