• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Genzler Amplification MG800 Magellan head - video

I still run my Genz Uber cabs every week... My Uber 115 slays... But i would love to experiment with a Ceramic style 15 in the cab. ( just to see what it sounds like).. But this cab has been delivering the goods for years. from some arena gigs to all of my bar gigs.. Ill use two of them for larger gigs , but One will do just fine 80% of the time.. Its an efficient cab
 
All It took was 1 live gig for me to know that the Genzler 800 was my new go to amp and I immediately put my Mesa D800 for sale. Very impressed with the build quality and tone quality this amp head puts out. Hopefully one day soon I can get me some matching cabs to pair with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eff-clef
I LOVE MESA stuff.. I tried both amps, the D800 and the Magellan. . Honestly I prefered the Magellan too..
Not to take anything away from the mesa. But the Magellan would work for me 95% of the time..
I just did some festival shows with an SVT4 and 810.. The Boss like bass loud on stage and NOT thru the monitors.. I could have used Two svt4s and 2 - 810s.. Ughhhhh...
This week im back to Normal world..
Magellan is a FULL sounding and even feeling amp...
All It took was 1 live gig for me to know that the Genzler 800 was my new go to amp and I immediately put my Mesa D800 for sale. Very impressed with the build quality and tone quality this amp head puts out. Hopefully one day soon I can get me some matching cabs to pair with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: campbems
I play lots of medium to large clubs and festivals with a funk band. I am always jumping back and forth between slap and fingers, thus I am constantly tweaking my EQ (from my bass) to accommodate. I am looking for an amp based foot-switchable solution. I am a big fan of micros and have been using a WW Blue Light (1200w into 4 ohms) for these gigs. The Magellan sounds like it may be a great solution, but I am concerned about the headroom. Any comments on the headroom from the Magellan? The Puma 900 was another option for me.

I've been using the WW for years now, and it is an amazing amp. I know it is probably a very different animal as compared to the Magellan, or probably most other micros on the market these days. Maybe in its essence it's not even the right amp for funk. Moreover, if you own a WW you have a lot of money sitting in an amp where, when Walter goes away you are stuck. He really hasnt brought in anyone to carry the torch, so to speak. So that's a whole other background consideration.
 
I like headroom > And i do play pretty loud Most of the time
I play P basses for some gigs and Jazz 4 or 5 at other times. I have played my MG800 thru a pair of uber 115s that are (going away) .. It really opens up on a 4 Ω cab,,,, I am currently gigging one new Magellan 212t cab 4Ω..
It moves air and has a beautiful clean sound for slap bass. The CONTOUR Makes it easy to go to slap tone in a simple turn of the knob..
I can also add another 8 ohm cab to my current 4 ohm cab for a total of 2.5 ohms when i really want shake my pants.
From what i remember I think the Magellan has a more OPEN sound than the WW head.. I didn't think the WW head that I played had much power for what it claimed it had. The 800 watts @ 4Ω seems like a real 800 watts to me. Or real close. It is NOT a shy amp at all..

I was at NAMM , and F bass had a Tonehammer 500 head on their Demo Rig.. Someone came by and tried their PUMA head with the same bass and same cab. The Puma was more clear than the TH500 better bottom and open top.. . It was like a blanket was taken off the cab after the tonehammer..

The Puma is a great head..
Personally ,I prefer the features of the MG 800.. The easy to dial in sound .. Maybe the easiest i have ever used . And if I needed help, I can get it from the owner of the company by posting HERE..
If you are able to try one out in store.. Give it a whirl..

I got mine online . Genzler offers a 10 day return policy which i didn't have to use.. I think they are paying a large portion of shipping too... I think it is reasonable too..

I found the EQ on the magellan to be very easy to use. Very active. It's almost impossible to get a bad sound. You would have to try very hard to make it not work for you. I play Rock/ pop/ RnB/ Blues/ some jazz standards gigs. church gigs. small and large gigs..

The Magellan does CLEAN very well. But it can do dirty too.. Not Fuzzy dirty.. But nice OD if one so wishes by using the Drive channel..
But to me the key features that i use most are Input gain, very little EQ, and some Contour.. Its does 2.6 Ω and has one of the finest DI Outs on any amp head that i have gigged.



I play lots of medium to large clubs and festivals with a funk band. I am always jumping back and forth between slap and fingers, thus I am constantly tweaking my EQ (from my bass) to accommodate. I am looking for an amp based foot-switchable solution. I am a big fan of micros and have been using a WW Blue Light (1200w into 4 ohms) for these gigs. The Magellan sounds like it may be a great solution, but I am concerned about the headroom. Any comments on the headroom from the Magellan? The Puma 900 was another option for me.

I've been using the WW for years now, and it is an amazing amp. I know it is probably a very different animal as compared to the Magellan, or probably most other micros on the market these days. Maybe in its essence it's not even the right amp for funk. Moreover, if you own a WW you have a lot of money sitting in an amp where, when Walter goes away you are stuck. He really hasnt brought in anyone to carry the torch, so to speak. So that's a whole other background consideration.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: campbems and kobass
I think the nicest thing about the MG800 is the Contour A/B switch. You can go form a nice old school R&B tone with more low mid punch to a fat slap tone with deeper bass and clearer highs. It would have been great if Genzler had included a footswitch so you don't have to manually push the button on the front panel.

I like headroom > And i do play pretty loud Most of the time
I play P basses for some gigs and Jazz 4 or 5 at other times. I have played my MG800 thru a pair of uber 115s that are (going away) .. It really opens up on a 4 Ω cab,,,, I am currently gigging one new Magellan 212t cab 4Ω..
It moves air and has a beautiful clean sound for slap bass. The CONTOUR Makes it easy to go to slap tone in a simple turn of the knob..
I can also add another 8 ohm cab to my current 4 ohm cab for a total of 2.5 ohms when i really want shake my pants.
From what i remember I think the Magellan has a more OPEN sound than the WW head.. I didn't think the WW head that I played had much power for what it claimed it had.

I was at NAMM , and F bass had a Tonehammer 500 head on their Demo Rig.. Someone came by and tried their PUMA head with the same bass and same cab. The Puma was more clear than the TH500 better bottom and open top.. . It was like a blanket was taken off the cab after the tonehammer..

The Puma is a great head..
Personally ,I prefer the features of the MG 800.. The easy to dial in sound .. Maybe the easiest i have ever used . And if I needed help, I can get it from the owner of the company by posting HERE..
If you are able to try one out in store.. Give it a whirl..

I got mine online . Genzler offers a 10 day return policy which i didn't have to use.. I think they are paying a large portion of shipping too... I think it is reasonable too..

I found the EQ on the magellan to be very easy to use. Very active. It's almost impossible to get a bad sound. You would have to try very hard to make it not work for you. I play Rock/ pop/ RnB/ Blues/ some jazz standards gigs. church gigs. small and large gigs..

The Magellan does CLEAN very well. But it can do dirty too.. Not Fuzzy dirty.. But nice OD if one so wishes by using the Drive channel..
But to me the key features that i use most are Input gain, very little EQ, and some Contour.. Its does 2.6 Ω and has one of the finest DI Outs on any amp head that i have gigged.
 
Thanks for the great replies.... very, very clarifying and helpful!!
I thought I read that you can control the A/B contour with a generic footswitch via a rear panel "footswitch-in". Is this accurate?
 
Thanks for the great replies.... very, very clarifying and helpful!!
I thought I read that you can control the A/B contour with a generic footswitch via a rear panel "footswitch-in". Is this accurate?
According to my manual "any single button foot switch...operates the Clean and Drive channel switching on the front panel." A useful feature but the addition of an A/B contour and Mute foot switch(ability) would have been nice too.
 
According to my manual "any single button foot switch...operates the Clean and Drive channel switching on the front panel." A useful feature but the addition of an A/B contour and Mute foot switch(ability) would have been nice too.
This is correct, the channel selection is available via a generic footswitch.
The other options were all discussed during development but we chose to keep this model a little more simple. We have a lot of past experience with complex switching functions and were aware of the added complexity and costs.
It was our goal to deliver the most "bang for the buck" so to speak and keep the price of this model as approachable as possible.
 
This is correct, the channel selection is available via a generic footswitch.
The other options were all discussed during development but we chose to keep this model a little more simple. We have a lot of past experience with complex switching functions and were aware of the added complexity and costs.
It was our goal to deliver the most "bang for the buck" so to speak and keep the price of this model as approachable as possible.
And a fine job you did. Great amp for the price.
 
  • Like
Reactions: svtb15 and kobass
I think the mute on the front panel is adequate. Never needed to mute from a footswitch, esp when it's available on the amp itself. I am sure others might find it useful, just my take.
I'll be putting in my order today!!
Thanks everyone for the feedback....
 
  • Like
Reactions: sanwin17
Yes, I agree. To be able to footswitch the contour is most useful to me. "Drive" is a borderline effect, but EQ is your sound. I think within a given performance's sound profile requirements, to be able to quickly modify the bass EQ to be more "old school", or "slap" or "Jaco" on the fly is a more useful control.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sanwin17