*If they were, it wouldn't be forgiveness. Either they would have made up for whatever they did, paid their debt so that any further rancor against them was unjust and no forgiveness was needed, or one would agree to overlook something because their value in some other sphere outweighs the offense in question. Actual forgiveness means there was a genuine offense but the forgiver chooses not to demand just consequences for it, to swallow the debt and restore the relationship simply because it is their wish to do so.
Hrod
I agree with you-all except the last part....sometimes it is just not healthy to re-enter a relationship with someone that wronged you-you forgive them but not with the intent to restore the relationship. ....sometimes there was no relationship to start with...when a stranger wrongs you
*
Forgiveness is on the opposite side of making amends (perspective of the person who wronged another) but both work towards the same general goals....the other side does not have to accept the amends/forgiveness however it definitely benefits the one who is making the amends/or attempting to forgive
*
As a person in recovery-both are essential
IMO