• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Fender Starcaster (the modern player series reissue)

Makt13

Guest
Nov 5, 2017
6
3
I have a Fender Starcaster (the modern player series reissue) and I'm thinking about replacing the pickups and/or the pots because of the muddy tone which is a common complaint for this bass.

Does anyone have any experience or advice of replacing the pickups or pots on a Starcaster bass?
 
Does it look like this?

a3ff79cfd9da50690f2e82ef51e2ebc2.jpg
 
Beautiful basses.
A friend plays one and I know he did some re-wiring.
I'm honestly not sure whether it was to improve a muddy tone but I'll find out.

He does play in a vintage rockabilly band so it's quite possible he likes the muddy sound!
 
  • Like
Reactions: nixdad
I gig my Starcaster and haven't found too much issue with mud. I usually eq my amp settings at 1 or 2 o'clock for everything and set both tone knobs at 7 and I get pretty good honk out of her or switch to neck pup for mud or rear for some twang. I really like the sounds she makes, but I don't use pedals or such, so there could be a difference.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3670.JPG
    IMG_3670.JPG
    257.4 KB · Views: 218
  • Like
Reactions: Border and DirtDog
I've been curious about the Starcaster, but have never found one out in the wild for me to try before I buy. My main concern is a lot people have mentioned that it's fairly heavy. I would have hoped that a semi-hollow wouldn't have that issue. Otherwise, everything else looks great on paper!
 
  • Like
Reactions: nixdad
I've been curious about the Starcaster, but have never found one out in the wild for me to try before I buy. My main concern is a lot people have mentioned that it's fairly heavy. I would have hoped that a semi-hollow wouldn't have that issue. Otherwise, everything else looks great on paper!

I've been playing the Starcaster bass for a few months now. At least a dozen gigs under my belt with it. I don't find it heavy but it is bulky (no belly or forearm cut might not appeal to some). I wouldn't call it muddy so much as "round and wooly" if that makes sense. I prefer the middle pickup position (both bridge and neck pickups engaged). If it want it more "grindy", I just run the bridge. But I guess it depends on the type of music you're playing.

It's not the perfect bass, but it's pretty damned cool looking and cool sounding, to me....

It hangs fairly balanced for me. Maybe a tiny little bit of neck dive.
 
I've been curious about the Starcaster, but have never found one out in the wild for me to try before I buy. My main concern is a lot people have mentioned that it's fairly heavy. I would have hoped that a semi-hollow wouldn't have that issue. Otherwise, everything else looks great on paper!
I tried a few, and yeah they are heavy. Plus a bolt on neck on a semi acoustic just doesn’t feel right to me. Have you looked at the Jack Casady? 34” scale, set neck and about 8lbs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Band Mom
I've glanced at the Casady online, but have also never seen that one in stores. I suppose I never really looked at it much because I prefer the versatility of two pickups, but I'm just now reading about the Vari-gain toggle, which sounds interesting. I might need to broaden my search.