Now the arguments start.
Seems to always eventually go in the direction of:
"My (cheaper) [country] made [brand] is just as good, if not better than the (more expensive) [country] made [brand].
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's not "really" the point here. I feel like the point is:
Most artists rent a studio, which costs x dollars an hour.
And then they hire session guys, who also typically charge y dollars an hour.
So every minute you [the session guy] are in studio, you are charging.
So let us switch roles, lets say you (an artist) is going to hire a session guy. You get a list and it has their gear next to their name. All of their rates are comparable.
Will you pick the guy with the $200 instrument or the guy with the $2000 instrument?
When you are deciding this, do you want to take a chance on losing a day in studio and the money you paid for the day because you decided brands didn't matter?
Or are you going to go with the brand, that more often than not, always yields better results?
I understand that my bottom line bass has been nodded and that I trust it as much as my upper line one. I know that I've had it for years. It's never let me down. But my client doesn't. He/she doesn't have experience with it. It could be a CL bass and he/she doesn't want to risk it. Especially when there are literally hundreds of other musicians in line that want the part just as much as you.