Here's my 2 cents on the whole subject. It is wrong to use his name claiming that the instrument was made by, or licensed by Ken when it was not. I think we were clear on that, and no one is arguing that fact. As for the word spam using Ken Smith "style", that is a minor technicality rule breakage, big whoop. No different than Rondo music selling their cheap crap knock offs, with FREE FENDER PICKS just to get the word fender in the ad. Maybe if this builder raised his price by 20 bucks, and threw in a set of Ken Smith strings, poster, or whatever else he could find....it would be a clear way to beat the rule without violating it. How many of you throwing stones here own an SX? So not only do you buy instruments with their design ripped off, but it is okay for one guy to word spam, and not another?
How many of you own a fender knock off? 80% or better I am guessing. Sugar coat it all you'd like, it's the EXACT Same thing. Difference is, some of the Fender knock offs are 4-5x the price of the originals, on a design they had nothing to do with. Ken himself licensed his name to be used on an import fender knock-off line. Not that they aren't fine basses, but they are what they are.
This fella making knock offs at a reasonable price is no more wrong than any other company copying other time tested designs......headstock notched differently or not. Personally, I love project instruments and would consider putting one of these together myself. Not saying it is right, or it's wrong....but the hypocrisy here is astounding.
Lastly, our brazilian friend is also a talkbass member, and is to be treated with the same respect, and fall under the same rules as everyone else, unless I am mistaken....the insults and name calling are childish and uncalled for.
Hey Luchi, want a fair and balanced review of your work? Send me one of your choice....I will personally assemble it, set it up, and bring it to the next Bowlus bass bash for inspection and input/reviews from some of the biggest hitters on talkbass.