• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

For some reason, I hate the way it sounds when I use my audio interface

So I have a Focusrite Scarlett (the 2i2 I believe - not sitting in front of it at the moment), and I’ll occasionally mess around with garage band.

Don’t know what it is, but it sounds so radically different than my experience going direct at church, or playing with an amp.

Is it just that Garage Band is junk, the interface is junk, or am I just being overly sensitive?

Granted, I haven’t gone in and really tried to play around with EQ, but it just sounds so unpleasant and artificial that I don’t even really know where to start.
 
I've used those interfaces and that software - I'll agree they are both "starter" products, but they work well.

I'm going to venture a guess that you are used to more signal processing than what you get by just plugging into an interface and hitting "record".

If you haven't already tried this, start a new garageband project, and select an audio track for guitar or bass. This will load a virtual amp you can tinker with.
 
I've used those interfaces and that software - I'll agree they are both "starter" products, but they work well.

I'm going to venture a guess that you are used to more signal processing than what you get by just plugging into an interface and hitting "record".

If you haven't already tried this, start a new garageband project, and select an audio track for guitar or bass. This will load a virtual amp you can tinker with.

Yeah, I've played with choosing different amps... It's just odd.

I'm going to play around some this weekend and see if I can articulate better. It's just sort of sad when the sound is harsher on my ears than the Voice Memo app on my phone.
 
Active or passive bass? Are you plugging into the instrument 1/4" jack direct? Are you using the 'mic' or 'line' level switch setting? I find my 2i2 sounds fine; I run an active bass into a passive DI. For 'best' sound I use a preamp with tone-shaping and CabSim, but the 'raw' sound is fine for practice. I've heard it said that the 2i2 doesn't have much headroom, so tinkering with levels may produce payoffs. Plugging direct with a passive bass may have a suboptimal impedance match. Speculation on my part...
 
I would agree that going in cold, straight into the interface without any processing at all can be very dry sounding and not always very pleasant. I have also found that it does not reflect my experience with an amp rig either. So much going on live ... bass tone controls, amp eq, speakers, room ambiance/space ... that does not really get captured in a totally clean plug straight into the interface sound .. even if its sometimes desired by an engineer or producer (so they can mess with it later in the box).

Of course, that clean clean clean signal is also all you and your bass, so it can be revealing of a lot of stuff in your technique. IMO/IME, it's good to work with it from a technique improvement perspective in mind.

As has already been said, there are lots of ways to color your sound going into the interface ... preamps, compressors, cabsims (either outboard or in the box) etc.
Just be prepared to differentiate between what you want it to sound like and what an engineer or producer wants to hear and you'll be totally good.

good luck OP ... lots to work with.
 
Active or passive bass? Are you plugging into the instrument 1/4" jack direct? Are you using the 'mic' or 'line' level switch setting? I find my 2i2 sounds fine; I run an active bass into a passive DI. For 'best' sound I use a preamp with tone-shaping and CabSim, but the 'raw' sound is fine for practice. I've heard it said that the 2i2 doesn't have much headroom, so tinkering with levels may produce payoffs. Plugging direct with a passive bass may have a suboptimal impedance match. Speculation on my part...

Active with the instrument setting and pad activated direct into the interface.
 
Oh boy you're trying to recreate playing in a church while playing at home with headphones or monitors If I understand correctly.

Firstly you need a good solid input signal so raise that gain knob until the signal peaks at -18 to -6 dB.

Then use amp and cab sims to color the sound and don't forget to add some room reverb. Compression and surgical corrective EQ are imperative (If you have a sound guy ask him what he usually does to your signal or bass in general).
Amps have 3 or 4 controls set to specific frequencies. A parametric EQ is what will give you the sound in your head once you center in on the frequencies that trouble/please your ears.

Honestly you won't recreate the feel of a turned up amp and cab blowing air into your body and the rumble of a PA projecting in a church unless you can get those kinds of volumes out of some monitors or powered speakers at home.

FX can get you there soundwise but never feelwise IMO.
 
It could be many things.

My experience with software has been IK multimedia and Native Instruments.
Those plugins for amp emulations are very vey good.
Im using Cubase for a DAW and can process at 64 bit.

So it could mean many things like software resolution
Or if you have latency.

Or how you monitor the signal. Simple desktop speakers or small computer speakers
will never sound like a live situation.
In recordings on playback. Usually capturing a range of good and classic or unique guitar tones.
Would be thought to be more difficult. But my Guitar tones in re amped recordings.
Is rather haunting how good they sound. And eliminated a lot of problems with recording
real high end equipment and getting not so great sound. Mainly the room problems.

I use standard desktop speakers with a subwoofer for monitors The sub really helps with making drums
and bass sound more realistic. Not only for listening but for mixing down.

Often though when im doing a lot of bass tracks or guitar tracks. I use different speakers to monitor with.
I use old school pioneer home stereo speakers. The big old guys that have big white paper cone woofers and the old style big paper cone midranges and tweeters.

Im sure some hifi guys would laugh. But was just reading another thread on a HiFi forum where
there is many fans of the old paper cone speakers. And guys use the old big 3" paper cone tweeters.
The resolution is not like the fancy domes or ribbon tweeters. But really my point is I like to use big
12" speakers for monitors when im doing guitar or bass tracks. Sound more real to me like live.

I also tend to turn off a lot of the " room" emulation in plugins.
Just use very simple cab emulations. The " room" sound is not fake sounding.
But might be the fake sound you describe. Ironic because it sounds to real.
The " room" sound as I mentioned earlier was often the annoyance of recording real equipment.

Far as what you mean by " fake" could be latency or just a poor soundcard.
Also many i dont think notice how " fake" active pickups can sound.
Its usually noticed more with direct recordings. Again all subjective.
It is the internet, I cant hear what your hearing. But know from many years of recording how some soundcards or monitors really added to a fake sound. Also way back when soundcards could only do 16 bit or maybe 24 bit if your processor could handle it. At minimum a lot of clarity and fake sound went away when I had 64 bit resolution software. And the soundcard could go up to 24 bit output all the time. Check you soundcard settings.
Run the highest bit rate and sampling speed you can
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: g-dude
Yeah, I've played with choosing different amps... It's just odd.

I'm going to play around some this weekend and see if I can articulate better. It's just sort of sad when the sound is harsher on my ears than the Voice Memo app on my phone.

*edit* I didn't even look at who I was responding to. That being said..bygons.. as far as I'm concerned we're all fellow musicians as well as human beings and I'm leaving it at that.

Two words. "Impulse Responses". Don't get me wrong, there's a lot more that goes into a good recording and mastering of a bass signal. But recent experiences have pointed me towards cabinet simulations as having a HUGELY positive effect on my bass's tone through headphones from an audio interface.

Strings are an option but hear me out here. My P-bass had Rotosound 77 Jazz flats .45-.105on it for about a year and frankly, they sounded freaking great. They were stiff as all heck. But that bass didn't need EQ. I could plug it direct into my interface and it would produce sweet sweet tones. I could barely hear the difference in rolling the tone on and off unless I was playing with a backing track and other instruments. Silky smooth.. you maybe barely heard the occasional clack of a fret or my finger grazing a string with the tone full on.. rolled off it was just eliminating the string noise.

I decided in like August or September to see why people on these forums rave about TI Flats. They're a thinner gauge and boy they freaking sound like it too. Plugged directly into my interface that bass sounded like :poop: in a tin can. The tone thickened up when I rolled the tone knob off but the more tone I added the more cringeworthy it got. As I've seen another member say..it was like the bass had lost all it's booty. The following weekend I took my P-bass to my band's jamspace where my 410 cabinet lived. I plug into my amp and the bass just sounds fantastic. I was relieved, but confused. So I take my amp home with me (not my cab) and run a post-EQ signal from the XLR out. The EQ helps.. but it's still not the wonderful tone I was getting from my amp and cabinet.

Fast forward a few months I get a Pod Go for my birthday... I have a Strat and no guitar gear. A month and a half later I'm still not playing my Strat much but I use the Pod with my bass daily. It has several bass amp or just the preamps of those amps as well as several bass cabinet simulations.. I also 4 cable routed the Pod through the effects loop of my amp. I can switch between my amp and any given one of the Pod's amp simulations by toggling a footswitch.

The amp sims on their own.. while they have their own flavors, as well as my amp having it's own characteristics. I'm able to get similar tones between a few of them however, I've even gotten some of those amp sims pretty close to my amp with the right settings on both. But those cabinet simulations man.. the SVT 810 Sim is like instant booty. DEEP lows that sound so good. So now the TI Flats not only feel good under my fingers but sound good in my recording setup. Other cab sims might sound a little brighter, or even not as loud but still have punch.

Long story short.. it doesn't have to be with a floor pedal like a pod go, helix, kemper or whatever.. you can purchase or maybe even find some freeware VST to get similar results in a DAW, maybe not as user friendly as the Pod has been to me.. but I'd start with an amp/cab sim combination.. From there you can start thinking about compression, EQ VST, or other effects.

Using VST you could record that dry track you're unahppy with and try all sorts of cab sims during playback. You could also use a re-amp box to do the same thing through an effects pedal or amp though.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: g-dude and Bonsist
Make sure you have the latest version of GarageBand - there are superb EQ’s and compressors built in, basically the same ones that come with Logic. Start with the presets for bass and tweak from there. The amp sims aren’t bad either, but for most projects I just stick with EQ & compression. When I’m doing production quality work, I plug my bass into a BAE 1073 before the interface.
Of course, many other factors are at play here - monitors, headphones, room, etc. Welcome to the rabbit hole!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lovep and g-dude
I do not use Garage band much but I just did a test with my Iphone 7 and the basic first tone was a bit thin, but I rolled the tone down and turned up some squeeze, what ever that is suppose to be, and got a very reasonable tone, right off the bat. That was just the startup setting showing a microphone. I never use Garage Band but I use a DAW into headphones everyday. I have some issues with the limitations of multiple apps in IOS, but the basic tone Garageband tone was fine and usable.
Somethings mucked up, possibly in the interface driver settings. I assume you are using a reasonable set of headphones.
Give it a chance, you should get a basic and decent direct sound. How are the other things like drums or virtual instruments are sounding?
 
  • Like
Reactions: g-dude
Maybe not relevant, since I use a Presonus USB 96 into Studio One, but I made a daft mistake yesterday. I plugged the USB into my laptop after starting Studio One, and then wondered why everything was so thin, distorted, and laggy. I had forgotten to change the input from Windows Audio to AudioBox. And it did indeed sound dreadful.
I don't know how Focusrite/Garageband works, but check the really obvious stuff before you delve into tone tweaking.

Peace,
SoundSupport
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drzejzi and g-dude
So I have a Focusrite Scarlett (the 2i2 I believe - not sitting in front of it at the moment), and I’ll occasionally mess around with garage band.

Don’t know what it is, but it sounds so radically different than my experience going direct at church, or playing with an amp.

Is it just that Garage Band is junk, the interface is junk, or am I just being overly sensitive?

Granted, I haven’t gone in and really tried to play around with EQ, but it just sounds so unpleasant and artificial that I don’t even really know where to start.
I have a 2i2 and it sounds pretty good imo. Maybe not as good as some of the insanely expensive studio setups I’ve used but I can get a decent sound. I don’t like going right into it though. I always either xlr out of my Mesa subway into it or use a sans amp. I use reaper for my DAW. It’s free to try if you want to download it and see if a different DAW makes any difference. Could be just the playback system also. How are you listening to it? Headphones, monitor speakers? I tend to use headphones but for anything I put out publicly I always listen to on my car stereo and compare to other mixes and makes some tweaks. Might just be that your not used to monitoring the sound that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: g-dude
Wow, so a ton of things to try, but it seems like a lot of what is working is:

- having something else sitting between the instrument and the interface
- using additional plugins or other software
- engaging in some serious tweaking

Time to start some trial and error tests.

I think what is encouraging is that I’m not seeing a lot of input of “I opened up GarageBand and immediately recorded a platinum selling album on default settings”.
 
Yes, as others have said something in between the bass and interface would help. That or some high quality amp sims and IRs.

I like to use a mix of my physical pedals into my amp head DI out but then use cabinet IRs to avoid having to mic up a speaker. You can get much closer to a natural bass sound this way, it's worth a try.

It's nice to take a clean DI as well if you are processing with analogue gear in case you need to backtrack or don't like the baked in tone you've commited too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tosh
^ second that ^

I really like to record through the DI from my Rootmaster head, because it is post-process.

at the same time I can DI from my wireless receiver pedal, which is good because it is pre-process.

best of both worlds. And I admit that I really don't mess with virtual amps very much, unless I'm looking for something that I can't get out of my hardware.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DingwallDingus
Wow, so a ton of things to try, but it seems like a lot of what is working is:

- having something else sitting between the instrument and the interface
- using additional plugins or other software
- engaging in some serious tweaking

Time to start some trial and error tests.

I think what is encouraging is that I’m not seeing a lot of input of “I opened up GarageBand and immediately recorded a platinum selling album on default settings”.
It's not unusual for great basslines to be recorded clean, with the kind of stuff we're talking about being added later during the mixing process. So it's not that common for a super clean bassline to stay that way throughout the mixing process, but it does happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LowActionHero

Latest posts