• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass Focus is sacrifice…right?

Perhaps it's useful to think of the idea of opportunity cost. If you focus on one instrument, the opportunity cost is the ability to play/work with multiple instruments. If you spread your focus to multiple instruments, the opportunity cost is typically a slower rate of development.

This is where it comes down to your priorities. Do you think it's more important to quickly develop skills on one instrument, or is it better to explore and learn about multiple instruments.

Another idea you might want to consider is the distinction between being a musician (general) and being a specific type of instrumentalist. In some ways, learning multiple instruments should eventually make you a better musician overall. But this may be at the expense of the technical proficiency you may achieve if you specialize. This is not to say you are one or the other, rather there is general knowledge that relates broadly to everyone, and specific knowledge that relates only to your specific instrument and style. You choose which type of knowledge is more important, which informs where you place your focus.

As a musician, an upright bass player may choose to take improvisation lessons from any instrumentalists and is not limited to learning from other upright players. A very competent upright player would be better for working on technique, but you are likely to learn more and better ideas IMHO by exploring the improv approaches of different types of instrumentalists.

Although natural interests and aptitude have a role in your path, you can also envision the future to see what you think is possible; then choose a path that facilitates your goal. IMHO we are each different. Some will focus early, and some like myself will always tend to dabble, because versatility is intrinsic to our personality. Trust me it's not just the way I think about music.

Let's put things in perspective. Music school turn thousands of graduates but most do not make a living as professional musicians, or even teachers. I dropped out of collected after the 3rd semester, and somehow I still ended up as a successful professional musician, despite my somewhat heretical views. Oddly I never had any expectation that I would be professional musician, but apparently that was my path.
 
A person who competently doubles on bass guitar and upright tends to get more work than someone who slays on only one of them. To make a living on one, you need to be exceptional. In my experience, my skills on upright opened up more opportunities than bass guitar. Usually there are significantly fewer competent upright players, I.E. less competition for jobs.

IMHO, most musical services do not require prodigy level skill. However, being a better player can open some doors. In my experience people often care more about how hard/easy it is to work with you, and how many songs you know of the top of your head.
Absolutely true about the benefit of doubling. I may not be as good as folks that just focus on one, but I get calls for both. And as I mentioned, I also love classical, so there’s another whole side of double bass. My teacher is also a doubler and someone who is equally fond of playing arco classical, jazz upright, electric bass funk. I don’t think I could ever just settle on electric or upright, to the exclusion of the other. I’ll just have to settle for pretty good on both. And that’s ok. There will be periods when I’ll focus on one over the other but I’ll probably always pursue both. And hopefully piano too. I think I’ve answered my original question.
 

Latest posts