• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Fender Rumble Club

I think I may be on the eve of a NBD this evening! I have a Dr.'s appointment tomorrow, and the wife just informed me that we could visit Guitar Center and pick out a belated birthday present!

I'm very excited, but I don't know what I should get! First choice would be an Epi Thunderbird in white or black, but if not available, I am thinking about a Players Series P or J...(trying to stay well short of a grand)

Anything else I should be looking at? (obviously, my tastes are more "traditional", and I play 4 strings only, so...)

I am PSYCHED!!!!
For the money cant beat a Epiphone Jack Casady Hollow Body
 
  • Like
Reactions: Miles_ONeal
Just a theoretical question on the topic at hand: If you were to daisy chain two R100's (or R200's or whatever) via the FX loop, could you still tie into the FX loop with a pedal board, ie. SLAVE FX SEND>PB>MASTER FX RETURN, MASTER FX SEND>SLAVE FX RETURN? Or some other Rube Goldberg combination?

Tim

?:confused:? Hmmm, seems you pose a logical circular reference, Timbo. Assuming the recommended standard Primary Send (path from the preamp upstream) to Secondary Return (path to the power amp downstream) for the chaining:

A. The Secondary Send receives no signal from the Secondary Preamp, therefore it has nothing to Send! :oops:

2. Any signal going to the Primary Return is amplified only by the Primary and is not sent anywhere else. :rolleyes:

¥. With the daisy chaining using both FX Loops, as recommended for chaining, mono pedals wanted to be in both Master & Slave would need to go to the Input of the Master. :)

☆. Stereo pedals could receive the Primary Send signal and give one channel ouput to each Primary & Secondary Return! :woot:
. You could make a "dry" & "wet" chained system with the Primary Send to pedalboard input and the pedalboard output to the Secondary Return. This would give you a "dry" Primary tone and a "wet" Secondary tone. :D

£. OR the pedalboard output could go to the Secondary Input to use the Secondary preamp as another "virtual pedal" for the "wet" Secondary tone. :smug:
I'm sure your friend Rube could come up with some more interesting scenarios. These are just the first that came to my mind. ;)
.

So... No..? :meh:

Tim


So... Yes, Tim, you can tie in a pedalboard while daisy chaining combos, but it's complicated. ;)

You described what I called "the recommended standard" chaining here:

... ... MASTER FX SEND>SLAVE FX RETURN? ... ...

And I added the parenthetical definitions to my [now PC corrected] "Primary Send (path from the preamp upstream) to Secondary Return (path to the power amp downstream)" in recognition of the 2 sides of each combo. Both sides of the Primary are usually involved, but only the Return side of the Secondary is usually involved.

You proposed an invalid "circular reference in logic" here:

... ... SLAVE FX SEND>PB>MASTER FX RETURN, ... ...

It is invalid because "A. The Secondary Send [usually gets] no signal from the Secondary Preamp, therefore it has nothing to Send", because the Primary Send to the Secondary Return is usually the only signal to the Secondary. But, then connecting that empty Secondary Send signal, either thru a PB or directly, to the Primary Return bypasses the Primary Input and preamp, which effectively mutes the Primary power amp and speaker with that empty Secondary Send signal. So... No, that particular arrangement won't work very well.

All my paragraphs after #2 just describe ways that, Yes, you can use pedals with chaining! But, paragraph #£ uses non-standard chaining where the Primary Send goes to the Secondary Input to use it's preamp.

That's all. So... you ask a theoretical question invoking Rube Goldberg, you get a complicated answer. ;)
.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: trseal and JPDsma
For the money cant beat a Epiphone Jack Casady Hollow Body


Amen, to the Epi JC being a great bass, Rob! But, yeah, that was over 4 years ago. He actually got a Fender Player Jaguar about a year and a half after that!

Robby, I see you recently got a Rumble Stage 800! Well, it's not required to read this entire thread to join The Club. So ... ...

@Robert Boshoven, you are now member #1589 in the Fender Rumble Club. Congratulations and welcome. Put that number in your TalkBass Signature for safe keeping. Then make yourself at home here and on your Rumble Club Wiki page, the repository of all Rumbling wisdom and knowledge.

Rob, this thread is the main Rumble Club home for discussing general Rumbleness and non-modeling Rumble particulars. For discussing bass modeling particulars please use The Club's Rumble LT25, Studio 40 & Stage 800 sub-thread, OK? That's to keep those sometimes complicated modeling posts from confusing our non-modeling Rumble brothers & sisters here. :D

So, Bob, how's about telling us a bit about yourself, such as your bass experience in general and your Rumble journey in particular? You're bound to fit right in here since we have all kinds. But we all love to ... .... ...

Rumble On!
.
 
Been using my rumble 100 at this really small gig. Doing a really good job. Better than I thought it would !
F160864B-9AD0-4EE7-8307-7F11E8ADD6DA.jpeg
 
You could put a speaker jack on one Rumble 100 and use the speaker out on a Rumble 200 to get the full 200 watts. Now daisy chain that to a second Rumble 100 and stack all three for a 300 watt 2x12 + 1x15 monster!

Or even easier, simply use a Radial Twin City splitter and run one side to the Rumble 200 and the other side to the two daisy chained Rumble 100s for a 340 watt 2x12 + 1x15 monster!

Even better, I could do it the second way and run the send from the Rumble 200 to my Rumble 15 for a 355 watt 2x12 + 1x15 + 1x8 Monster. Set that on the Auralex Gramma for a 6' 5" Herman Munster!
+1 for Auralex GRAMMA v2! I have the middle size because it originally had my 200c sitting on it.

ofhRqu6.jpg


 
What do you all like for drive pedals for your V3 series Rumbles? (apart from the built-in drive which is quite nice)... thinking angry but not distorted full on or fuzzy. Cranked amp kinda stuff.
I have been really enjoying my Darkglass Alpha Omega pedal. I use it very minimally, chasing tube warmth rather than full on heavy duty distortion. It's incredibly versatile. I had a SansAmp BDDI v.1 before that and no regrets with the change. I must get around to trying that along with the Rumble inbuilt distortion. I'd like to find a way to use both together
 
You're always ahead of the curve, GP.

(Actually, when I first got my R40, I tried alla those buttons in different combinations. I just didn't think to remember what I tried or what I liked.)
Remember? Nah.
I leave the VINTAGE in on all 3 Rumbles-40/100/200c-at all times(yes, I've tried them with it out/off-nope). I use BRIGHT if I feel the room is kinda boom-y.