They are designed to be connected to a GK MB combo, using the chain out. You control the cab from the combo.
Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
$100 is not out of line these days, They (UPS) charged me over $135 for shipping a 210 neo cab, they charge per cubic inch now and I have a discount!
I just realized I never posted pics of my GK rig (Legacy 112 & Neo IV 112). Was at the practice space, but rotated out (not through any fault of its own, just seeing how my surplus of gear works). Very loud and clear, these neo 12's are definitely in the "super 12" category. Only thing I don't like is the knobs turn way too easily, but now that I'm using my wireless, not an issue.
So much GK goodness tonight does a heart good
I am new to GK and I am looking to purchase a "good" and reliable bass amp that I can have for a long time. In particular, I am looking at solid state and the GK Legacy 500-450 ultra light bass head. My genre is late 60's early 70's blues rock (i.e., Grand Funk Railroad, early Led Zep, early Humble Pie, early Aerosmith...you get the picture) with a little grit and overdrive with less midrange and treble. How are GK bass amp heads in terms of reliability? Service when/if needed? Tone for what I play? I have 2x15 Ampeg cabs and a Fender American Professional II Jazz bass (passive). How does GK align with my interests? Thanks in advance! -Bill
My experience with GK amps is that they are very articulate in the highs and the Legacy series, in particular, has an incredibly focused midrange.
They are fantastic, reliable amps, but I don't know if they are the best amps for your tonal goals.
Agreed. I think few devoted GK users would suggest the entire family lacks midrange and/or treble. However they also feature powerful and predictable EQ that makes them quite versatile. You need to try them and see. They do all share a "voice" that you'll like …or not.
I know I don't the "big" GK heads but my MB-200's(my favorite) and my Fusion 500 does exactly what I need. They are very easy to dual in at each venue.
I simply love them.
Anyone have any size comparison for the GK neo 212, the newest version? None locally to see it, not many videos showing the size. Like a picture of it next to a chair or something lol
The Neo IV 212 is about the same size as a folding chair, albeit a little smaller. It is really compact. Online specs say Height:27.7" Width:19.1" Depth:14.7"
The 700 is my favorite head of the RB series and I owned them all in the past. Including the 2001. The 700 just sounded "warmer" to my ears.
I don't know about the "warmer" part because I've never done a direct comparison between a 700RB and 1001RB - but to me the 700RB -II is the perfect blend of power, portability, and tone.
My 400RB, 800RB, 400RB-III, 1001RB-II, Fusion 550, MB800 and Legacy 800 were all fantastic, but the 700RB is just my happy place...all those other amps (and many more!) have come and gone, but the 700RB sounds "right" to me every time I plug in.
If gk would have made the Legacy 212 combo with the side handles (even though I prefer the recessed ones to the knuckle buster flip out ones), I would have gotten one of those and that would be the gig rig. But I'm not an engineer (or bean counter) so maybe it's not that easy. But imho the vertical 2x12 cab is the easiest to schlep and takes up very little space on stage (which encourages the guitar players to spread out
).
Loved the Fusion 550. Not even sure why I sold it. Was downsizing at the time as it has been 7 or 8 years since I had it. I am running a Fusion 212 currently. Just more GK goodness. Also want to add a Legacy series head.
The term I have seen before when referring to the 700 was it "hit the rails" easier than the bigger RB heads. I guess that means it sweet spot was easier to achieve at lower volumes.
