He's not talking about putting up housing for gang bangers and the like. He's talking about turning the place into condos for retiree's (primariy) on fixed incomes.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Or will they wait for the influx of thugs and do Angry Gangs?
I wanna watch!![]()
I understand why he is doing it. However, I have not found any opposition for this project so far. Aside from his motives, if it does happen it is a good thing. That's all i am saying.
He never destroyed Star Wars for me. I can't even remember those "prequel" movies.
I think you guys are giving Georgie too much of a hard time. I think he probably does care for poor people...but he now has a delish way of demonstrating it.
And it's not "poor" people per se. Low income housing is for people who make less than 50(?)% of the city's median. You're still talking about rich people. Just not with Porsche's and Mercedes. Think BMW's parked under a carport in a nice condo complex with $3000/month rent.
I can not believe how many people think that putting low income housing in nice towns and neighborhoods is a good thing.
Do any of you own a nice hose that you worked hard to get?
My neighborhood, town and schools have been devastated by low income housing.
First the county comes in and takes the land by imminent domain. They put up the housing and fill it with people that do not have the same values of the residents. All of a sudden we have gang bangers, the schools turns into war zones and everyone's property values drop while our taxes shoot up.
And before you accuse me of living in a all white raciest town, we were very diverse before this. The Vietnamese family next door or the black family two houses over will say the same thing. We worked hard to buy our houses.
You will be hard pressed to find anyone that owns a home in any town that this has had low income housing put in that will tell you that it improved their town or way of life.
I can not believe how many people think that putting low income housing in nice towns and neighborhoods is a good thing.
Do any of you own a nice hose that you worked hard to get?
People think it's a nice thing in terms of social responsibility, not in terms of personal comfort.
It's not going to be a section 8 welfare housing development folks. It's going to be a development targeted toward seniors and working families making from $40-80,000 a year. That's certainly not the same demographic as the generational welfare group.
But of course it makes it a bit harder to heap on the "hate" if you include that information in the discussion.
what say we leave off the name calling and discuss the issue like grown-ups?
BTW, you did not respond to any of the above posts about how low-income government housing has ruined neighborhoods/cities.
is it true or is it not....don't you think it's relevant to the discussion?
That was cool. Utterly destroying them was not.
Exactly. It's not public housing.In this particular discussion I don't think the comparisons are relevant at all. The proposed development isn't a section 8 type development. Comparing this proposal to the stereotypical "projects" full of gang bangers and addicts is like comparing apples to lampposts. Everyone is entitled to criticize, but imo it should be accurate criticism.... not inaccurate broad brushing.
How is it a good thing? I am not rich, pretty poor actually, and would not want all the crime that comes with Low income housing (projects)...and before you want to label me and talk about stereotypes, let me set you up in deluxe apartment hear in Saginaw, MI., nice low income housing and, we will see your opinion change real fast as you dodge bullets trying to get away...