Sorry, Cousteau beat you to the genre by about 10 years:Add this one to your list...I made up a genre on reverbnation, it's in the alternative section....alt/lounge!
[This invalid link has been removed]
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Sorry, Cousteau beat you to the genre by about 10 years:Add this one to your list...I made up a genre on reverbnation, it's in the alternative section....alt/lounge!
[This invalid link has been removed]
Why does it matter?
Using genres is merely a way to organize art. As art grows, and new advancements are made, new genres come into existence. Genres form by conventions that change over time as new genres are invented and the use of old ones is discontinued.
Genre began as an absolute classification system for ancient Greek literature. Poetry, prose, and performance each had a specific and calculated style that related to the theme of the story. Speech patterns for comedy would not be appropriate for tragedy, and even actors were restricted to their genre under the assumption that a type of person could tell one type of story best. In later periods genres proliferated and developed in response to changes in audiences and creators. Genre became a dynamic tool to help the public make sense out of unpredictable art. Because art is often a response to a social state, in that people write/paint/sing/dance about what they know about, the use of genre as a tool must be able to adapt to changing meanings.
There's always been genres and sub-genres. We're just more aware of their existence now since information moves so quickly.
I'm mostly disturbed by the over-usage of the word 'recognized' in the first post.
Why does it matter?
Using genres is merely a way to organize art. As art grows, and new advancements are made, new genres come into existence. Genres form by conventions that change over time as new genres are invented and the use of old ones is discontinued.
Genre began as an absolute classification system for ancient Greek literature. Poetry, prose, and performance each had a specific and calculated style that related to the theme of the story. Speech patterns for comedy would not be appropriate for tragedy, and even actors were restricted to their genre under the assumption that a type of person could tell one type of story best. In later periods genres proliferated and developed in response to changes in audiences and creators. Genre became a dynamic tool to help the public make sense out of unpredictable art. Because art is often a response to a social state, in that people write/paint/sing/dance about what they know about, the use of genre as a tool must be able to adapt to changing meanings.
There's always been genres and sub-genres. We're just more aware of their existence now since information moves so quickly.
I'm mostly disturbed by the over-usage of the word 'recognized' in the first post.
It was rhetorical, it does matter, at the level of classification.Ok... That little grammatical train wreck was tidied up... And in reply to your first question... Does it matter? No, not in the least really. Just an old fellow trying to sidetrack his present concerns in a nonsensical way really.
It was rhetorical, it does matter, at the level of classification.
Organization and classification is important in the art world.
That's why I gave such a "technical" response.
Why would you say that?![]()
If not for multiple genres with subtle differences, how would we know what to distain?Why does it matter?
Using genres is merely a way to organize art. As art grows, and new advancements are made, new genres come into existence. Genres form by conventions that change over time as new genres are invented and the use of old ones is discontinued.
Genre began as an absolute classification system for ancient Greek literature. Poetry, prose, and performance each had a specific and calculated style that related to the theme of the story. Speech patterns for comedy would not be appropriate for tragedy, and even actors were restricted to their genre under the assumption that a type of person could tell one type of story best. In later periods genres proliferated and developed in response to changes in audiences and creators. Genre became a dynamic tool to help the public make sense out of unpredictable art. Because art is often a response to a social state, in that people write/paint/sing/dance about what they know about, the use of genre as a tool must be able to adapt to changing meanings.
There's always been genres and sub-genres. We're just more aware of their existence now since information moves so quickly.
I'm mostly disturbed by the over-usage of the word 'recognized' in the first post.
I disdain spelling errors.If not for multiple genres with subtle differences, how would we know what to distain?

Folk metal??? Come on....