COAX (coaxial) and screened cable are not quite the same thing (we won't go there) but otherwise they both have a braid shield (usually).Instrument cable is always coax?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
COAX (coaxial) and screened cable are not quite the same thing (we won't go there) but otherwise they both have a braid shield (usually).Instrument cable is always coax?
Instrument cables are shielded and speaker cable are separate conductors in their own jacket.Difference between speaker and instrument cables is...?
This is an interesting topic and goes back to early days before 'active' guitars/bass's and valve gear. A non-active guitar/bass really needs to see a resistance of about 1M ohms (1,000,000 ohms!) from the amp for it to work properly, tone control to work right and to sound OK. These really 'high' operating 'impedances' or resistance makes stuff incredibly prone to picking up all kinds of noise from local radio stations and hell knows what if the cable isn't shielded.The important difference is the impedance & shielding.
A instrument wire provides too much impedance to the amp & can fry it.
A speaker wire for an instrument has no shielding & will pick up any EMI noise in the room.
Many instrument cables are unbalanced, so shielding is highly recommended. If the instrument is outputting a balanced signal, then shielding should be used. The plus and minus wires on the cables need to be twisted. I would also like the balanced cables shielded.Instrument cable is always coax?
This always seemed very unnatural to me in the past: a non active (so a low level and not amplified) signal has to go into a high resistance amp to sound right? You would expect it would need very low resistance instead. Info [Invalid or Expired Link Removed] cleared that up.A non-active guitar/bass really needs to see a resistance of about 1M ohms (1,000,000 ohms!) from the amp for it to work properly, tone control to work right and to sound OK.
Yup.. We're not too often seeing gear with passive/active inputs, the difference being input impedance.I've only used a speaker wire as an instrument wire once, by mistake, & the noise was immediately noticeable.
Luckily I've never used a instrument wire for a speaker, because you might not realize until it's too late.
This is the sort of discussion that I find extremely confusing. Perhaps it’s because of the terminology.This is an interesting topic and goes back to early days before 'active' guitars/bass's and valve gear. A non-active guitar/bass really needs to see a resistance of about 1M ohms (1,000,000 ohms!) from the amp for it to work properly, tone control to work right and to sound OK. These really 'high' operating 'impedances' or resistance makes stuff incredibly prone to picking up all kinds of noise from local radio stations and hell knows what if the cable isn't shielded.
This legacy and still popular and non-active instruments still requires the need for good shielded cable. Active instruments mind you offer much better immunity to 'noise' due to their much lower loading requirements..
Phew @D M C .. Good questions and I'm not gonna go on too long here as the subject will go on forever. There's some good analogies made.This is the sort of discussion that I find extremely confusing. Perhaps it’s because of the terminology.
When I hear impedance and resistance, I assume we’re referring to the flow of current. Since passive electronics in an instrument produce current by induction produced by the vibration of strings within a magnetic field, I assume that the current produced is fairly minuscule. I would think that you’d want as low an impedance or low a resistance as possible so that that minuscule current would make it from the pickup(s) to the amplifier.
Therefore, I can see that the need for a shielded cable would be desirable for an instrument cable since we’re dealing with a tiny current, it seem to me that the shielding would be irrelevant in a speaker cable. Why not just make them all shielded and stop worrying about which is which?
This confused me in the past as well but check the link I put above.When I hear impedance and resistance, I assume we’re referring to the flow of current. Since passive electronics in an instrument produce current by induction produced by the vibration of strings within a magnetic field, I assume that the current produced is fairly minuscule. I would think that you’d want as low an impedance or low a resistance as possible so that that minuscule current would make it from the pickup(s) to the amplifier.
I think of the cables as hoses, transferring electrons from one place to another.This confused me in the past as well but check the link I put above.
You want the voltage to be high enough to get a good signal, even though the source level is small.
Instead of thinking of a high load of an amp as a resistor, so reducing the level, to a lower impedance bass guitar output, think of it as a funnel, the source being the wider input and the amp being the smaller output. It will prevent the source signal from draining out too soon and getting too low to provide enough signal into the amp.
If the load of the amp was lower (lower impedance), the funnel would be reverse. The small voltage on the input side would drop considerably more on the output side because of the wide output so it would feed a poor signal into the amp.
Just my simple take on a small part of this subject ;-)
there are other anologies used such as the electric-hydraulic anology. Where a device similar to a turbo can used as an ampliferI think of the cables as hoses, transferring electrons from one place to another.
Here’s an analogy I use, which may be wrong, but...
The instrument’s electronics are like a car’s fuel system: passive electronics being a carbureted, naturally aspirated fuel supply and active electronics a turbocharged fuel system. The pipeline doesn’t really matter, it just moves the fuel from the source to the engine.
The amplifier is the engine in the analogy, converting the fuel into useful work, and the output of the engine is the drive shaft (or propeller shaft for our commonwealth friends) which may be attached to 2 drive wheels (8 ohms) or 4 drive wheels (4 ohms) or some other configuration.
Anyway, the cables (to get back on topic) are a conduit for the fuel/current and should introduce as little resistance as possible to maximize efficiency. Or am I completely off base here?
two good points,Since speaker cable is not shielded. I was in a band that always had help setting up. So the guy that owned the pa - made all the speaker cable with that orange power cord with speakon connectors.
Worked real well - If it was orange it was a speaker cable - just my 10cents.
Lenny

Very Good Questions @LeoFromPortland. All speaker cables are unbalanced no matter what type of connectors it may have. The same is true of shielded instrument cables. The only balanced cables are microphone cables. Out of phase issues deal more with speaker cabinets being miswired.ok I have one more possibly ignorant question.
Is the quarter inch speaker out on the Rumble amps balanced or unbalanced? I was just curious. The recommended speaker cable on a store's website is a TS (unbalanced) cable.
So if a person was to plug a unbalanced cable into a balanced speaker out, wouldn't that degrade the signal? I'm not one to b*tch on websites but if that actually is a problem I'd probably write a friendly note. I'm guessing a great many buyers may not frequent this site hehe. More importantly, I am curious if unbalanced to balanced or balanced to unbalanced degrades the signal or somehow puts it out of phase.