• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Fender Rumble 800 Combo Thread for the NEW 2022 800 Combo

I only played my R800C at home. Very satisfied on the tone. Very useful the 100W switch.
I prefer to cut low and high to 11:00 and boost mids to 13:00.
I also like the drive channel, but at low drive setting.
I haven't played it in venues, so I can't say anything about it, but there are users who have already played it in clubs with satisfaction.
 
I only played my R800C at home. Very satisfied on the tone. Very useful the 100W switch.
I prefer to cut low and high to 11:00 and boost mids to 13:00.
I also like the drive channel, but at low drive setting.
I haven't played it in venues, so I can't say anything about it, but there are users who have already played it in clubs with satisfaction.
Did you get yours from StrumentiMusicali for 699 €? They were out of stock when I checked. They were also the only ones offering a discount. and 200 € is a BIG discount. Thomann has now added it on their website, for 866 €! I just checked, and StrumentiMusicali has raised their price to 839 €. With the 20 € shipping charge to France, that's basically the same price as Thomann, who I buy a lot from and been very happy with their service (I have a Marcus Miller Sire U5 bass on the way; due here Thursday!).
 
Last edited:
Did you get yours from StrumentiMusicali for 699 €? They were out of stock when I checked. They were also the only ones offering a discount. and 200 € is a BIG discount. Thomann has now added it on their website, for 866 €! I just checked, and StrumentiMusicali has raised their price to 839 €. With the 20 € shipping charge to France, that's basically the same price as Thomann, who I buy a lot from and been very happy with their service (I have a Marcus Miller Sire U5 bass on the way; due here Thursday!).

Yes, I bought it from Link Removed for 699€.
The price rised 10 days ago to 799€, from this week to 839€.
 
I returned my 800c today. It's a very nice amp but I prefer the 500c. I played several gigs over the weekend with the 800 at venues I've played before with the 500. The 800 just did not have the presence and fullness of the 500. Something that was weird is that the amp sounds really good but any time I played a D note it just disappeared and was very compressed compared to other frequencies, especially the D on the A string, 5th fret. I think it comes down to the voicing of the amp and the difference between neo and ceramic magnets.
I'm also returning my 800c for the 500c. I'm gutted about doing so, but here's why:
1. As you mentioned, its difficult to get a "full" sound out of the 800. The 800 doesn't.....well....RUMBLE! The clarity is unreal and I will be sad to lose it. The 500c sounds more "muffled" like there's a cloth covering the speakers, where as the 800c is inherently bright, crisp, and clean. I didn't find it punchy and deep, which is important to me. It was hard to get a "bad" sound out the eq settings on the 800c, where-as the 500c I'm struggling to dial in a setting that mimics the quality of the 800c.
2. There is a very, very definite "clipping"/snapping sound when plucking anywhere on the E string of any of my basses be it passive or active. It reminds me of sounds I'd get out of the MXR-87 compressor. Dislike strongly. Is there hidden compression in the 800c? If you've ever tried blasting a bass through headphones, it's similar in that regard. The clipping was worse at 100W, oddly enough. It was present through headphones and running through FOH. Completely unacceptable. It would be at its absolute worst with the amp mic'd or running through the house. I called Fender about the issue. The guy on the phone was nice but was very blunt when he told me, "well, what did you expect from some cheap stuff from overseas? They're meant to be workhorses. You plug them in and they do their job, but they're not well made." I was floored! $850 for me, is not cheap! Plus, how is that good customer service? In any case, it seems like it's a known issue, but he suggested simply taking it back to the shop, which I did.
I should note also, that I had a sound guy who had been in a pretty popular regional band (he's also the band director at our high school) check it out. He agreed that it sounded great, but there's a definitive clipping happening, despite aggressive low end eq settings and heavy handed attack on the bass. I mean...I could lightly pluck a string and it'd happen.
I asked @ClassicJazz if he noticed this issue, and he said he didn't. Maybe I got a bad unit?
3. Extra headroom???? I don't think so. The 800c was near impossible to compete with drums. Plus, any attempt to increase presence resulted in the aforementioned issues. The 500 actually seems louder...it actually RUMBLES.
4. When I coupled the 800c with a 210....all the magic was gone. The quality and high definition of the new neo speakers from the 800 was instantly dulled by the warm presence of the 210. Basically, it ended up sounding like a rumble 500. So why not just save a few hundred bucks and couple a 500c with a 210 to effectively get the same sound. Forget the extra wattage....there was NO difference volume-wise between the 500c and the 800 w/ 210. Again, I'm confused at the advertised extra headroom, as it made no difference in this scenario. I can't try another 800c, as this is the only one in town. I simply couldn't trade it for another at this time, and I need something now.

I apologize for the long rant, but this was a frustrating journey. I would like to thank G-Dawg for all the help with my questions. At the end of the day, sometimes newer isn't better. Maybe I simply got a bad unit. I'll settle for the 500c for now because at least it's predictable and has presence. I do wish my city had more options, however. I really would love to try GK and Ampeg amps. All we have in our town is Orange, Peavey, Vox, and Fender.
 
Last edited:
I'm also returning my 800c for the 500c. I'm gutted about doing so, but here's why:
1. As you mentioned, its difficult to get a "full" sound out of the 800. The 800 doesn't.....well....RUMBLE! The clarity is unreal and I will be sad to lose it. The 500c sounds more "muffled" like there's a cloth covering the speakers, where as the 800c is inherently bright, crisp, and clean. I didn't find it punchy and deep, which is important to me. It was hard to get a "bad" sound out the eq settings on the 800c, where-as the 500c I'm struggling to dial in a setting that mimics the quality of the 800c.
2. There is a very, very definite "clipping"/snapping sound when plucking anywhere on the E string of any of my basses be it passive or active. It reminds me of sounds I'd get out of the MXR-87 compressor. Dislike strongly. Is there hidden compression in the 800c? If you've ever tried blasting a bass through headphones, it's similar in that regard. The clipping was worse at 100W, oddly enough. It was present through headphones and running through FOH. Completely unacceptable. It would be at its absolute worst with the amp mic'd or running through the house. I called Fender about the issue. The guy on the phone was nice but was very blunt when he told me, "well, what did you expect from some cheap stuff from overseas? They're meant to be workhorses. You plug them in and they do their job, but they're not well made." I was floored! $850 for me, is not cheap! Plus, how is that good customer service? In any case, it seems like it's a known issue, but he suggested simply taking it back to the shop, which I did.
I should note also, that I had a sound guy who had been in a pretty popular regional band (he's also the band director at our high school) check it out. He agreed that it sounded great, but there's a definitive clipping happening, despite aggressive low end eq settings and heavy handed attack on the bass. I mean...I could lightly pluck a string and it'd happen.
I asked @ClassicJazz if he noticed this issue, and he said he didn't. Maybe I got a bad unit?
3. Extra headroom???? I don't think so. The 800c was near impossible to compete with drums. Plus, any attempt to increase presence resulted in the aforementioned issues. The 500 actually seems louder...it actually RUMBLES.
4. When I coupled the 800c with a 210....all the magic was gone. The quality and high definition of the new neo speakers from the 800 was instantly dulled by the warm presence of the 210. Basically, it ended up sounding like a rumble 500. So why not just save a few hundred bucks and couple a 500c with a 210 to effectively get the same sound. Forget the extra wattage....there was NO difference volume-wise between the 500c and the 800 w/ 210. Again, I'm confused at the advertised extra headroom, as it made no difference in this scenario. I can't try another 800c, as this is the only one in town. I simply couldn't trade it for another at this time, and I need something now.

I apologize for the long rant, but this was a frustrating journey. I would like to thank G-Dawg for all the help with my questions. At the end of the day, sometimes newer isn't better. Maybe I simply got a bad unit. I'll settle for the 500c for now because at least it's predictable and has presence. I do wish my city had more options, however. I really would love to try GK and Ampeg amps. All we have in our town is Orange, Peavey, Vox, and Fender.

I found the overall tone from 800x just sound cleaner and tighter but lacking heft than 500c while i try both at music store. But din't notice the clipping issue on 800c since i just try it with volume around 11 o clock.

Now look like some 800c owner not satisfied with 800c tone, i do believe the 500c and 200c continuously keep sell great in rumble line.
 
I agree with this. The 800 is definitely cleaner with more clarity. IN the mix, the 500 was just more satisfying to me due to the fullness and punch. I totally hear what you're hearing in regards to the "muffled-cloth covered speaker." For me it just seems to work in the mix better. The 800 sounds great but is lacking something.

I'll add that I've tried the most recent Ampeg offerings and will say that I did not care for them. I bought both the 500c and the 210 Ampeg equivalent at the same time and it was an easy decision on which to keep.

I'm also returning my 800c for the 500c. I'm gutted about doing so, but here's why:
1. As you mentioned, its difficult to get a "full" sound out of the 800. The 800 doesn't.....well....RUMBLE! The clarity is unreal and I will be sad to lose it. The 500c sounds more "muffled" like there's a cloth covering the speakers, where as the 800c is inherently bright, crisp, and clean. I didn't find it punchy and deep, which is important to me. It was hard to get a "bad" sound out the eq settings on the 800c, where-as the 500c I'm struggling to dial in a setting that mimics the quality of the 800c.
 
I agree with this. The 800 is definitely cleaner with more clarity. IN the mix, the 500 was just more satisfying to me due to the fullness and punch. I totally hear what you're hearing in regards to the "muffled-cloth covered speaker." For me it just seems to work in the mix better. The 800 sounds great but is lacking something.

I'll add that I've tried the most recent Ampeg offerings and will say that I did not care for them. I bought both the 500c and the 210 Ampeg equivalent at the same time and it was an easy decision on which to keep.

I think will try out how the tone between 800c Vs 800H+R210 cab soon. I do believe one of the reason cause tone different are Neo vs Ceramic.
 
I found the overall tone from 800x just sound cleaner and tighter but lacking heft than 500c while i try both at music store. But din't notice the clipping issue on 800c since i just try it with volume around 11 o clock./QUOTE]
I found the overall tone from 800x just sound cleaner and tighter but lacking heft than 500c while i try both at music store. But din't notice the clipping issue on 800c since i just try it with volume around 11 o'clock
I'd get clipping at 10 o'clock master with the gain at 8 o'clock even. It was very disappointing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yahboy
I'd get clipping at 10 o'clock master with the gain at 8 o'clock even. It was very disappointing.

I dint play aggressively , but that day i set the gain at 9 oclcock (just like my personal setting on my previous R200/150) on both 800c and 500c . It seem something wrong on your 800c.

Suggest exchange to another unit to try out. But the heft are notable lacking on 800c, the Vintage button engage along with little amount of Overdrive and increase Bass knob do help.
 
I found the overall tone from 800x just sound cleaner and tighter but lacking heft than 500c while i try both at music store. But din't notice the clipping issue on 800c since i just try it with volume around 11 o clock.

Now look like some 800c owner not satisfied with 800c tone, i do believe the 500c and 200c continuously keep sell great in rumble line.

There are some of us who have owned both the 500c and the 800 and prefer the 800. I feel no need to laud the amp after every rant.
 
I dint play aggressively , but that day i set the gain at 9 oclcock (just like my personal setting on my previous R200/150) on both 800c and 500c . It seem something wrong on your 800c.

Suggest exchange to another unit to try out. But the heft are notable lacking on 800c, the Vintage button engage along with little amount of Overdrive and increase Bass knob do help.

I would like to try another unit, if there was one near by for me to try. I don't want to go through the whole ordering process just to have another unit do the same. Plus, the common consensus seems to be that the 800c does not in fact rumble. It's sad that Fender got this so wrong. I'll stick with the 500c for now, maybe nab a 210 cab after the new year. But, I'm gonna just save-up for that "rig of my dreams", whatever that may be. I really want to try GK. There's a GK head, 410, and 115 used for $1,300 a few hours drive from me. I REALLY want to try it out!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yahboy
Agreed. The 800c will definitely work for some/many, and certainly be preferred over the 500c. The Fender rep's response is concerning and probably should not have been expressed. Of course it might be true, but still.... I don't like the fact that these amps apparently can't be worked on, at least not very easily. Fender seems to prefer to just replace units that are under warranty as opposed to replacing parts. When my amp is out of warranty I'm going to worry.

Agree. I think it will work for some people. Just didn't work for me. I was mostly irked by the clipping and the fact the tech at Fender was aware of it and didn't seem to care.
 
I setted the gain at h12:00, master at h11:00, switch to low (so, 100W), but I had no clipping issue. I have a CGCF tuning, I had no clipping onto lower C string.

I can't say anything about the difference between the 800C and the 500C, I have never owned a 500C.
It's very, very subtle. Did your red flight flash amber for a second? Were you playing an active bass when you tried?
 
No amber flashing led.
By manual, if the led is flashing amber, so the amp is clipping and I hope it's normal to hear it (the clip).
I wasn't playing active bass, I'm sorry, I have only a Fender Precison MiM, so a passive instrument.
Makes sense. When I tried with my passive bass, I was able to crank the master and gain louder. With active basses, I had to dial those down substantially. I expected that would happen. Never the less, I never got a full sound out of the amp.

Also, you have your lows cut quite a bit. I had mine boosted about 1-2 o'clock in a frail attempt to actually "feel" the bass. I imagine that contributed a little bit to the clipping. But, on the 500c, I can boost bass on amp and on-board eq, get the fullness I need, and feel it in the room. Just sad I couldn't have the best of both in the 800c.

You sacrifice "something" by going with either of the two amps, so those buying should figure out what's most important to their mix. Deeper, rumbling lows with weak highs (500c), or higher definition, clear mids and highs with weak lows (800).
 
Last edited: