TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Ah, no wonder some Shuttles were on sale recently... I did not know a new line of products was under way. Do we have an official press release yet?
I am sure these will be killers, but I just picked up a brand new Shuttle 9.0, that should do for a while.
For passive versus active basses. Perfect!!
KJung said:IMO not at all. The Shuttles are voiced very modern, have all the modern bells and whistles, and according to Roger, that line is not changing.
This amp will appeal to a different type of player. If the preamp works/sounds like it is described, this will be a very tubey, and if you want it, snarly grindy, sounding amp.
In another part of this site, Roger posted that the design goal is that this amp's tone and feel is designed for guys who love all tube amps but hate the weight. Whether they are successful or not will be defined by those types of players in the market.
If you like it 'tight, bright, and clean', the other amps in the Shuttle line will probably still float your boat.
Sounds like the design goals of RH450.
it is also if somebody wants tube overdrive. That's why we called it "gain" instead of active/passive.
...
Back to the Streamliner... I'm thinking that picking up a Shuttle 9.0 might not be a bad thing. From the sounds of it, the Streamliner is a pretty different deal, and having the option of both of those two amps would cover pretty much any gig... a nice one-two punch.
The SVT7Pro or whatever that class D/SMPS but with a classic SVT tube front end model is seems to be the closest thing to this amp currently on the market... of course, it is quite a bit larger, and I'm sure has its own 'tubelike tone'.
IMO not at all. The Shuttles are voiced very modern, have all the modern bells and whistles, and according to Roger, that line is not changing.
This amp will appeal to a different type of player. If the preamp works/sounds like it is described, this will be a very tubey, and if you want it, snarly grindy, sounding amp.
In another part of this site, Roger posted that the design goal is that this amp's tone and feel is designed for guys who love all tube amps but hate the weight. Whether they are successful or not will be defined by those types of players in the market.
If you like it 'tight, bright, and clean', the other amps in the Shuttle line will probably still float your boat.
Might be the truth.
We'll have to check them out.
Good point.. Tubes can also be very clear and clean sounding too...
Lets not forget that the SA200 is an all tube amp... and it is not exactly snarly and grindy. I suppose it could be if one were to get on it.. but it is a nice clean fat sounding all tube amp.
Then the other side of the coin is Hiwatts, Orange, Marshall, Reeves etc.. which do that snarly grindy thing you speak about..
Dont know if the poweramp section of the Streamliner and 9 are exactly the same..
I owned a Reeves 225 for a bit, and as Paul sang in Penny Lane, "it's a clean machine."
Since the Shuttle 9 has the clean sound, I would think that Genz would provide a different soundscape with the Streamliner.
Then the other side of the coin is Hiwatts, Orange, Marshall, Reeves etc.. which do that snarly grindy thing you speak about..
I believe I read in a previous post from the Genz folks that the Shuttle 9 and the Streamliner have the same poweramp section.
Well, if you want to keep your rack clean - or if you are rack-averse - then you can always put the bottle opener on the bass!
Link Removed
IME, my Orange AD200 is certainly an overdrive machine, but my Reeves C225 is a very clean, lush sounding amp, and not very snarly/grindy at all.
interesting... I guess it depends on how you use it. since the sa200 i played was very clean... at a moderate gigging volume.. 410 cab gig