> So the fact that folks are willing to pay thousands for 40 yr old basses does make sense to you?
If someone has got the thousands, and they're willing to pay for something that's rare, collectible and hard to get, then why wouldn't it make sense?
In the end it all boils down to how much money you've got, what you want to buy, and how much you're likely to miss the money after you spend it. The perception of value is in the eye of the shopper. Obviously, expensive boutique gear will make no sense to people who are inclined to buy a Squier because they're price sensitive.
To be totally objective about it: the vintage gear and even the reproduction gear pricing relates to supply and demand. The supply of vintage basses is fixed in number and getting smaller. The supply of new production basses is potentially without limit. So there's a definite supply side difference in the market place between old and new. Old is hard to get. You have to hunt. You spend time and money. New is easy to get. You just spend money.
There's also a difference in demand. The new basses are made differently than the old ones. Some people want basses that are made the old way, and not basses that are built out of glued together scraps of wood. Those people aren't convinced that there's no difference, they think that there is a difference. It doesn't matter if they're right or wrong, their perception of the difference and their money supply defines their viewpoint on whether or not the pricing makes sense to them. The perception of value is an individual decision, not a universal truth.
> To rationlize they define it as mojo and it makes sense all of a sydden...nah
I don't buy into the "mojo" side of things at all, but that's just me. To me, I've always played the same instrument for 35 years. It feels right. The new production stuff feels wrong to me. If I want a new bass, my only options are to accept that basses are made today that just feel "wrong" to me, or to see if I can find a bass that feels "right" to me. If I'm willing to pay what it costs for something that feels right, then I'm purchasing something that has value to me. It really doesn't matter if someone else perceives that same value or not because it's going to be my instrument, not theirs. To me, mojo isn't even a factor in the equation.
Even though mojo means nothing to me personally, if the perception of mojo adds value for someone else, I don't see anything wrong with that.
Wow, very enlightening post, I must say. Thanks for that - really enjoyed reading it. Thanks so much for speaking so candidly - it really made me think.....And before I express my feelings on this - I too would agree wholeheartedly - if the perception of mojo adds value for someone else - I certainly don't see anything wrong with that either.
This is really hard to talk about and put into words and I know I risk insulting most if not all of the members on TB. If so, I apologize in advance and remember, take this with a grain of salt - this is just me. Wacky weird me.
I have always kind of been a "vibe" guy. That sixth sense you have that kind of kicks in when you play a pre-owned instrument. Some used, older or vintage instruments simply seem kind of creepy to me. Sometimes, I can't plug into the good energy of the instrument no matter what it's reputation, and maybe that is simply my short coming. I don't think I am more overly sensitive than the next guy - but more often that not - a vintage instrument, regardless of price or stature - just seems like a loser to me.
In those cases, I don't think any amount of love and pampering from me is going to change that. It's like I don't have any reason to be subject to the hard times and bad energy that this instrument has been subjected to. It's not going to improve my playing or songwriting, and it's certainly not going to inspire me on any level.
There is kind of a thing about drag energy - you know - always try in your life to surround yourself with people who pull you up - not people who try and pull you down. The closest I can come is to say that in some crazy way basses are somehow kind of like that for me.
For me, older instruments belonging a previous owner or a number of previous owners - there was almost always a sense of stigma about them. When I checked them out - maybe the vibe was OK overall, but something dark seemed to be lurking deep within. It wasn't an alluring or mysterious kind of dark, it was simply a bad vibe feeling in the pit of my stomach.
For the record, I realize that I am doing a horrible job of explaining this, but in my naivety and lack of fear, I trudge on...and I am hoping that at least one poor soul on TB can relate to what I have to say. Go ahead, fire away - I suppose I deserve it for being completely honest.
For these reasons, and probably a few others - I always felt it best to take my chances with owning and breaking in new instruments as much as possible. I like to be the captain of the vibe on the instruments I choose to play. Maybe it is simply the OCD control freak in me that always wants to be sure and christen them my way from birth - and inject them with good vibe, positive energy and my own infectious spirit and work ethic.
Maybe one day I will find a vintage instrument that completely devastates me and I will spring for it - been waiting for that day for many years....But so far, to buy a vintage instrument, or even a relic - well - if you understand the above - you will understand why it is not for me.
Excuse the self importance and all of the other shortcomings of this post. Kind of like therapy for me in a rather bizarre way.