I never said that all European rhythms are stiff.
This is what I said.
Nice quote.
I think there may be something of interest in the bit of people not wanting to have been influenced by stuffy old white folks.
I think the "would even want to be influenced by" is a different avenue than actually influenced by. If you look at that, considering that "R&B" was a term invented to take the place of "Negro music" or "race music" we're looking at an era predating most members of talkbass. For those who came of age before Roots, before the black power movement, the drive and focus was not Africa, but very urban, very American.
The push is to look good and sound good, the frequent themes of swagger, virtuosity. The glamour, the bling, the style was not looking anywhere to Africa. I think the allure of "Africa" in the culture has been so powerful since its resurgence
because it was omitted for generations previously.
My hunch is if you time-travelled back to 1940s and talked to people in R&B that they'd be very put off by talk of Africa, tribalism, or primitive elements or influences on their lives and music.
I'm not saying that there weren't African elements influencing R&B, etc.
I really do think if you're going to talk about influence (in contrast to wanting to be influenced), you need to be more analytical than talking about a "stiff feel." Stiff feel or its absence should be marked by some actual musical quality.
Rhythm in European music (and African music from the regions we'd consider relevant to R&B) are based on subdivision. 32 bars, each bar with 4 beats (or whatever), each beat chopped up triples or duples.
I think if you break down beat patterns, you might find something that's African and not European. Kinda like the standard reggae beat (1) 2 THREE 4, that is really Caribbean. I get kinda hung up on "the one" though.